Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging

THORACIC IMAGING
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 380--388

Dilemma of diagnosing thoracic sarcoidosis in tuberculosis-endemic regions: An imaging-based approach. Part 2


Ashu S Bhalla1, A Das1, P Naranje1, A Goyal1, R Guleria2, Gopi C Khilnani2,  
1 Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Sleep Disorders, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ashu S Bhalla
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
India

Abstract

The second part of the review discusses the role of different existing imaging modalities in the evaluation of thoracic sarcoidosis, including chest radiograph, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endobronchial ultrasound, and positron emission tomography. While summarizing the advantages and pitfalls of each imaging modality, the authors propose imaging recommendations and an algorithm to be followed in the evaluation of clinically suspected case of sarcoidosis in tuberculosis-endemic regions.



How to cite this article:
Bhalla AS, Das A, Naranje P, Goyal A, Guleria R, Khilnani GC. Dilemma of diagnosing thoracic sarcoidosis in tuberculosis-endemic regions: An imaging-based approach. Part 2.Indian J Radiol Imaging 2017;27:380-388


How to cite this URL:
Bhalla AS, Das A, Naranje P, Goyal A, Guleria R, Khilnani GC. Dilemma of diagnosing thoracic sarcoidosis in tuberculosis-endemic regions: An imaging-based approach. Part 2. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 22 ];27:380-388
Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2017/27/4/380/220499


Full Text



 Imaging Modalities



The second part of the review deals with choosing and planning optimum imaging modality in clinical scenario of sarcoidosis versus tuberculosis (TB). An imaging algorithm to the effect has also been proposed.

Chest radiograph

Frontal or postero-anterior (PA) chest radiograph (CXR) is usually the first imaging investigation ordered by the physician as a part of the diagnostic workup for sarcoidosis. In fact, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy on CXR has been described as characteristic for sarcoidosis in an asymptomatic patient or in conjunction with features of Lofgren syndrome, i.e., erythema nodosum, fever, and arthralgia. Moreover, the earliest staging system for sarcoidosis described by Siltzbach was based on the findings on CXR and has still remained the most widely used system mainly because of its immense prognostic significance.[1] The Siltzbach staging system incorporates five stages of the disease [2] with increasing stage being associated with decline of pulmonary function culminating in pulmonary fibrosis. Stage 0 corresponds to normal appearance on CXR; stage 1 with only lymphadenopathy; stage 2 with lymphadenopathy and parenchymal lung disease; stage 3 involves parenchymal lung disease only; and stage 4 with fibrosis. CXR may also be used for routine follow-up of patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis to assess changes in parenchymal and nodal disease with low radiation exposure.[3]

CXR-PA forms an important tool in the diagnostic algorithm for suspected TB in population. Findings on CXR which are highly suggestive (HS) of TB include unilateral hilar/paratracheal lymphadenopathy with or without parenchymal lesions, miliary nodules, and fibro-cavitary lesions.[4] In adults also, CXR-PA is an important component of diagnostic algorithm for TB in national TB control programs. CXR findings such as consolidation/air–space involvement with ipsilateral lymphadenopathy, thick-walled cavities, and empyema are HS of TB.[5] However, radiographic features such as mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy, parenchymal nodules, and fibrosis are nonspecific (NS) and may be seen in sarcoidosis or TB.

Though CXR with concordant microbiology can suffice for the diagnosis of TB, the same may not be applicable to suspected cases of sarcoidosis, especially in TB-endemic regions if administration of steroid is being planned. Hence, exclusion of TB in patients presenting with mediastinal lymphadenopathy on CXR becomes imperative before initiation of treatment, thereby underlining the role of supplementary imaging, i.e., computed tomography (CT) scan of thorax [Figure 1].{Figure 1}

Computed tomography

High-resolution CT (HRCT) has proven to have better efficacy in assessing subtle parenchymal changes, even in early stages of sarcoidosis which may go unnoticed on CXR-PA. Recommended indications of CT in sarcoidosis include atypical clinical manifestations or unusual CXR findings, normal CXR with clinical suspicion of sarcoidosis, detection of complications including pulmonary hypertension, mycetoma formation, airway involvement, and as a pre-transplant workup for end-stage pulmonary fibrosis.[3] HRCT has been found to be particularly useful in differentiation of active inflammation from fibrosis, a question of immense clinical and prognostic significance. In cases with atypical radiographic or clinical manifestations, findings on HRCT may help in solving the dilemma by demonstrating characteristic findings.[6] HRCT also suffices for follow-up in patients with equivocal radiographic findings, in correlation with pulmonary functions test (PFT).

Although administration of intravenous (IV) contrast is not routinely recommended in sarcoidosis, it may aid in better depiction of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and in patients with vascular complications such as massive hemoptysis or pulmonary hypertension.[7] IV contrast administration is especially helpful in differentiation of sarcoidosis from TB by detection of intranodal necrosis and mapping of the lymph nodal stations. Thus, in endemic regions, contrast enhanced CT (CECT) chest would have to be performed in all suspected cases of sarcoidosis with nodal involvement on CXR to exclude TB [Figure 1].

Indications of CT in TB include detection of radiographically occult disease, evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes, assessing disease activity, evaluating complications and may aid in differentiation among the etiologies of pneumonia. Moreover, CT findings can help suggest the diagnosis of TB in sputum-negative patients and may permit empirical initiation of anti-TB treatment until the time culture results are obtained.

The role of CT in routine follow-up of sarcoidosis patients is not well defined mainly because of the attendant higher radiation exposure and the relatively younger patient age group. It is, therefore, advisable to use CT judiciously as a follow-up imaging modality depending upon patient age and clinical manifestations.[3] CT may also be used to objectively quantify the involvement of pulmonary parenchyma and airway separately, thereby complimenting the results of PFT.[3] Studies have found significant negative correlation between HRCT scoring systems and pulmonary function parameters, indicative of a decline in lung function with disease progression–a finding of immense prognostic significance.

Last but not the least, CT is required before performing endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of lymph node in both suspected TB and sarcoidosis. It also allows selection of appropriate site for transbronchial lung biopsy in sarcoidosis. The extent of parenchymal involvement on CT in terms of pattern and distribution can predict the likelihood of positive transbronchial biopsy in sarcoidosis.[8]

Endobronchial ultrasound

EBUS is the newest addition to the available armamentarium of diagnostic imaging modalities in mediastinal lymphadenopathy. EBUS coupled with fine needle aspiration is now a routinely performed procedure for sampling enlarged mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Not only does it replace other more invasive procedures like mediastinoscopy but arguably compares with the established diagnostic procedures. Certain studies have compared the endosonographic features of mediastinal lymph nodes in TB and sarcoidosis and found that the sonographic features of heterogeneous echotexture or coagulative necrosis within the lymph nodes are fairly specific for TB and along with a positive tuberculin skin test, these features strongly favor a diagnosis of TB over sarcoidosis.[9]

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRI is yet another addition to the available imaging modalities for the evaluation of suspected sarcoidosis/TB. With the availability of newer technical innovations in performing MRI of the thorax, its applications in chest imaging have widened. Presence of necrosis is an important differentiating feature between TB and sarcoidosis. MRI has a greater sensitivity to gadolinium than CT has for iodine, and thus contrast-enhanced (CE) MR can accurately detect subtle enhancement and necrosis. MRI also provides multiple paradigms for detection of necrosis: signal detection on T2 weighted (T2W) sequence, enhancement pattern, and diffusion characteristics [Figure 2]. Role of MRI in TB is described as a problem-solving modality to better evaluate mediastinal lymph nodes and assess disease activity in cases of mediastinal nodes/fibrosis.[5] Conventional sequences (T1 and T2W images) should be combined with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and subtracted CE imaging for optimal evaluation.{Figure 2}

Previously, lung parenchyma could not be adequately evaluated with MRI because of paucity of proton in lung parenchyma as well as significant susceptibility artifacts from air-filled lung. But recent technical advances in MR image acquisition and processing have made MR evaluation of pulmonary parenchyma feasible.[10] Chung et al.[11] in their study on 29 subjects of sarcoidosis showed good correlation between MRI and CT in scoring gross parenchymal opacification and reticulation with least agreement in case of pulmonary nodules attributed to the lower inherent spatial resolution of MRI. Agreement was also found to be more in upper lobe disease as opposed to lower lobe disease due to motion artifacts generated by diaphragmatic movements and cardiac pulsation.

Studies in TB have shown that MRI is comparable to CT for identifying morphological pulmonary changes; and that MRI is superior to CT regarding tissue characterization. Furthermore, based on lesion signal intensity, MRI could differentiate the exudative stage of lung TB from the relatively acellular fibrotic stage because of the relatively “short T2” in fibrotic tissues.[12]

Recent studies have used gadolinium enhancement characteristics to assess pulmonary fibrosis in sarcoidosis as opposed to its anatomical depiction on HRCT in terms of traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, and reticulation. In their recently published data, Darragh Brady et al.[13] used a segmented inversion-recovery turbo FLASH MR sequence with individual pulmonary blood pool nulling to detect fibrotic pulmonary sarcoid. Mean signal intensity in fibrotic lung parenchyma of sarcoid patients was found to be significantly higher (46.3 ± 36.2) as compared to normal lung parenchyma (11.1 ± 2.0, P < 0.001). Late enhanced MRI showed significant correlation with HRCT in detecting the extent of pulmonary fibrosis but not fine reticulations or honeycombing. These findings can have significant clinical implications especially in the face of growing concern associated with ionizing radiation, and sarcoidosis being a disease of the young requiring repeated imaging. A multiplanar and multisequence protocol consisting of breath-hold and free breathing sequences is preferred.[11],[14] Fat-saturated sequences are an essential component of the protocol as they enhance the conspicuity of fluid as well as ghosting artifact of chest wall [12] (STIR and T2W multivane fat suppressed in the suggested protocol). Fast sequences (HASTE) with short acquisition times are recommended.[14] TruFISP enables study of respiratory mechanics and noncontrast evaluation of mediastinal vessels.[11] The examination should also include CE sequences (T1 DIXON) and DWI to complete the assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes, pulmonary nodules, and masses.[14] Based on the available literature and institutional experience, the following MR protocol is suggested for the evaluation of suspected sarcoidosis or tuberculosis [Table 1].{Table 1}

Positron emission tomography (PET)

F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scan shows tracer uptake in areas of active inflammation in sarcoidosis, which has been used to identify occult site of involvement and suitable sites for biopsy.[15],[16] In addition, it also enables assessment of active inflammatory sarcoidosis in patients with chronic persistent symptoms, potentially predicting the reversible stage of disease as well as monitoring the response to corticosteroid treatment.[17],[18] This modality has particularly been useful is assessment of active extrathoracic sites of sarcoidosis such as liver, spleen, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, and myocardium.[17]

Active TB shows increased uptake with high standardized uptake values and may pose as a cancer mimic. PET may help in assessing the disease activity and response to therapy in cases of proven TB. Although it is not specific for TB, FDG PET/CT can guide biopsy from active sites, assess complete disease extent, and detect occult distant involvement.[3]

Widespread use of this modality is, however, marred by its non-specificity as similar positive uptake may be shown by malignancy or other active inflammatory conditions, the excessive radiation burden, and economic considerations.[17] Hence, PET/CT does not feature in the routine diagnostic algorithm for evaluation of sarcoidosis or TB.

 Imaging Recommendations



The authors, hereby, wish to conclude by suggesting the imaging recommendations for diagnosis of suspected sarcoidosis in TB-endemic regions [Table 2], and imaging findings considered to be highly suggestive of sarcoidosis, TB, or non-specific [Table 3] and [Table 4], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8] followed by an imaging-based algorithm [Figure 9].{Table 2}{Table 3}{Table 4}{Figure 3}{Figure 4}{Figure 5}{Figure 6}{Figure 7}{Figure 8}{Figure 9}

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Siltzbach LE. Sarcoidosis: Clinical features and management. Med Clin North Am 1967;51:483-502.
2Hillerdal G, Nöu E, Osterman K, Schmekel B. Sarcoidosis: Epidemiology and prognosis–a 15-year European study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;130:29-32.
3Greco FG, Spagnolo P, Muri M, Paladini I, Chizzolini F, Piciucchi S, et al. The value of chest radiograph and computed tomography in pulmonary sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2014;31:108-16.
4Kumar A, Gupta D, Nagaraja SB, Singh V, Sethi GR, Prasad J, et al. Updated current (2012) national guidelines for paediatric tuberculosis in India. J Indian Med Assoc 2012;110:840-3.
5Bhalla AS, Goyal A, Guleria R, Gupta AK. Chest tuberculosis: Radiological review and imaging recommendations. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2015;25:213-25.
6Hamper UM, Fishman EK, Khouri NF, Johns CJ, Wang KP, Siegelman SS. Typical and atypical CT manifestations of pulmonary sarcoidosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;10:928-36.
7Nunes H, Brillet PY, Valeyre D, Brauner MW, Wells AU. Imaging in sarcoidosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2007;28:102-20.
8de Boer S, Milne DG, Zeng I, Wilsher ML. Does CT scanning predict the likelihood of a positive transbronchial biopsy in sarcoidosis? Thorax 2009;64:436-9.
9Dhooria S, Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Bal A, Gupta N, Gupta D. Differentiating tuberculosis from sarcoidosis by sonographic characteristics of lymph nodes on endobronchial ultrasonography: A study of 165 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:662-7.
10Kauczor HU, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Ley S. Imaging of pulmonary pathologies: Focus on magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2009;6:458-63.
11Chung JH, Little BP, Forssen AV, Yong J, Nambu A, Kazlouski D, et al. Proton MRI in the evaluation of pulmonary sarcoidosis: Comparison to chest CT. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:2378-85.
12Rizzi EB, Schinina V, Cristofaro M, Goletti D, Palmieri F, Bevilacgua N, et al. Detection of pulmonary tuberculosis: Comparing MR imaging with HRCT. BMC Infect Dis 2011;11:243.
13Brady D, Lavelle LP, McEvoy SH, Murphy DJ, Gallagher A, Gibney B, et al. Assessing fibrosis in pulmonary sarcoidosis: Late-enhanced MRI compared to anatomic HRCT imaging. QJM 2016;109:257-64.
14Hochhegger B, de Souza VV, Marchiori E, Irion KL, Souza Jr AS, Elias Junior J, et al. Chest magnetic resonance imaging: A protocol suggestion. Radiol Bras 2015;48:373-80.
15Braun JJ, Kessler R, Constantinesco A, Imperiale A. 18F-FDG PET/CT in sarcoidosis management: Review and report of 20 cases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:1537-43.
16Teirstein AS, Machac J, Almeida O, Lu P, Padilla ML, Iannuzzi MC. Results of 188 whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in 137 patients with sarcoidosis. Chest 2007;132:1949-53.
17Sobic-Saranovic D, Artiko V, Obradovic V. FDG PET imaging in sarcoidosis. Semin Nucl Med 2013;43:404-11.
18Mostard RL, Voo S, van Kroonenburgh MJ, Wijnen PA, Nelemans PJ, Drent M, et al. Inflammatory activity assessment by F18 FDG-PET/CT in persistent symptomatic sarcoidosis. Respir Med 2011;105:1917-24.