Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 3448

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

 Table of Contents    
THORACIC IMAGING  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 23-32
Infectious pneumonia in the immunocompetent host: What the radiologist should know


Department of Radiodiagnosis, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication27-Mar-2017
 

   Abstract 

Lung infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly because of the rising antimicrobial resistance. According to the clinical setting, they can be categorized as community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Radiological patterns of lung infections are lobar consolidation, bronchopneumonia, interstitial pattern, and nodular pattern. In addition, typical imaging features of several infections serve as “red flag signs” in reaching a diagnosis or altering the management. It would be prudent for the radiologist to be well informed regarding these aspects of lung infections to be able to make a valuable contribution to the management.

Keywords: Imaging; immunocompetent; lung infections; pneumonia; radiological signs

How to cite this article:
Ghasi RG, Bajaj SK. Infectious pneumonia in the immunocompetent host: What the radiologist should know. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2017;27:23-32

How to cite this URL:
Ghasi RG, Bajaj SK. Infectious pneumonia in the immunocompetent host: What the radiologist should know. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 May 28];27:23-32. Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2017/27/1/23/202967

   Introduction Top


The most common question put up to an Indian radiologist in the setting of pulmonary infection is “does it look tubercular?” Once tuberculosis is ruled out, most of our job is considered done. We need to, however, contribute more to the diagnostic trail. Lung infections caused by organisms other than Mycobacterium tuberculosis, are, nevertheless, a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent times, there has been an alarming increase in drug resistance strains. Recent data from the Indian intensive care unit (ICU) setting shows that most of the pathogens are resistant to common antibiotics.[1] Empirical broad spectrum antimicrobial therapy is one of the causes responsible for this. Unusual infections are encountered more frequently now because of increased survival in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients, incidence of organ transplants, and emergence of newer viruses with atypical imaging features. Radiologists need to be more aware about the dominant imaging patterns in different types of these infections and the “red flag” imaging signs which make a difference to the management.


   Clinical Setting Top


The most widely referenced guidelines in pneumonia are the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines. A consensus guideline document was issued by these two societies in 2007.[2] Among its various recommendations was the development of locally adapted guidelines. Accordingly, Indian Chest Society and National College of Chest Physicians (India) developed national pneumonia guidelines.[3] As per the IDSA/ATS guidelines, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is defined as “an acute infection of the pulmonary parenchyma that is associated with at least some symptom of acute infection, accompanied by the presence of an acute infiltrate on a chest radiographor auscultatory findings consistent with pneumonia, in a patient not hospitalized or residing in a long-term care facility for more than 14 days before the onset of symptoms.[2] The definition itself includes confirmation by chest radiograph (moderate recommendation, level III evidence). The role of the radiologist is, therefore, to confirm the presence of lung infiltrate and its severity. In simple cases, if the clinical improvement upon treatment is satisfactory, then a follow-up radiograph is not recommended (Strong recommendation, level II evidence).[3] Computed tomography (CT) scan is not routinely indicated in the diagnosis of CAP (strong recommendation, level II evidence).[3]

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is defined as pneumonia occurring ≥48 hours after admission not incubating at the time of admission. Related terms are ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP) and healthcare associated pneumonia (HCAP). VAP refers to pneumonia that arises after more than 48 hours of endotracheal intubation. As per the IDSA/ATS consensus statement, HCAP includes any patient who was hospitalized in an acute care hospital for 2 or more days within 90 days of the infection; resided in a nursing home or long-term care facility within the past 30 days of the current infection. HCAP is included in the spectrum of HAP and VAP, and patients with HCAP need therapy for MDR pathogens.[2],[4] In the Indian scenario, similar long-term health care facilities are uncommon and the term HCAP is avoided in the ICS/NCCP (I) guidelines.[3] The diagnosis of HAP/VAP is made by the presence of signs and symptoms to acute infection with appearance of new or progressive infiltrate on the chest radiograph or by positive culture samples. It can be divided into early or late HAP/VAP depending upon whether the pneumonia occurs within or after 4 days of admission/mechanical ventilation, respectively.[2] CT is not routinely indicated in the routine diagnosis of HAP/VAP (strong recommendation, level III evidence).[3]

A comparison of the pathogens responsible for CAP and HAP is presented in [Table 1]. Most common organism in both CAP and early onset HAP is Streptococcus pneumoniae. In more severe cases of CAP requiring inpatient care, additional organisms such as Legionella pneumophila and mixed infection in aspiration pneumonitis can be found. More virulent pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative bacilli (GNB) can be found in addition to the routine organisms in CAP patients requiring ICU care.[5] However, in India, it is not uncommon to find Methicillin-Resistant  S.aureus Scientific Name Search  (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Drug Resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP) in CAP isolates.[6] In late onset (>4 days) HAP, aerobic GNB and S. aureus are more common. Anaerobes, Legionella, Pneumocystis, tuberculosis, viruses, and fungi are uncommon causes and occur irrespective of the timing of acquiring HAP.
Table 1: Comparison of pathogens causing CAP and HAP

Click here to view



   Imaging Patterns Top


Lobar consolidation

Lobar pattern of consolidation occurs when the alveoli are filled with inflammatory exudate as host response to the infection. The exudate spreads across lung parenchyma through channels of collateral air drift, and hence the resultant lung opacity is homogenous and contiguous. There is no destruction of lung parenchyma and complete resolution occurs with treatment. The most common organism in CAP setting is S. pneumoniae. There is predilection for basal segments [Figure 1]. Less commonly, L. pneumophila may occur in hospitalized CAP patients. The infection begins as unifocal infiltrate but spreads bilaterally. The radiographic picture lags behind clinical status.[7],[8]
Figure 1: Coronal lung window image shows lobar pattern of consolidation in the right lower lobe. The upper margin of the consolidation is limited by oblique fissure. Air bronchogram is present

Click here to view


In HAP, the appearance can be more severe with the consolidation being bilateral and extensive. S. pneumoniae is the most common pathogen in early onset HAP. Klebsiella can also cause lobar pneumonia with typical “bulging fissure sign” due to copious exudates. Pseudomonas has a predilection for lung bases, often bilaterally, and a tendency for abscess formation. Extensive necrotizing pneumonia can be caused by S. aureus, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, and tuberculosis. Bilateral upper lobe consolidation with coalescent lucencies and “air crescent sign” can be seen [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Bilateral upper lobe consolidation with extensive necrosis and areas of cavitation. Blood culture in this patient was positive for S aureus

Click here to view


Aspiration pneumonia needs a special mention in the setting of HAP because here additional lung injury due to acidic gastric contents. Infection is mostly polymicrobial and begins in the distal dependent airways as bronchopneumonia, but can progress to lobar consolidation. Air bronchogram is mostly absent because of the aspirated content in the airways [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Lobar consolidation in right lower lobe due to aspiration. Air bronchogram is absent. Centrilobular nodules are seen in dependent location in left lower lobe also

Click here to view


In children, S. pneumoniae can cause a rounded mass-like pattern of consolidation. Children are also prone to hematogenous spread from Staphylococcal pyoderma. Staphylococcal pneumonia can commonly lead to complications such as lung abscess and empyema. It is important to differentiate the two because empyema requires drainage whereas medical therapy is curative for most lung abscesses.[7],[9] Empyema typically forms an obtuse angle with the lung parenchyma and shows “split pleura sign” on CECT due to enhancement of visceral and parietal pleura [Figure 4]A. Lung abscess forms acute angle with lung parenchyma and bronchovascular structures end on the wall of abscess rather than being splayed [Figure 4]B. In the healing phase, pneumatoceles can be seen as thin-walled air filled lung cysts [Figure 4]C, which can rupture to cause pneumothorax. Pneumatoceles are not specific for S. aureus because they can occasionally be seen in  Escherichia More Details coli, S. pneumonia, and Pneumocystis jiroveci infection. A variant strain of S. aureus named Panton Valentine Leukocidin toxin positive (PVL+ve) was discovered in 2002 and is more common in children than adults. There is a history of rapid deterioration of flu-like illness caused by alveolar hemorrhage and extensive necrotizing pneumonia [Figure 5].[7],[10]
Figure 4 (A-C): Right lobe Staphylococcal pneumonia. (A) lentiform fluid collection in right pleural cavity with thickening and enhancement of visceral and parietal pleura (split pleura sign) suggestive of empyema. (B) Cavity with air-fluid level in apical segment of right lower lobe. Bronchi are seen to end at the margin of the cavity (arrow) rather than being splayed, indicating intraparenchymal abscess. (C) Pneumatocele seen as a thin-walled air filled cyst

Click here to view
Figure 5: A 7-year-old child with 15 days history of cough, cold, and flu-like symptoms with rapid clinical deterioration requiring hospitalization. Large area of liquefied necrotic consolidation with cavitation in right lower lobe. PVL positive S. aureus should be considered in such patients

Click here to view


Bronchopneumonia

Bronchopneumonia begins in the distal airways as bronchiolitis with or without peribronchial inflammation. It is seen on chest radiograph as scattered infiltrates, which are frequently bilateral. The opacities are smaller because it is usually seen in the setting of virulent organisms and poor host response such as HAP and aspiration pneumonia. Smaller infiltrates can later form larger coalescent opacities [Figure 6]. On CT, bronchial wall thickening and centrilobular nodules suggesting infectious bronchiolitis can be seen initially. Apart from bacteria such as S. aureus, GNB, Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, fungal infections such as Aspergillus can also give rise to bronchopneumonic pattern.[7],[8]
Figure 6: Chest radiograph showing extensive and coalescent larger acinar opacities in bronchopneumonia

Click here to view


Interstitial pattern

Interstitial pattern results when there is cellular infiltrate in the alveolar septae and peribronchovascular interstitium. Ground glass opacity (GGO) is caused by incomplete alveolar filling. In the immunocompetent patient, interstitial pattern of pneumonia is caused by viruses and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Uncommon rickettsial infections such as scrub typhus should also be considered in the differential in appropriate endemic setting [Figure 7]A and [Figure 7]B.
Figure 7 (A and B): A 40-year-old patient with acute onset of fever with dyspnea, not resolving with antibiotics. (A) Interstitial pneumonia in the form of well-defined consolidation, ill-defined scattered acinar infiltrates with air bronchograms (asterisk), GGO, and diffuse micronodular pattern. (B) Adenopathy (open arrow) seen on mediastinal window. There were microabscesses in the liver and spleen and ascites. The serology was positive for scrub typhus. Significant reduction in the lung lesions was seen after tetracycline therapy

Click here to view


M. pneumoniae is a bacterial pathogen causing interstitial CAP. Bronchiolitis is the most distinct finding on CT, seen as poorly-defined centrilobular nodules. Areas of patchy air-space consolidation or GGO in lobular distribution, bronchopneumonia, thickening of the axial interstitium, and interlobular septa can be commonly seen.[11]

Viral pathogens are more commonly reported than previously estimated in CAP. Respiratory viruses were detected as a pathogen in 37.8% adult outpatients with LRTI in a recent study.[12] The range of viruses producing pneumonia in adults includes common agents, such as varicella-zoster virus and influenza virus, as well as respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, adenoviruses, picornaviruses, and coronaviruses. Adenoviruses more commonly cause severe multifocal pneumonia in institutionalized elderly patients.[13]

There is a considerable overlap in CT features of various types of viral pneumonias which are broadly described as (a) parenchymal attenuation disturbances, (b) GGO and consolidation, (c) nodules, micronodules and “tree-in –bud” opacities, (d) interlobular septal thickening, (e) nodules with halo sign, (f) pleural effusions, and (g) lymphadenopathy. GGO is the most common feature seen in almost all of the viral pneumonias, but is not a typical feature of adenoviruses.[14] The distribution of GGO is also important because subpleural and peribronchovascular predominance is a feature of H1N1 [Figure 8].[15],[16] The Patterns of pulmonary infiltration caused by Influenza viruses are most variable and do not significantly differ between immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients or between different types and subtypes of Influenza virus.[12],[17] Nodules and micronodules are seen in common viral infections such as influenza and parainfluenza viruses, measles, RSV, varicella, and CMV,

but are not common in H1N1, H5N1, enterovirus, and adenovirus. Septal thickening is a predominant feature in measles, Hantavirus, and SARS, but is not a typical feature of other more common viruses. Bronchial or bronchiolar wall thickening is common in RSV, measles, and adenovirus but not common in others. Pleural effusion and lymphadenopathy is an additional feature of measles virus not encountered with others. Nodules with “peripheral halo sign” are more typical of DNA viruses.[14]
Figure 8: A 40-year-old patient with fever, dry cough, headache, and dyspnea. Bilateral consolidation and GGO with subpleural and peribronchovascular predominance is seen. Throat swab was positive for H1N1

Click here to view


RSV is the most frequent viral cause of respiratory tract infection in infants. Acute bronchiolitis is the main presenting feature and lung hyperinflation is the predominant radiographic finding [Figure 9].
Figure 9: Chest radiograph in an infant with fever and respiratory distress shows features of bronchiolitis as hyperinflated lung fields and fine linear opacities due to atelectasis

Click here to view


Nodular pattern

Macronodular pattern can be seen in hematogenous infections such as septic emboli [Figure 10] or by granulomatous and fungal infections. Parasitic infections such as Paragonimiasis are not uncommon in the northeastern parts of India. The worm cysts are seen as nodules once the initial exudative or hemorrhagic consolidation has cleared.[18]
Figure 10: A 12-year-old child with septicemia. Multiple well-defined nodules, more in subpleural region and most of them show a “feeding vessel sign” (arrow), suggesting septic emboli. Cavitation is seen in many nodules

Click here to view


Associated abnormalities

Mediastinal adenopathy

Most nonnecrotic enlarged nodes associated with lung infections are reactive in nature. Necrotic nodes make a case for tuberculosis and in immunodeficiency state, fungal infections such as candidiasis.[19]

Pleural fluid

Parapneumonic effusions are common in S. pneumoniae. They resolve along with the pneumonia with antibiotic therapy and need drainage only if large causing lung collapse or loculated. Empyema develops when infection spreads to pleural cavity. Management of empyema is more aggressive with percutaneous or surgical drainage. Left untreated, pleural space is obliterated with enhancing thick visceral and parietal pleura with no intervening fluid. This can be treated only by surgical removal of the thick pleural peel.[7],[19]

Lung infections with pathognomic radiological appearances

Although all patterns of lung infection have a differential diagnosis, there are certain conditions with pathognomic radiological appearances.[19],[20],[21],[22] Examples are illustrated in [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13].
Figure 11: Supine and prone axial CT scans showing “air crescent” sign of a dependent fungal ball in old lung cavity

Click here to view
Figure 12: Coronal reconstructed CT image showing fluid filled branching bronchoceles or “gloved finger sign” in ABPA

Click here to view
Figure 13: Serpentine old calcified guinea worm in muscles of the chest wall in a 60-year-old female overlying the right lung shadow

Click here to view


The characteristic imaging signs seen in lung infections are summarised in [Table 2].
Table 2: Imaging signs in lung infections

Click here to view


Lung infection mimics and pitfalls

Various other conditions may mimic lung infections. A summary of the conditions with imaging pearls and red flag signs which help in differentiation are given in [Table 3], [Figure 14], [Figure 15],[Figure 16], [Figure 17], [Figure 18], [Figure 19].[8],[10],[19],[23],[24],[25],[26]
Table 3: Conditions mimicking lung infections with imaging pearls and red flag signs

Click here to view
Figure 14: Bilateral dependent consolidation with air bronchogram. There is an anteroposterior gradient from normal lung to GGO to consolidation suggesting ARDS in the appropriate clinical setting

Click here to view
Figure 15: Wedge-shaped subpleural GGO in both lung apices. CT pulmonary angiogram in the revealed right pulmonary artery thrombosis

Click here to view
Figure 16: “CT angiogram sign.” Lobar consolidation with homogenous low attenuation and visibility of pulmonary vasculature through it

Click here to view
Figure 17: A 50-year-old male patient with dry cough for 6 months. Patchy wedge-shaped GGO which tend to be subpleural in location. The S.IgE levels in this patient were markedly raised upto 1818 kU/L, suggestive of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia

Click here to view
Figure 18 (A and B): A 40-year-old male patient with cough and hemoptysis. (A, B) Combination of peripheral wedge-shaped GGO, consolidation, and cavity in left upper lobe (arrow), indicating a pulmonary vasculitis. ANCA was positive suggestive of granulomatous polyangitis

Click here to view
Figure 19 (A and B): A 5-year-old male child with recurrent right lower lobe pneumonia and episode of massive hemoptysis. (A) Mass-like consolidation with cavitation in right lower lobe, with caudal extension into the retroperitoneum. (B) CT angiography shows an arterial feeder from the celiac artery (arrow). Radionuclide examination was positive for ectopic gastric mucosa indicating an infected transdiaphragmatic duplication cyst

Click here to view


An algorithm summarizing the imaging approach to differential diagnosis is presented in [Figure 20].
Figure 20 (A and B): (A, B) Imaging algorithm for approach to differential diagnosis of infectious pneumonia in immunocompetent host

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


In conclusion, role of the radiologist in lung infections extends much beyond confirming the diagnosis of pneumonia and ruling out tuberculosis. International as well as Indian consensus guidelines on pneumonia have been laid down. Initial chest radiograph is sufficient to confirm the diagnosis. Ultrasound is a useful tool in pleural complications. CT is indicated in nonresolving, recurrent, or complicated infections, and for guided aspiration for sampling or drainage in selected nonresponders.[2],[3],[8] The dominant imaging pattern setting in which pneumonia is acquired and immune status are useful navigators in differential diagnosis. Although the imaging findings in various infections overlap, a practical approach in sync with management goals can be achieved.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Ghanshani R, Gupta R, Gupta B, Kalra S, Khedar R, Sood S. Epidemiological study of prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of infections in medical ICU at a tertiary care hospital in India. Lung India 2015;32:441.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Mandell L, Wunderink R, Anzueto A, Bartlett J, Campbell G, Dean N, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44(Suppl 2):S27-72.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Gupta D, Agarwal R, Aggarwal A, Singh N, Mishra N, Khilnani G, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of community-and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults: Joint ICS/NCCP(I) recommendations. Lung India 2012;29:27.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:388-416.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Dandagi G. Nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients. Lung India 2010;27:149.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
6.
Dhar R. Pneumonia: Review of guidelines. JAPI 2012;60:25-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Reynolds J, Mcdonald G, Alton H, Gordon S. Pneumonia in the immunocompetent patient. Br J Radiol 2010;83:998-1009.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nambu A, Ozawa K, Kobayashi N, Tago M. Imaging of community-acquired pneumonia: Roles of imaging examinations, imaging diagnosis of specific pathogens and discrimination from noninfectious diseases. World J Radiol 2014;6:779.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kuhajda I, Zarogoulidis K, Tsirgogianni K, Tsavlis D, Kioumis I, Kosmidis C. Lung abscess-etiology, diagnostic and treatment options. Ann Transl Med 2015;3:183.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bradley J, Byington C, Shah S, Alverson B, Carter E, Harrison C, et al. The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older Than 3 Months of Age: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:e25-76.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Reittner P, Müller N, Heyneman L, Johkoh T, Park J, Lee K, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia. AJR 2000;174:37-41.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Miller W, Mickus T, Barbosa E, Mullin C, Van Deerlin V, Shiley K. CT of Viral Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Adults: Comparison Among Viral Organisms and Between Viral and Bacterial Infections. AJR 2011;197:1088-95.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Cesario T. Viruses Associated With Pneumonia in Adults. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:107-13.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Franquet T. Imaging of Pulmonary Viral Pneumonia. Radiology. 2011;260(1):18-39.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Tasaka S. Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Adults and Adolescents: Current Concepts and Future Directions. Clin Med Insights 2015;9(S1):19-28.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Marchiori E, Zanetti G, D'Ippolito G, Verrastro C, de Souza Portes Meirelles G, Capobianco J et al. Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Viral Infection: Thoracic Findings on CT. AJR 2011;196:W723-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kloth C, Forler S, Gatidis S, Beck R, Spira D, Nikolaou K, et al. Comparison of chest-CT findings of Influenza virus-associated pneumonia in immunocompetent vs. immunocompromised patients. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:1177-83.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Martínez S, Restrepo C, Carrillo J, Betancourt S, Franquet T, Varón C, et al. Thoracic Manifestations of Tropical Parasitic Infections: A Pictorial Review. RadioGraphics 2005;25:135-55.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Beigelman-Aubry C, Godet C, Caumes E. Lung infections: The radiologist's perspective. Diagn Intervent Imaging 2012;93:431-40.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Franquet T, Müller N, Giménez A, Guembe P, de la Torre J, Bagué S. Spectrum of Pulmonary Aspergillosis: Histologic, Clinical, and Radiologic Findings1. RadioGraphics 2001;21:825-37.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Walker C, Abbott G, Greene R, Shepard J, Vummidi D, Digumarthy S. Imaging Pulmonary Infection: Classic Signs and Patterns. Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:479-92.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Menon B. Serpentine calcification: A radiological stigma. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2011;2:203.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
23.
Fishman JPrimack S. Thoracic imaging in the intensive care unit [Internet]. Appliedradiology.com. 2005 [accessed 27 July 2016]. Available from: http://www.appliedradiology.com.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Khan A, Hamdan A, AL-Ghanem S, Alaa G. Reading chest radiographs in the critically ill (Part II): Radiography of lung pathologies common in the ICU patient. Ann Thorac Med 2009;4:149.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
25.
Sheard S, Rao P, Devaraj A. Imaging of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Resp Care 2012;57:607-12.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lee K, Kim Y, Han J, Ko E, Park C, Primack S. Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: Clinical, histopathologic, and radiologic findings. Radio Graphics 1997;17:1345-57.  Back to cited text no. 26
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rohini G Ghasi
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.202967

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14], [Figure 15], [Figure 16], [Figure 17], [Figure 18], [Figure 19], [Figure 20]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Clinical Setting
   Imaging Patterns
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7223    
    Printed47    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded728    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal