Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 2986

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     


MISCELLANEOUS Table of Contents   
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 263-266
Clinical radiology: Going an extra mile for patient care

1 Department of Radiodiagnosis, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Radiodiagnosis, Command Hospital Air Force, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Upendra Kumar Joish
Department of Radiodiagnosis, JJM Medical College, Davangere - 577 004, Karnataka
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_145_17

Rights and Permissions

Context: Clinical details help radiologists report accurately. However, the clinical aspect has taken a backseat among radiologists, who are overdependent on referral notes. This leads to inaccurate assessment, financial burden, and loss of man hours. Aims: To re-emphasize the benefits of detailed clinical evaluation and real-time monitoring of imaging in interpreting images. Settings and Design: Prospective study. Materials and Methods: A study was done in the Department of Radiodiagnosis for 10 days, including all referred patients above 18 years of age. Detailed history taking and examination was done by radiologists prior to imaging. Any additional significant clinical detail was endorsed on the referral slips. Appropriate imaging modality under given circumstances was carried out. Imaging was studied by the radiologists, near simultaneously with the acquisition. Any additional imaging needed was performed on the same day. Comprehensive reports with specific outputs were provided. Wherever apt, imaging-guided management options were offered to the patients. Results: During the study, 1024 patients with mean age of 46.3 years underwent various types of imaging, including radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound scans, and fluoroscopic procedures. Additional clinical details were endorsed in referral slips in 32.4% patients, 53% of which helped in interpreting images appropriately. Primary imaging modality was changed in 3% patients. Additional imaging was done in 10.9% patients. 3.6% of patients underwent imaging-guided procedures. Conclusion: Detailed history taking and examination help radiologists in deciding appropriate imaging and better interpretation of images. This will also reduce the number of visits to the hospital and expenditure on part of patients.

Print this article     Email this article

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
  Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
  Reader Comments
  Email Alert *
  Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded112    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal