Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 3180

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     


Year : 2018  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 280-284
Plain CT vs MR venography in acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: Triumphant dark horse

1 Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India
2 Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Kasturba Medical College (KMC), Manipal, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Kasturba Medical College (KMC), Manipal, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Poornima Digge
Assistant Professor, Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_328_17

Rights and Permissions

Context: Most patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) present with nonspecific signs and symptoms and are likely to undergo nonenhanced head computed tomography (NCT) at presentation, which may show a normal report in up to two-thirds of patients. However, in case of acute thrombosis, sensitivity of diagnosing CVST is high as sinuses are hyperdense. Though magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing CVST, it is not universally available in an acute setting. Aims: To evaluate whether increased attenuation in cerebral venous sinuses in acute condition can be used to diagnose acute CVST and to determine its diagnostic value. Materials and Methods: The study involves two independent groups. One group of patients with sinus thrombosis were confirmed by MR venography (group A). The other group included patients without sinus thrombosis (group B). The HU (CT attenuation), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), and H: H (HU: HCT) ratio of both groups were compared. Thirty-six patients (59 thrombotic sinuses) were studied in group A and 40 in group B. Statistical Analysis: Average HU and H: H ratio were compared using two-tailed t-test, and linear regression analysis was used to assess correlation between HCT and HU. Results: Average HU (73.7 vs 48.6) and H: H ratio values were higher in group A patients compared to group B (P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis showed positive correlation between HGB and HCT with HU among both the groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that acute CVST can be diagnosed using HU values in NCT.

Print this article     Email this article

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
  Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
  Reader Comments
  Email Alert *
  Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded410    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal