Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging

: 2011  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 38--45

Pictorial essay: Congenital anomalies of male urethra in children

Manisha Jana, Arun K Gupta, Kundum R Prasad, Sandeep Goel, Vishal D Tambade, Upasna Sinha 
 Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Manisha Jana
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029


Congenital anomalies of the male urogenital tract are common. Some lesions like posterior urethral valve or anterior urethral diverticulum tend to present early in infancy and are often easily diagnosed on conventional contrast voiding cystourethrograms. Other conditions like posterior urethral diverticulum or utricle can be relatively asymptomatic and therefore present late in childhood. We present the spectrum of imaging findings of common and uncommon anomalies involving the male urethra. Since the pediatric radiologist is often the first to make the diagnosis, he or she should be well aware of these conditions.

How to cite this article:
Jana M, Gupta AK, Prasad KR, Goel S, Tambade VD, Sinha U. Pictorial essay: Congenital anomalies of male urethra in children.Indian J Radiol Imaging 2011;21:38-45

How to cite this URL:
Jana M, Gupta AK, Prasad KR, Goel S, Tambade VD, Sinha U. Pictorial essay: Congenital anomalies of male urethra in children. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 May 30 ];21:38-45
Available from:

Full Text


Congenital anomalies of the urogenital tract are among the commonest anomalies found in the fetus, neonate, and infant. [1] Most of these anomalies can be easily diagnosed by conventional contrast voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), retrograde urethrogram (RGU), intravenous urography (IVU), or nuclear imaging, and can be successfully treated with a good outcome. Hence, the radiologist should be aware of not just the common but also the uncommon congenital anomalies and their imaging correlates; this requires a good knowledge of the anatomy and embryology of the genitourinary tract.

Of the congenital anomalies of the urogenital tract, many involve the male urethra [Table 1], sometimes with associated anomalies of the external genitalia or anorectal malformations. This article attempts to give a pictorial overview of the congenital anomalies of the male urethra in children.{Table 1}


The male urethra can be divided into a proximal pelvic urethra and a distal phallic urethra. The pelvic urethra (prostatic and membranous urethra) develops from the urogenital sinus. The phallic urethra (bulbar and penile part) develops from the degeneration of the urethral plate and ventral fusion of the urethral folds between the 8th and 12 th week of gestation. [2]

 Congenital Conditions


Hypospadias is the most common congenital urethral anomaly. It is sometimes associated with other urogenital abnormalities. The urethral meatus is located on the ventral surface, anywhere from the penile shaft to the penoscrotal region, and is associated with a dorsal chordee [Figure 1].{Figure 1}


Epispadias can be isolated or seen as part of the exstrophy-epispadias complex. The urethral meatus is located dorsally on the penile shaft [Figure 2]. In severe forms associated with exstrophy, there is a deficient lower anterior abdominal wall and anterior urinary bladder wall, a small phallus, and widely divergent pubic bones [Figure 3]. The ureters take an abnormal lateral and upward curvature at the terminal part to give a hooked or "Hurley-stick appearance." [3] {Figure 2}{Figure 3}

Congenital urethral duplication

Urethral duplication can be divided into the following types: [4],[5] type I, blind and incomplete; type IIA, complete patent duplication, with two meati; type IIB, complete patent duplication, with both the urethrae joining distally and opening through a single meatus; and type III, urethral duplication occurring as part of a very rare anomaly termed complete caudal duplication. [6] In complete caudal duplication, the bladder is usually completely divided in the sagittal plane, each half receiving one (ipsilateral) ureter and having a separate urethra [[Figure 4] A-B]. Rarely, there may be a single urethra leading to outlet obstruction of one of the bladders. [7],[8] Urethral duplication commonly occurs in the sagittal plane, though rare cases of duplication in the coronal plane have also been reported. [9] Duplication of the urethra could be partial [Figure 5] or complete [Figure 6] and either hypospadiac or epispadiac [Figure 7], depending on the relation of the accessory channel with the orthotopic urethra. In the rare epispadiac type, there is a dorsal accessory urethral opening and the child is usually incontinent.{Figure 4}{Figure 5}{Figure 6}{Figure 7}

H- or N-type recto- or anoprostatic urethral fistula

This is an extremely rare type of anorectal malformation. There is a fistulous communication between the prostatic urethra and the anterior wall of the rectum or anus. Typically, the urethra distal to the site of the fistula is narrow and stenotic, resulting in a poor urinary stream. [10] Some studies suggest that the ventral urethra is usually functional in all cases of hypospadiac urethral duplication, whereas in congenital urethroperineal fistula the dominant urinary stream is through the dorsal orthotopic channel. [11]

Rectourethral fistula associated with anorectal malformation

Congenital rectourethral fistula is usually associated with the high and intermediate type of anorectal malformations. A contrast study, either through the colostomy or via retrograde urethrography, demonstrates the fistulous tract in most patients. The fistulous communication is between the blind-ending rectum and either the bulbar urethra [Figure 8] and [Figure 9] or, more commonly, the prostatic urethra. [10],[12]{Figure 8}{Figure 9}

Posterior urethral valve

Posterior urethral valves (PUVs) are the commonest cause of bladder outlet obstruction in a male child. [2] This condition may be diagnosed antenatally, in the neonatal period, or later, with the age at presentation depending on the degree of obstruction. Though earlier divided into three types, [13] currently only one type (formerly called type I) is recognized. PUVs can only be diagnosed with a VCUG and not with retrograde urethrography. VCUG shows a disproportionately dilated posterior urethra, with an abrupt transition into a narrow anterior urethra, bladder neck hypertrophy, and trabeculation/sacculation of the bladder [Figure 10] and [Figure 11], usually with a small capacity; also, there may or may not be associated vesicoureteric reflux. In high-grade obstruction, a neonate may present with perirenal urinoma, dysplastic kidneys, or urinary ascites. [14],[15] Nowadays, the entity is termed congenital obstructive posterior urethral membrane (COPUM).{Figure 10}{Figure 11}

Posterior urethral polyp

Posterior urethral polyp, a rare cause of intermittent urethral obstruction, [16] is an elongated pedunculated polypoid lesion attached to the verumontanum. On VCUG, the lesion appears as a lucent filling defect that moves downwards during micturition.

Prostatic utricle

The prostatic utricle is a small, blind-ending midline pouch arising from the prostatic urethra at the level of the verumontanum [Figure 12]. It represents the remnant of the caudal end of the fused Mόllerian ducts. [17] A large prostatic utricle may be associated with urinary retention, stasis, and infection. It can be associated with hypospadias or the prune belly syndrome. [18]{Figure 12}

Posterior urethral diverticulum

Most posterior urethral diverticulae are acquired in origin and lined with columnar epithelium or granulation tissue. A congenital posterior urethral diverticulum is a rare entity [Figure 13]. A large diverticulum may be complicated by urinary stasis, infection, and calculi formation.{Figure 13}

Anterior urethral diverticulum

An anterior urethral diverticulum is a saccular outpouching arising from the ventral surface of the anterior urethra. Two types are described. Most commonly it arises from the ventral surface of the bulbar urethra [Figure 14] and [Figure 15]. The other rarer type is found located near the penile tip [Figure 16] and has a short neck. The former usually presents with obstruction [19],[20],[21] to the urinary stream, while the latter is more prone to calculus formation.{Figure 14}{Figure 15}{Figure 16}

Anterior urethral valve

An anterior urethral valve is a posteriorly directed semilunar fold arising from the floor of the anterior urethra and causing urethral obstruction during micturition. On imaging, it can mimic an anterior urethral diverticulum, but the posterior lip is absent in a valve.

Congenital megalourethra

This is a rare congenital anomaly resulting from the faulty development of the corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum. Two types are described. The milder and commoner form, scaphoid megalourethra, results from a localized underdevelopment or deficiency of the corpus spongiosum [Figure 17], [22],[23] with intact corpora cavernosa. Fusiform megalourethra is the rarer, more severe, form in which there is deficiency of the corpora cavernosa as well as the corpus spongiosum, [22],[24] resulting in diffuse dilatation of the penile urethra [Figure 18].{Figure 17}{Figure 18}

Prune belly syndrome

This refers to a constellation of anomalies, including lax abdominal wall musculature, cryptorchidism, and various lower urinary tract anomalies. [25],[26],[27] The posterior urethra is typically dilated, high-placed, and tapered distally; the appearance may mimic a posterior urethral valve [[Figure 19] A-C].{Figure 19}

Congenital meatal stenosis

Congenital meatal stenosis is most frequently associated with hypospadias. On VCUG, the entire urethra up to the meatus is dilated [Figure 1].


A number of congenital conditions can affect the male urethra, and the diagnosis is predominantly based on VCUG, RGU, and USG. Congenital causes of urethral obstruction like PUV can be diagnosed on antenatal USG or MRI. Though VCUG may be essential for diagnosis, radiation issues should be taken into consideration when performing the investigation in a newborn or an infant.


1Steinhardt JM, Kuhn LP, Eisenberg B. Ultrasound screening of healthy infants for urinary tract abnormalities. Pediatrics 1998;82:609-12.
2Bates DG. The bladder and urethra. In: Slovis TL, editor. Caffey's Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging. 11 th ed. Philadelphia PA: Elsevier; 2008. p. 2356-91.
3Goenka AH, Jain V, Sharma R, Gupta AK, Bajpai M. MR diagnosis of penile agenesis: is it just absence of a phallus? Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:1109-12.
4Effmann EL, Lebowitz RL, Colodny AH. Duplication of urethra. Radiology 1976;119:179-85.
5Bhadury S, Parashari UC, Singh R, Kohli N. MRI in congenital duplication of urethra. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2009;19:232-4.
6Esham W, Holt HA. Complete duplication of bladder and urethra: a case report. J Urol 1980;123:773-5.
7Dunetz GN, Bauer SB. Complete duplication of bladder and urethra. Urology 1985;25:179-82.
8Cheng EY, Maizels M. Complete duplication of the bladder and urethra in the coronal plane: case report. J Urol 1996;155:1414-5.
9Urakami S, Igawa M, Shiina H, Shigeno K, Yoneda T, Yagi H. Congenital collateral urethral duplication in the frontal plane. The J of Urol 1999;162:2097-8.EE
10Gupta AK. Imaging of Anorectal Anomalies. In: Subbarao K, Benerjee S, Aggarwal SK, Bhargava SK, editors. Diagnostic Radiology and Imaging. 2 nd ed. Vol 1. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd; 2003. p. 441-55.
11Bates DG, Lebowitz RL. Congenital urethroperineal fistula. Radiology 1995;194:501-4.
12Gupta AK, Bhargava S, Rohtagi M. Anal agenesis with rectobulbar fistula. Pediatric Radiol 1986;16:222-4.
13Young HH, Frontz WA, Baldwing JC. Congenital obstruction of the posterior urethra. J Urol 1919;3:289-354.
14Chatterjee SK, Banerjee S, Basak D, Basu AK, Chakravarti AK, Chatterjee US, et al. Posterior urethral valves: the scenario in a developing center. Pediatr Surg Int 2001;17:2-7.
15McPherson RI, Leithiser RE, Gordon L, Torner WR. Posterior urethral valves: an update and review. Radiographics 1986;6:753-91.
16Caro P, Rosenberg H, Snyder HM 3 rd . Congenital urethral polyp. Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:1041-2.
17Hoffman AD, LeRoy AJ. Uroradiology: procedures and anatomy. In: Kelalis PP, King LR, Belman AB, editors. Clinical pediatric urology. 3 rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1992. p. 66-116.
18Moore KL. The urogenital system. In: Moore KL, editor. The developing human: clinically oriented embryology. 3 rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1982. p. 255-97.
19Kirks DR, Grossman H. Congenital saccular anterior urethral diverticulum. Radiology 1981;140:367-72.
20Gupta DK, Srinivas M. Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2000;16:565-8.
21Enriquez G, Garcia-Pena P, Lucaya J, Herrera M, Toran N. Congenital diverticula of the anterior urethra. Ann Radiol 1978;21:207-14.
22Berrocal T, López-Pereira P, Arjonilla A, Gutiérrez J. Anomalies of the distal ureter, bladder, and urethra in Children: embryologic, radiologic, and pathologic Features. Radiographics 2002;22:1139-64
23Kester RR, Woopan UM, Ohm HK, Kim H. Congenital megalourethra. J Urol 1990;4:1213-5.
24Wakhlu AK, Wakhlu A, Tandon RK, Kureel SN. Congenital megalourethra. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:441-3.
25Jennings RW. Prune belly syndrome. Semin Pediatr Surg 2000;9:115-20.
26Aaronson IA, Cremin BJ. Prune belly syndrome in young females. Urol Radiol 1980;1:151-5.
27Soylu H, Kutlu NO, Sonmezgoz E, Bukte Y, Ozgen UU, Akinci A. Prune-belly syndrome and pulmonary hypoplasia: a potential cause of death. Pediatr Int 2001;43:172-5.