Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 1563

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO THE EDITOR  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 259-260
Author reply


Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication30-Jun-2017
 

How to cite this article:
Indiran V. Author reply. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2017;27:259-60

How to cite this URL:
Indiran V. Author reply. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 May 28];27:259-60. Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2017/27/2/259/209223
Sir,

I read with interest, the article “Solid renal masses in adults” by Mittal et al.[1] I would like to add as well as reiterate certain practical points with respect to the same. As mentioned by the authors, fat containing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and angiomyolipomas (AML) are close differentials, especially in cases of lipid poor AML. Enhancement features on computed tomography (CT) are equivocal in differentiating these lesions. I would like to the recall the role of positron emission tomography (PET) CT in differentiating RCC and AML, as emphasized by Lin et al.[2] Of the 21 AMLs included in the study, none of them showed a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of more than 1.98.[2] Kim et al., in their study, found that 25 of the 27 RCC had SUVmax of >3.06 ± 0.45.[3]

As mentioned by the authors, intrarenal transitional cell carcinomas (TCC) and central RCCs are very close differentials and distinguishing them in imaging practice is difficult but essential. Findings such as tumor epicenter in collecting system, focal filling defect in renal pelvis, renal shape preservation, absence of cystic areas/necrosis, homogeneous contrast enhancement, and extension toward pelviureteric junction are quite favorable towards diagnosis of TCC, as established by Raza et al.[4]

Ultrasound elastography also appears to have a role in distinguishing benign and malignant lesions. Onur et al., in their study involving 71 solid renal masses, recognized that the mean strain index value of malignant lesions was significantly higher than that of benign lesions.[5]

Renal pseudotumors, especially nodular compensatory hypertrophy, may be diagnosed unequivocally using non contrast magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion weighted images.[6],[7] Goyal et al. found that none of the pseudotumors showed restricted diffusion; whereas restricted diffusion was seen in all the solid RCCs. Diffusion weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient values is very helpful in lesion characterization, especially in the setting of chronic kidney disease.

Nevertheless, as emphasized by the Mittal et al., lesion characterization by imaging is definitely difficult in smaller masses <1.5 cm, necessitating close monitoring with follow-up imaging.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Mittal MK, Sureka B. Solid renal masses in adults. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016;26:429-42.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Lin CY, Chen HY, Ding HJ, Yen KY, Kao CH. FDG PET or PET/CT in Evaluation of Renal Angiomyolipoma. Korean J Radiol 2013;14:337-42.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Kim JS, Lim ST, Jeong YJ, Kim DW, Jeong HJ, Sohn MH. The characteristics of renal cell carcinoma in F-18 FDG PET/CT: Relation to TNM staging, grading and other renal malignant neoplasm. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1269.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Raza SA, Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, Bharwani N, Heenan S, Verma H, et al. Centrally infiltrating renal masses on CT: Differentiating intrarenal transitional cell carcinoma from centrally located renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:846-53.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Onur MR, Poyraz AK, Bozgeyik Z, Onur AR, Orhan I. Utility of semiquantitative strain elastography for differentiation between benign and malignant solid renal masses. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34:639-47.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Indiran V. Magnetic resonance imaging as problem-solving tool in renal pseudotumor in chronic kidney disease: A case of nodular compensatory hypertrophy. Indian J Nephrol 2016;26:470-1.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
7.
Goyal A, Sharma R, Bhalla AS, Gamanagatti S, Seth A. Pseudotumours in chronic kidney disease: Can diffusion-weighted MRI rule out malignancy. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1870-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Venkatraman Indiran
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_506_16

Rights and Permissions




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1248    
    Printed13    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded64    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal