Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 2052

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

 Table of Contents    
WOMEN’S IMAGING  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 59-61
Fetal intra abdominal umbilical vein varix: Case series and review of literature


Department of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication27-Mar-2017
 

   Abstract 

Fetal intraabdominal umbilical vein varix (FIUV) is focal dilatation of the intrabdominalumbilical vein of thefetus.It appears as a round or fusiform cystic structure in thefetal abdomen, which shows continuity with the umbilical vein ongrayscale andcolor Dopplerimaging. The diagnostic criteria include the FIUV varix diameter at least 50% wider than the diameter of the intrahepatic umbilical veinand an intraabdominal umbilical vein diameter exceeding 9 mm orgreater than twostandard deviations above the mean for gestational age. We report three cases, two cases with isolated FIUV and favorable outcome and the third case with FIUV and atrioventricular septal defect, where trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) was diagnosed.

Keywords: Antenatal ultrasound; fetal anomalies; trisomy 21; umbilical vein varix

How to cite this article:
Lallar M, Phadke SR. Fetal intra abdominal umbilical vein varix: Case series and review of literature. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2017;27:59-61

How to cite this URL:
Lallar M, Phadke SR. Fetal intra abdominal umbilical vein varix: Case series and review of literature. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 6];27:59-61. Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2017/27/1/59/202964

   Introduction Top


Fetalintraabdominal umbilical vein varix (FIUV) is an uncommon but easily detectable ultrasonographic finding.[1],[2] Counselling for outcome is a challenge becauseoutcomes are variable. Though the outcome may be satisfactory, cases with fetal structural anomalies, chromosomal anomalies, orfetal hydrops with adverse pregnancy outcomes have been reported.

We report our experience with three cases of FIUV varix and review the available literature.


   Case Report Top


Three cases of umbilical vein varix were identified at our referral centre from 2012 to 2015. The first patient was a 32-year-old, fifth gravida, with 32-week pregnancy who presented with intrauterine growth restriction; she reported three previous intrauterine deaths in late third trimester (cause unknown). FIUV was identified with a diameter of 14.2 mm (normal diameter of umbilical vein: 7–8 mm). ColorDoppler analysis showed turbulent flow in the varicose segment. There were no other structural abnormalities in the fetus. The umbilical artery Doppler was normal. Weekly serial sonographic and Doppler monitoring of pregnancy was performed. Patient delivered a healthy female at 37 weeks by elective caesarean section. The child is now 2 years old and is developmentally normal [Table 1]; [Figure 1].
Table 1: Ultrasonographicfindings and neonatal outcome in fetuses with FIUV

Click here to view
Figure 1: FIUV measuring 14.2 mm and showing normal color flow on Doppler

Click here to view


The second patient was a 28-year-old, 21-week pregnant, second gravida who referred with triple test showing high risk for neural tube defects (>1:50 on triple test, AFP of more than 2.5 MoM). On ultrasonography, isolated FIUV varix measuring 9.7 mm was identified with no other abnormalities. Patient did not opt for invasive testing. Follow-up ultrasound at 31 weeks showed varix size of 9.8 mm with normal Doppler study. She delivered a healthy male after elective caesarean section at term. The child is now 8 months of age and is developmentally normal.

The third patient was a 26-year-old, 19-week pregnant, second gravida who referred with high risk of trisomy 21 on triple test (1:214). On ultrasonography, fetus was found to have a FIUV of diameter 9 mm. The FIUV showed turbulent flow on colour Doppler. An atrioventricular canal defect was also detected in the fetus. Amniocentesis was done and trisomy 21 was detected on fetal karyotyping. The pregnancy was terminated.


   Discussion Top


Of the three cases with FIUV, two cases with isolated FIUV had a normal outcome. In the third patient with atrioventricularcanal defect and FIUV, fetal karyotyping showed trisomy 21 (Down syndrome). Umbilical vein varix corresponds to approximately 4% of the malformations of the umbilical cord. FIUV represents focal dilatation of the extrahepatic intraabdominal part of the fetal umbilical vein. It appears as a round or fusiform cystic structure in the fetal abdomen between the inferior part of the liver and the anterior abdominal wall. Among the intraabdominalumbilical vein varices, extrahepatic intraabdominal varices are more common than intrahepatic intraabdominal varices, probably due to lack of liversupport in the extrahepatic region. The diameter of the umbilical vein increases linearly from 3 mm at 15 weeks to 8 mm at term. The diameter of most umbilical veinvarices is between 6 and 12 standard deviations (SD) above the mean umbilical vein diameter for the patient's gestational age.[2],[3] Extremely large varices of up to 85 mm have been reported.[4]

Till date more than 200 cases have been reported in the literature [Table 2].[5],[6],[7],[8] The results of four large case series on FIUV by Rahemtullh et al., Byers et al., Fung et al., and Lee et al. are compiled in [Table 2]. Out of 218 FIUV cases, 170 had normal outcome (78%). Eighteen fetuses (8.3%) had major malformations. Five cases with FIUV had trisomy 21 and one had triploidy. Except one case, all fetuses with trisomy 21 had ultrasonographically detected major abnormalities, as was the situation in our case. Intrauterine deaths were reported in 7 cases, one of these was trisomy 21. Approximately18% of the pregnancies had obstetrical complications. Twin-to-twin transfusion and twin-reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) and three cases of isoimmunizationneed special mention because FIUV may be the effect of hemodynamic manifestation of these causes.
Table 2: Larger case series of FIUV fetuses and their outcome

Click here to view


The complications of FIUV are rupture, thrombosis, compression of the umbilical artery and other veins, and cardiac failure due to vascular stealing by the varix and increased preload. Hence, close serial ultrasonography and Doppler monitoring is required.[9]


   Conclusion Top


Detection of FIUV calls for careful screening of malformations by ultrasound. Monitoring for growth and wellbeing is required. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities is approximately 2.8% in fetuses with FIUV.[3],[5],[6],[7],[8] In absence of malformations, usually the prognosis is favorable. Fetal karyotyping needs to be offered if there are other abnormalities observed on ultrasound. Isolated FIUV does not warrant fetal karyotyping.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Varix of the umbilical vein. In: Nyberg DA, McGahan JP, Pretorius DH, Pilu G, editors. Diagnostic imaging of fetal anomalies. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 114-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Weissman A, Jakobi P, Bronshtein M, Goldstein I. Sonographic measurements of the umbilical cord and vessels during normal pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med 1994;13:11-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mahony BS, McGahan JP, Nyberg DA, Reisner DP. Varix of the fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein: Comparison with normal. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:73-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fuster JS, Benasco C, Saad I. Giant dilatation of the umbilical vein. J Clin Ultrasound 1985;13:363-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rahemtullah A, Lieberman E, Benson C, Norton ME. Outcome of pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis of umbilical vein varix. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:135-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Fung TY, Leung TN, Leung TY, Lau TK. Fetal intra-abdominal vein varix: What is the clinical significance? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:149-54.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Byers BD, Goharkhay N, Mateus J, Ward KK, Munn MB, Wen TS. Pregnancy outcome after ultrasound diagnosis of fetalintra-abdominal umbilical vein varix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:282-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lee SW, Kim MY, Kim JE, Chung JH, Lee HJ, Yoon JY. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of antenatal fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix detection. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2014;57:181-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Zalel Y, Lehavi O, Heifetz S, Aizenstein O, Dolitzki M, Lipitz S, et al. Varix of the fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein: Prenatal sonographic diagnosis and suggested in utero management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:476-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shubha R Phadke
Department of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rai Bareilley Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.202964

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3631    
    Printed47    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded181    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal