|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 226-230
|Primary extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of breast
Smita Srivastava1, Jyoti Arora1, Anushri Parakh1, Ruchika Kumar Goel2
1 Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
2 Department of Pathology, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
|Date of Web Publication||21-Jun-2016|
| Abstract|| |
Extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma (EES) is a rare soft tissue tumor that is morphologically indistinguishable from skeletal ES. We report a case of a 25-year-old female with recurrent EES/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of right breast with imaging findings on mammogram, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging breast, and positron emission tomography–computed tomography.
Keywords: Breast; extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma; primitive neuroectodermal tumor
|How to cite this article:|
Srivastava S, Arora J, Parakh A, Goel RK. Primary extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of breast. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016;26:226-30
|How to cite this URL:|
Srivastava S, Arora J, Parakh A, Goel RK. Primary extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of breast. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Oct 31];26:226-30. Available from: https://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2016/26/2/226/184408
| Introduction|| |
Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a highly malignant bone tumor of long bones occurring in children and young adults and was first described by James Ewing in 1921. However, there have been reported cases of malignant soft tissue tumors which are indistinguishable from ES and have been called extraskeletal ES (EES). These tumors are now classified as ES family of tumors (ESFT) and include ES, EES, and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), which shows more neural differentiation than ES., EES is a rare, aggressive, malignant soft tissue tumor with high recurrence rate and mainly occurring in adolescents and young adults between 10 and 30 years of age. The breast is uncommonly involved.
In 1975, Angervall and Enzinger reported the first case of extra-osseous ES. The most common sites are chest wall, paravertebral region, retroperitoneal space, lower extremities, and gluteal region. However, few cases have been reported in the kidney, breast, gastrointestinal tract, prostate, endometrium, the adrenal glands, brain, and lungs.
We report the case of a 25-year-old female with recurrent EES/PNET of the breast with mammogram, ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging findings.
| Case Report|| |
A 25-year-old female was referred to our institute with a history of diagnostic incisional lumpectomy for right breast lump in August 2014 which on histopathology was diagnosed to be a high-grade sarcoma. After surgery, there was a gradually increasing lump in the right breast.
Mammogram [Figure 1] revealed a large lobulated dense mass in the area of palpable abnormality in the upper inner quadrant of right breast.
|Figure 1 (A and B): Mammogram of right breast, cranio-caudal (A) and medio-lateral oblique (B) views shows a lobulated dense mass in the in the upper inner quadrant|
Click here to view
US [Figure 2] showed a large multilobulated solid cystic mass in the upper inner quadrant of the right breast involving the overlying skin with high vascularity and subcentimeter sized lymph nodes were seen in the right axilla.
|Figure 2 (A and B): Ultrasound (A) shows a large multilobulated hypoechoic to anechoic solid - cystic lesion. Ultrasound-guided biopsy (B) of the lesion was performed|
Click here to view
Contrast-enhanced MRI [Figure 3] of breast showed a large multi-lobulated heterogeneously enhancing mass lesion in the upper inner quadrant (1–4 o'clock position) of the right breast involving the overlying skin. The lesion appeared hypointense on T1-weighted and inhomogeneously iso- to hyper-intense on T2-weighted images. A cystic/necrotic component with peripheral enhancement was seen along the anterior aspect of the mass. Posteriorly, the mass was extending up to the pectoralis muscle.
|Figure 3 (A-H): The multilobulated lesion in the right breast appears hypointense on T1-weighted (A) and hyperintense on T2-weighted (B) and fat-saturated T2-weighted sequences (C) images and shows heterogeneous enhancement with few areas of necrosis within (D). It shows diffusion restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging and is dark on apparent diffusion coefficient maps (E and F). Maximum intensity projection (G) and colored maps (H) depicting the lesion|
Click here to view
PET-CT (performed at an interval of 10 days, [Figure 4]) revealed a large lobulated heterogeneously enhancing mass measuring approximately 11.6 cm × 9.2 cm × 6 cm in the medial half of the right breast reaching up to the presternal area and involving the overlying skin as well as underlying chest wall. The lesion showed intensely increased fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake with maximum standardized uptake values of 18.24. Two small indeterminate lung nodules were also seen in the right lung parenchyma which were too small to be characterized. No size significant hypermetabolic right axillary lymph nodes were noted.
|Figure 4 (A-D): (A and B) Positron emission tomography–computed tomography images revealed a large heterogeneously enhancing lesion in the right breast with intense fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, (C and D) two small indeterminate pulmonary nodules (white arrows) were seen in the right lung parenchyma|
Click here to view
US-guided biopsy revealed a tumor comprising of neoplastic cells arranged around blood vessels and in sheets. Individual cells were small with scant, pale eosinophilic to finely vacuolated cytoplasm and fairly uniform round nuclei with coarse chromatin and inconspicuous nucleolus [Figure 5]. Few mitotic figures were seen. Tumor cells demonstrate the presence of intracellular glycogen. On immunohistochemistry (IHC): Tumor cells are: CD99 (Dako; 1.20E + 008): Positive, leucocyte common antigen (Dako; 21B11 + PD7/26): Negative, CK (Biogenix: AE1 + AE3): Negative, S-100 (Dako; IS504): Negative, Desmin (Dako; D33): Negative, Bcl-2 (Dako; 124): Positive. The morphological features and IHC profile favored an EES/PNET.
|Figure 5 (A-D): Histology and immunohistochemistry (A) CD99-positive, (B) H and E, ×10: Small round cells arranged in sheets and perivascular location and inset picture H and E, ×40: Pale eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm and fairly uniform nuclei, (C) vimentin: Positive, (D) periodic acid-Schiff: Intracellular glycogen present|
Click here to view
The patient was started on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) and post four cycles of chemotherapy there was more than 50% reduction in the size of the lesion [Figure 6].
|Figure 6 (A and B): (A and B) Positron emission tomography-computed tomography images postchemotherapy status showed reduction in the size and fluorodeoxyglucose avidity of the breast lesion|
Click here to view
The patient underwent a wide local excision of the right breast in February 2015.
| Discussion|| |
ES and PNET form a single group of bone and soft-tissue tumors with typical undifferentiated ES at one end of the spectrum and PNET with clear evidence of neural differentiation at the other. EES/PNET presenting as a breast mass is uncommon, with only a few cases been reported in the literature., The majority of patients with EES/PNET are 10–20 years old, and other small studies of adult EES/PNET from the Royal Marsden, the Memorial Sloan Kettering, and the Dana Faber Cancer Centers have reported a median age of 24–27 years.,, Our patient fell into the second age group.
Imaging modalities such as mammogram, US, MRI and PET-CT help in diagnosis, however, the imaging findings are nonspecific. The diagnosis is usually confirmed by histopathological and IHC examination.
Findings from mammography and ultrasonography breast images are variable as they could vary from a hypoechoic mass with a posterior enhancement to a heterogeneous mass with necrotic areas., On mammography, a dense lobulated mass is usually seen. The reported CT finding of EES is most commonly a heterogeneously enhancing mass.,, Occasionally, a central, nonenhancing, low-density necrotic area is seen within the mass. On MRI, EES is generally of low to isointense signal intensity compared to muscle on T1-weighted images, of high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and exhibits heterogeneous enhancement.,, Our case showed similar imaging findings on MRI. However, it is stated that the MR findings of this tumor are nonspecific. In our case, the fat plane between the lesion and the chest wall was maintained on MRI, thus, ruling out the possibility of exophytic chest wall sarcoma. The utility of FDG-PET imaging has not been well established in the diagnosis and staging of soft tissue sarcoma. Our patient showed intensely increased FDG uptake. However, a case report of EES of the breast by Kim et al. showed falsely negative results on the PET scan.
EES/PNET is an aggressive tumor with a high incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis. A combination of multiple modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, are the most appropriate treatment.. All members of the ESFT tend to share the propensity for metastatic spread. Consistent use of systemic chemotherapy to treat localized ESFT effectively improved the 5-year survival rate from 5% to 10% to up to 65%, which is primarily due to the elimination of micrometastases., In patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, palliative chemotherapy may be useful.
The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of ES/PNET is unclear. However, the use of radiation therapy combined with surgery, to control local disease, is proving to be helpful. In our case, the patient was put on neoadjuvant chemotherapy which resulted in more than 50% reduction of the tumor size and then a wide local excision of right breast was done. Bone scintigraphy has a role in ruling out local bone infiltration and skeletal metastasis.
| Conclusion|| |
We report a case of recurrent EES/PNET presenting as a breast lump. Multiple imaging modalities such as mammogram, US, MRI, and PET-CT were used for diagnosis, and the definitive diagnosis was made by histopathological and IHC examination. MRI and PET-CT play a complimentary role in assessing local tumor resectibility and presence of metastatic disease. The EES/PNET of the breast is radiologically indistinguishable from other soft tissue tumors such as malignant phyllodes and therefore should be kept in the differentials for a recurrent/rapidly growing breast/chest wall soft tissue lesion.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Avcu S, Akdeniz H, Bora A, Arslan H, Unal O. Primary extraskeletal ewing sarcoma originating from chest wall in a child. Eur J Gen Med 2010;7:101-3.
Isefuku S, Seki M, Tajino T, Hakozaki M, Asano S, Hojo H, et al.
Ewing's sarcoma in the spinal nerve root: A case report and review of the literature. Tohoku J Exp Med 2006;209:369-77.
Shin JH, Lee HK, Rhim SC, Cho KJ, Choi CG, Suh DC. Spinal epidural extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma: MR findings in two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:795-8.
Basma EE, Hajar H, Nabil M, Anis B, Samir B. Breast Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor: A case report and a review of the literature. Breast 2012;3:WMC003792.
Tamura G, Sasou S, Kudoh S, Kikuchi J, Ishikawa A, Tsuchiya T, et al.
Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the breast: Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ
hybridization. Pathol Int 2007;57:509-12.
Thomas A, Blohmer JU, Sezer O, Fischer T, Thiel G, Dietel M. et al.
Peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of the breast a 6-year follow-up. Breast Care 2006;1:324-7.
Baldini EH, Demetri GD, Fletcher CD, Foran J, Marcus KC, Singer S. Adults with Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor: Adverse effect of older age and primary extraosseous disease on outcome. Ann Surg 1999;230:79-86.
Martin RC 2nd
, Brennan MF. Adult soft tissue Ewing sarcoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumors: Predictors of survival? Arch Surg 2003;138:281-5.
Verrill MW, Judson IR, Harmer CL, Fisher C, Thomas JM, Wiltshaw E. Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor in adults: Are they different from Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor in children? J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2611-21.
da Silva BB, Lopes-Costa PV, Pires CG, Borges RS, da Silva RG Jr. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the breast. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;137:248-9.
Maxwell RW, Ghate SV, Bentley RC, Soo MS. Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:1331-3.
Toh KL, Tan PH, Cheng WS. Primary extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma of the external genitalia. J Urol 1999;162:159-60.
Chang SK, Wang TL, Teh M. Extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma presenting with pulmonary embolism. Australas Radiol 1996;40:175-8.
Balakrishnan R, Khairullah QT, Giraldo A, Provenzano R. Extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma in a kidney transplant patient. Am J Kidney Dis 1999;33:1164-7.
Lim TC, Tan WT, Lee YS. Congenital extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma of the face: A case report. Head Neck 1994;16:75-8.
Guyot-Drouot MH, Cotten A, Flipo RM, Lecomte Houcke M, Delcambre B. Contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the diagnosis of extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1999;66:516-9.
Thebert A, Francis IR, Bowerman RA. Retroperitoneal extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma with renal involvement: US and MRI findings. Clin Imaging 1993;17:149-52.
Kim YS, Lee KH, Choi SJ, Cho YU, Cho SG, Kim MY, et al.
Extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma of the breast, mimicking cyst. J Korean Surg Soc 2010;79:411-4.
Paulussen M, Ahrens S, Dunst J, Winkelmann W, Exner GU, Kotz R, et al.
Localized Ewing tumor of bone: Final results of the cooperative Ewing's sarcoma study CESS 86. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:1818-29.
Rosito P, Mancini AF, Rondelli R, Abate ME, Pession A, Bedei L, et al.
Italian cooperative study for the treatment of children and young adults with localized Ewing sarcoma of bone: A preliminary report of 6 years of experience. Cancer 1999;86:421-8.
Dr. Anushri Parakh
C-6/59 A, Safdarjung Development Area, Opposite IIT Gate, New Delhi - 110 016
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||2851 |
| Printed||30 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||224 |
| Comments ||[Add] |