Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 1683

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

BREAST Table of Contents   
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 229-236
Role of exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in characterizing breast lesions by 3.0 Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging


1 Department of Radio Diagnosis, IPGME and R and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Surgery, IPGME and R and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
3 Department of Pathology, IPGME and R and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
4 Department of Pharmacology, IPGME and R and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Correspondence Address:
Shweta Kothari
Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial (IPGME and R and SSKM) Hospital, 243/244 A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata - 700 020, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_405_16

Rights and Permissions

Objective: To evaluate the role of exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a tool for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Patients and Methods: This prospective observational study included 88 breast lesions in 77 patients (between 18 and 85 years of age) who underwent 3T breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm2 before biopsy. Mean exponential ADC and ADC of benign and malignant lesions obtained from DWI were compared. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was undertaken to identify any cut-off for exponential ADC and ADC to predict malignancy. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Histopathology was taken as the gold standard. Results: According to histopathology, 65 lesions were malignant and 23 were benign. The mean ADC and exponential ADC values of malignant lesions were 0.9526 ± 0.203 × 10−3 mm2/s and 0.4774 ± 0.071, respectively, and for benign lesions were 1.48 ± 0.4903 × 10−3 mm2/s and 0.317 ± 0.1152, respectively. For both the parameters, differences were highly significant (P < 0.001). Cut-off value of ≤0.0011 mm2/s (P < 0.0001) for ADC provided 92.3% sensitivity and 73.9% specificity, whereas with an exponential ADC cut-off value of >0.4 (P < 0.0001) for malignant lesions, 93.9% sensitivity and 82.6% specificity was obtained. The performance of ADC and exponential ADC in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions based on respective cut-offs was comparable (P = 0.109). Conclusion: Exponential ADC can be used as a quantitative adjunct tool for characterizing breast lesions with comparable sensitivity and specificity as that of ADC.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
  Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
  Reader Comments
  Email Alert *
  Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1905    
    Printed37    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded122    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal