|
|
Year : 2000 | Volume
: 10
| Issue : 3 | Page : 177-179 |
|
Radiological quiz : GU imaging |
|
Rashmi Dixit, Anjali Prakash, Veena Chowdhury, Deep Shikha, Sumedha Pawa, Anju Garg
Dept of Radiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Med College, New Delhi - 110 002, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
|
|
 |
|
How to cite this article: Dixit R, Prakash A, Chowdhury V, Shikha D, Pawa S, Garg A. Radiological quiz : GU imaging. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2000;10:177-9 |
How to cite this URL: Dixit R, Prakash A, Chowdhury V, Shikha D, Pawa S, Garg A. Radiological quiz : GU imaging. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2000 [cited 2021 Feb 26];10:177-9. Available from: https://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2000/10/3/177/30591 |
A twenty-one-years old woman presented with complaints of lower abdominal discomfort, dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. No history of previous trauma or intervention could be elicited. Ultrasound and Doppler were performed on a Diasonics 2D gateway system [Figure - 1],[Figure - 2].
View Answer
Radiological Diagnosis | |  | Pelvic Arterio-Venous MalformationThe color Doppler findings show tortuous vessels in the adnexal region with markedly prominent vessels in the myometrium. On the basis of these findings, a diagnosis of pelvic arteriovenous malformation (AVM) was made. CT angiography was performed and revealed a soft tissue enhancing mass with enlarged tortuous vessels in both adnexal regions and in the uterine myometrium involving the uterus and vagina but without involvement of the bladder or rectum [Figure - 3]. The AVM was fed by branches of the internal iliac arteries on both sides and also by ovarian vessels [Figure - 4]. AVMs of the female pelvis are uncommon. The etiology may be congenital, traumatic, malignant or idiopathic [1] Congenital AVMs are considered to be undifferentiated vascular structures resulting from the arrest of embryonic development at various stages [2]. Acquired AVMs are usually caused by neoplasms or trauma and procedures such as curettage and uterine surgery have been implicated [3]. Symptoms include vaginal bleeding, throbbing discomfort in the lower abdomen, dyspareunic menorrhagia, shortness of breath, frequency of micturition and incontinence. Pelvic examination may reveal a poorly defined pulsatile adnexal mass. The uterus is occasionally soft and enlarged [5]. The gray scale ultrasound morphology of uterine AVMs includes prominent parametrial vessels, subtle myometrial inhomogeneity and multiple distinct anechoic spaces in the myometrium without mass effect. Other features include a focal mass effect within the myometrium or endometrial cavity that mimics a fibroid or polyp respectively and a cervical mass [8]. Color Doppler US features show intense color with extensive color aliasing and apparent flow reversal, while spectral Doppler shows slow resistance high velocity flow. While color Doppler and spectral Doppler interrogation of the uterus can strongly suggest the presence of an AVM, the ability of Doppler US to depict the precise extent of the lesion within the pelvis may be limited even with transvesical or endovaginal ultrasound. Doppler US however is the initial method of choice and the preferred method for following up patients after treatment [8]. Angiography is the current reference standard for the diagnosis of pelvic AVM. Although angiography can accurately define both the size of the AVM and vessel involvement it cannot accurately define adjacent organ involvement. The involvement of adjacent pelvic viscera is the major criterion in deciding between surgical extirpation and palliative embolotherapy. CT has been used to assess the size, extent and vascularity of AVMs and the degree of involvement of adjacent organs [5]. MR imaging may also be performed to confirm the diagnosis and delineate the extent of AVM. Management of pelvic AVMs is either by transcatheter embolisation or surgery or both [8].
References | |  |
1. | Palmez JC, Newton TH, Reuter SR, Bookstein JJ. Particulate 122. |
2. | Natakli J, Jue DP, Kieffer E et al . Sonographic diagnosis of arteriovenous malformation of the uterus and pelvis. JCU 1983; 11:295-298. |
3. | Diwan RV, Brennan JN, Selin MA et al . Sonographic diagnosis of arteriovenous malformation of the uterus and pelvis. JCU 1983; 11:295-298. |
4. | Torres WE, Stones PJ Jr, Thames FM. Ultrasound appearance of pelvic arteriovenous malformation. JCU 1979; 7:385-393. |
5. | Fakhri A, Fishman EK, Mitchell SE, Siegelman SS, White RI. The role of CT in the management of pelvic arteriovenous malformations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1987; 10:96-99 [PUBMED] |
6. | Amparo EG, Higgins CB, Hricak H. Primary diagnosis of abdominal arteriovenous fistula by MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8:1140-1142. [PUBMED] |
7. | Musa AA, Hata T, Hata K, Kitao M. Pelvic arteriovenous malformation diagnosed by color flow doppler imaging. AJR 1989; 152:1311-1312. |
8. | Huang MW, Muradali D, Thurston WA, Burns PN, Wilson SR. Uterine arteriovenous malformations: Gray scale and Doppler US features with MR imaging correlation. Radiology 1998; 206:115-123. [PUBMED] |

Correspondence Address: Rashmi Dixit C-116, East End Apartment, Mayur Vihar Phase I Extn. New Delhi - 110 096 India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
 
Figures
[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4] |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article Access Statistics | | Viewed | 3468 | | Printed | 103 | | Emailed | 0 | | PDF Downloaded | 0 | | Comments | [Add] | |
|

|