Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 3803

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

WOMENS IMAGING Table of Contents   
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 163-167
Conventional and magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal patency—A comparative study


Department of Radiodiagnosis, Kilpauk Medical College, Kilpauk, Chennai, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Devimeenal Jagannathan
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Kilpauk Medical College, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_109_18

Rights and Permissions

Context: Tubal factors, one of the leading causes of female infertility, have been conventionally evaluated by hysterosalpingography (HSG). The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing female infertility is gaining importance because of its inherent efficiency in detecting structural abnormalities. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography (MR HSG) is less invasive and avoids exposure of ovaries to ionizing radiation. Its utility is extrapolated to visualize fallopian tubes. Aims: To assess the diagnostic accuracies of dynamic MR HSG and conventional HSG (cHSG) in identifying tubal patency in women with infertility using diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) as gold standard. Materials and Methods: A prospective study of 40 patients was conducted over a period of 6 months. The patients were subjected to MR HSG followed by cHSG during the preovulatory period. If tubes were blocked, the patients were subjected to DL in the next menstrual cycle. If the tubes were patent and there was failure of conception, they were subjected to DL in the interval of 3 months. Results: Twenty-four patients had bilateral tubal spill which was confirmed using cHSG and DL. One patient had discordant MR HSG and cHSG results and six patients had discordant MR HSG and DL results. No statistical difference was observed between MR HSG and cHSG. Conclusion: Pelvic MRI is an inevitable tool in infertility evaluation. MR HSG can be used in addition as it avoids exposure of the reproductive organs to radiation and has the same efficacy as cHSG.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
  Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
  Reader Comments
  Email Alert *
  Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1056    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded243    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal