Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 3338

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY Table of Contents   
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 253-257
Computed tomography guided radio-frequency ablation of osteoid osteomas in atypical locations


1 Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri- Columbia, 1100 Virginia Ave, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA
2 Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri- Columbia; University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, One Hospital Drive, 1100 Virginia Ave, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA
3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Missouri Orthopedic Institute, University of Missouri–Columbia, 1100 Virginia Ave, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ambarish P Bhat
One Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_259_19

Rights and Permissions

Purpose: Percutaneous radio-frequency ablation is a minimally invasive treatment option for osteoid osteomas. The ablation process is straightforward in the more common locations like the femur/tibia. Surgery has historically been the gold standard, but is currently used in lesions, that may not be effectively and safely ablated, i.e. close to skin/nerve. Radio-frequency ablation can still be used in such cases along with additional techniques/strategies to protect the sensitive structures and hence improve the outcomes. The authors describe their experience with four challenging osteoid osteoma ablation cases. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed radio-frequency ablations of four osteoid osteomas in rather atypical locations, the protective techniques/strategies employed, the adequacy and safety of the radio-frequency ablation with the use of these techniques. Results: All patients had complete resolution of pain with no recurrence in the follow-up period. No complications were reported. Conclusion: RFA has been proven to be an effective and safe option for treatment of OOs in the common locations. It is generally recommended to have a 1 cm safety margin between the RF probe and any critical structures in the vicinity. However, with OOs in atypical locations this may not be always possible and hence additional techniques may be needed to ensure protection of the surrounding sensitive structures and also allow for effective ablation.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
  Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
  Reader Comments
  Email Alert *
  Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed155    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded41    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal