Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 108

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

 Table of Contents    
ABDOMINAL IMAGING  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 13-22
Multimodality imaging of adult gastric emergencies: A pictorial review


1 Department of Body Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
2 Department of Body Imaging, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ohio, USA

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication27-Mar-2017
 

   Abstract 

Acute gastric emergencies require urgent surgical or nonsurgical intervention because they are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Imaging plays an important role in diagnosis since the clinical symptoms are often nonspecific and radiologist may be the first one to suggest a diagnosis as the imaging findings are often characteristic. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of multimodality imaging (plain radiograph, fluoroscopy, and computed tomography) of various life threatening gastric emergencies.

Keywords: CT; emergencies; fluoroscopy; gastric

How to cite this article:
Sunnapwar A, Ojili V, Katre R, Shah H, Nagar A. Multimodality imaging of adult gastric emergencies: A pictorial review. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2017;27:13-22

How to cite this URL:
Sunnapwar A, Ojili V, Katre R, Shah H, Nagar A. Multimodality imaging of adult gastric emergencies: A pictorial review. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Dec 17];27:13-22. Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2017/27/1/13/202957

   Introduction Top


Emergent gastric pathologic conditions can be catastrophic because they can cause perforation leading to spillage of gastric contents into the peritoneal cavity with associated high morbidity and mortality. Radiologists must be familiar with their imaging findings as the clinical presentation is varied. Gastric emergencies result from different pathophysiologic mechanisms such as distension, ischemia, perforation, obstruction, and infection/inflammation. Although computed tomography (CT) is the mainstay of diagnosis, conventional imaging modalities that include plain films and barium studies combined with fluoroscopy may provide clues to the diagnosis. In this article, we discuss gastric anatomy and clinical features along with a comprehensive review of multimodality imaging features of nontraumatic, noniatrogenic emergent conditions of the stomach.


   Gastric Anatomy Top


Stomach can be divided into five segments namely the cardia, fundus, body, antrum, and pylorus [Figure 1]A. The cardia surrounds the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Gastric fundus is the part of the stomach above a line drawn tangential to the GE junction. It is responsible for the “stomach bubble” seen on upright plain film and is the most dependent portion of the stomach in supine position. The body lies between the fundus and antrum and is the most distensible part of the stomach limited by the greater curvature, anteriorly and to the left, and lesser curvature posteriorly and to the right. The antrum is the thickest and most peristaltic part of the stomach. Incisura angularis is the transition point between the body and antrum and is seen as an indentation along the lesser curvature on fluoroscopic studies [Figure 1]. It is the most common site for gastric ulcers.[1] The pylorus is the gateway of stomach to the duodenum and contains the pyloric sphincter. The pylorus lies anteroinferior to the GE junction, is the narrowest part of the stomach, and is most commonly involved in gastric outlet obstruction (GOO).
Figure 1 (A and B): Normal gastric anatomy: Upper GI fluoroscopy image (A) showing the normal gastric anatomy including air filled fundus, body, incisura angularis (arrow), antrum, and pyloric canal. Axial CT image (B) showing normal wall thickness (<5 mm) of the gastric body

Click here to view


The stomach is a highly distensible structure with maximum holding capacity as high as 1.5 liters. On contrast-enhanced CT, the wall of the stomach has a trilaminar appearance owing to the presence of low attenuation submucosa sandwiched between enhancing mucosa and high attenuation muscularis propria plus serosa. This trilaminar appearance is also termed mural stratification.[2],[3] In an adequately distended stomach, the normal upper limit for wall thickness of the gastric body is 5 mm and that of antrum is 12 mm [Figure 1]B.[2] An underdistended stomach not only leads to false positive appearance of thickening of gastric wall but may also obscure some pathologies.


   Role of Imaging Top


When a patient presents to the emergency department (ED) with epigastric pain, abdominal radiograph is done as part of the initial work-up and can provide important clues such as free intraperitoneal air or acute gastric distension. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is invaluable in evaluation of the stomach and surrounding structures with excellent spatial resolution. It also helps in the evaluation of vascular anatomy and associated vascular pathologies such as arteriovenous malformation and varices. On table oral contrast, if feasible, can achieve gastric distension and can be helpful in evaluation of gastric perforation. Water is an excellent negative oral contrast and does not interfere with evaluation of mucosal enhancement. Ideally, 750 ml of water should be administered before 15 minutes and 250 ml just before scanning.[4] CT is limited by suboptimal mucosal detail as well as nondynamic evaluation, which can be achieved with fluoroscopic imaging. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) fluoroscopy with water-soluble contrast is very useful in suspected postoperative leaks and fistulas and evaluation of gastric bands. Gastric emergencies are summarized in [Table 1].
Table 1: Imaging findings in adult gastric emergencies

Click here to view


Gastric perforation

Gastric perforation is a surgical emergency with high mortality rates ranging 10–40%.[5],[6],[7] Lesser curvature is the most common site in cases of peptic ulcer as well as in acute gastric dilatation or necrosis.[8],[9] Extraluminal air with predominant upper abdomen distribution around the stomach and liver is the most common (97%) CT finding, however, it may not be detected in cases of very small or contained perforation.[10] Gastric wall defect and/or ulcer is the second most common CT feature (84%) followed by extraluminal oral contrast (0–27%).[10] Other CT features include wall thickening, adjacent fat stranding, and fluid.

Gastric perforation from peptic ulcer disease

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is the most common cause of nontraumatic gastric perforation.[11],[12] Ulcers along the anterior wall and curvatures perforate into the peritoneal cavity, whereas those along the posterior wall may lead to a contained perforation in lesser sac [Figure 2]. The most common presentation is severe upper abdominal pain. Signs of peritonitis including rigidity and guarding, and rebound tenderness may also be present depending on the location, extent, and duration of perforation. CT features include focal gastric wall thickening, ulcer defect, extraluminal air bubbles in contact with stomach or free intraperitoneal air, free fluid, adjacent fat stranding, oral contrast leakage, and wall discontinuity.[10] Free air around the liver and stomach and in the lesser sac are reliable signs of gastroduodenal perforation [Figure 2].[11]
Figure 2 (A-C): 42-year-old male with severe upper abdominal pain. Contrast enhanced axial CT (A) shows thickening of posterior wall of stomach (curved arrow) and extraluminal contrast in the lesser sac (black arrow). Perihepatic free air (white arrows in B), extraluminal contrast (black arrowhead in C) and mesenteric fat stranding (white arrowhead in C) are also noted. These findings are concerning for perforated gastric ulcer

Click here to view


Perforated gastric malignancy

Necrotic or ulcerated malignancies are the second most common cause of gastric perforation after peptic ulcers.[12] Adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) can lead to gastric perforation. Perforation in gastric adenocarcinoma is rare and seen in advanced stages but may also occur in early stages due to deep ulceration.[13] The risk factors associated with spontaneous rupture or perforation of GIST include an exophytic mass with areas of necrosis or cystic degeneration and rapid growth on follow-up imaging.[13] Hollow viscous perforations associated with lymphoma are more common in small bowel than in stomach.[14]

CT findings may include the features of gastric perforation, as discussed above, in combination with features of malignancy including nodular, focal, eccentric, or mass-like wall thickening and loss of trilaminar appearance due to replacement of submucosa with tumor cells [Figure 3]. Signs of secondary spread including lymphadenopathy, omental cake formation, and distant metastasis may also be detected on CT.
Figure 3 (A and B): 71-year-old male patient with gastric adenocarcinoma and perforation. Axial contrast enhanced multidetector CT (A, B) showing nodular thickening (arrowheads in A) of posterior wall of fundus of stomach with a defect in the wall (small arrow in A) and contrast extravasation in lesser sac (large arrows in A and B). Small amount of ascites is also noted. Asterisk denotes the intraluminal oral contrast in the stomach

Click here to view


Post-bariatric surgery perforation

Laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are the two most widely performed bariatric surgical procedures.[15] LAGB is a popular procedure involving placement of adjustable silicone gastric band 2 cm distal to the GE junction with formation of a small proximal pouch with capacity 15 ml.[15] The band diameter can be adjusted through a subcutaneous port in anterior abdominal wall.

Perforations associated with gastric banding can be seen soon after surgery or can be delayed for a few weeks. Early postsurgical gastric perforation is rare and is seen in 0.1–0.8% of cases.[15] Clinical presentation is extremely variable ranging from fever, abdominal pain, to signs of sepsis. Extraluminal air and contrast material and/or abscess may be seen on CT. Delayed perforation is seen at least after 3 weeks following the surgery and may be seen even after several months.[15] It usually results from gastric band erosion and is reported in up to 3% of the cases.[15] It may be a result of continuous pressure of band against the gastric wall, inflammatory foreign body reaction, infection, or use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.[15],[16] The clinical features include hematemesis, weight gain, and diffuse abdominal tenderness. Fluoroscopy with water soluble contrast revealing contrast material surrounding the band is a definite sign of intragastric band erosion [Figure 4]A and [Figure 4]B.[16] Other signs associated with band erosion are an open band and a change in band position.[16] CT findings include intraluminal position of the band, contrast material surrounding the band, and subphrenic abscess [Figure 4]C and [Figure 4]D.
Figure 4 (A-D): 54-year-old woman with history of gastric bypass and gastric banding. Upper GI fluoroscopic study (A, B) with water soluble contrast demonstrates that the band (arrowhead) surrounded by contrast (arrows), suggestive of intragastric erosion. Axial (C) and coronal (D) contrast enhanced CT images of another patient showing the position of the band (arrow) within the lumen of stomach suggestive of intragastric erosion

Click here to view


Although laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered a gold standard among surgical options for bariatric surgeries, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is also gaining popularity as it is technically less demanding with lower surgical risks.[17] Staple site leak is one of the most severe complications of LSG with an incidence of 0–7%.[18] Fluoroscopy with water-soluble contrast may reveal intraperitoneal leakage of contrast at gastrectomy site [Figure 5]. If there are surgical drains, it is prudent to evaluate them for contrast opacification at fluoroscopy.
Figure 5 (A and B): 34-year-old female post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy day 4 with tachycardia and pain. Upper GI fluoroscopic study (A, B) with water soluble contrast demonstrates intraperitoneal leakage of contrast (arrowheads) from the superior portion of gastrectomy and inferior to the tip of surgical drain (arrow). The leaked contrast flows freely inferiorly in the peritoneal cavity (arrowhead in B)

Click here to view


Acute gastric dilatation

Acute gastric dilatation (AGD) is a rare occurrence compared to other gastric pathologies and was first described by Duplay in 1833.[19] It is most common in postoperative patients; other causes include eating disorders such as anorexia or bulimia nervosa, psychogenic polyphagia, trauma, diabetes mellitus, or gastric dysmotility in critically ill patients.[9],[20] Delay in treatment can result in gastric necrosis, perforation, abdominal compartment syndrome, cardiorespiratory failure, and severe sepsis.

Gastric perforation following AGD occurs due to ischemic necrosis secondary to overdistension. The stomach can distend to approximately 4 liters before it perforates.[20] Stomach has a rich blood supply and is relatively resistant to perforation, however, intragastric pressure >20 cm of H2O can impair venous drainage subsequently leading to ischemia, necrosis, followed by perforation [20] It is more commonly seen in women (F:M = 2:1) and occurs along the lesser curvature in 63% of the cases.[9] Emesis is the most common symptom (90%) followed by abdominal pain and distension.[20] Upright plain films may reveal a massively distended stomach with an air fluid level. CT is very helpful in diagnosis and reveals a severely distended stomach [Figure 6]. It can also reveal features of perforation. First-line treatment for AGD includes nasogastric decompression and fluid resuscitation.[20]
Figure 6 (A-C): A 79-year-old diabetic man with sudden distention of abdomen and acute respiratory distress. Contrast enhanced multidetector CT axial (A) and coronal (B) images showing a severely distended stomach reaching inferiorly upto the level of sacrum. Volume rendered technique (VRT) depicting the 3-dimensional appearance of the hugely distended stomach (C). No free fluid or free intraperitoneal air was seen

Click here to view


Gastric obstruction

Malignancy

With the advent of advanced antiulcer therapy in the form of H2 blockers and proton pump inhibitors, malignancy is now the most common cause of gastric obstruction.[21] Adenocarcinoma is the most common malignancy of the stomach and may present with an annular, constricting pyloric mass resulting in GOO [Figure 7].[4] Arterial phase imaging with negative oral contrast increases its conspicuity on CT, which may reveal focal, irregular nodular, or mass-like thickening of the wall with heterogeneous enhancement [Figure 7]. Primary gastric lymphoma is less likely to cause GOO than adenocarcinoma, as it is considered a “soft” tumor.[4] Apart from primary gastric tumors, tumors arising from surrounding structures including the duodenum, pancreas, and biliary tree may also cause GOO.[3]
Figure 7 (A and B): A 62-year-old male with vomiting and early satiety. Axial contrast enhanced CT images (A, B) show grossly distended stomach secondary to irregular thickened pyloric wall with intense mucosal enhancement (arrow) and enhancing mass (arrowhead in B) in the pylorus, suggestive of GOO secondary to adenocarcinoma (proven on endoscopic biopsy)

Click here to view


Gastric volvulus

Gastric volvulus is defined as abnormal rotation of the stomach along its long or short axis leading to GOO. It is an emergency condition as delay in treatment can result in gastric ischemia and perforation. The predisposing factors are congenital or acquired diaphragmatic hernia, gastric neoplasm, and adhesions. Borchardt's triad consisting of sudden onset abdominal pain, intractable retching, and inability to pass a nasogastric tube is classic for gastric volvulus.[22]

Organoaxial volvulus (OAV) and mesentericoaxial volvulus (MAV) are two types of gastric volvulus depending on the axis of rotation.[23] OAV is more common that MAV, whereas some cases have features of both.[24] OAV involves rotation of stomach along its long axis with greater curvature lying superiorly and to the right in relation to the lesser curvature [Figure 8]. The fundus is displaced posteroinferiorly whereas the antrum lies in an anterosuperior position.[23] Paraesophageal hernia and Bochdalek hernia are major predisposing factors for OAV in adults and children, respectively.[25],[26] MAV has a lesser association with diaphragmatic hernia and is associated with increased risk of complications. It involves rotation of the stomach along short axis, so that the pylorus lies in a superior position than the GE junction with twisting of vascular supply of stomach [Figure 9].[23] Upper GI tract barium fluoroscopy may reveal features of GOO in a herniated stomach and abnormal axis of the stomach [Figure 8] and [Figure 9]. CT with coronal and sagittal reformation is helpful in diagnosing both types of volvulus and associated complications. Additional findings noted on CT are gastric wall thickening, perigastric fluid or fat stranding, and intraperitoneal air in cases of perforation [Figure 9].
Figure 8 (A and B): A 52-year-old man with severe heartburn, difficulty in swallowing, regurgitation. Upper GI fluoroscopic study (A) shows sliding hiatal hernia with greater curvature (white arrow) of stomach lying to the right and superiorly than the lesser curvature (white arrowhead) due to rotation along it's long axis suggestive of organo-axial volvulus. Coronal CT image (B) from another patient, shows herniated stomach into the chest with greater curvature (white arrow) lying to the right and superiorly than the lesser curvature (black arrowhead)

Click here to view
Figure 9 (A and B): A 69-year-old lady with severe midepigastric pain without vomiting. Contrast enhanced coronal (A) and axial CT (B) images: gastroesophageal junction (arrowhead) inferior to the pylorus (small black arrow) secondary to rotation of stomach along its short axis. The nasogastric tube (large black arrow) in lower esophagus and near the gastro-esophageal junction serves as a guide towards the location of GE junction. Small amount of ascites (black asterisk) with free air (white asterisk) is also noted suggestive of gastric perforation secondary to mesenterico-axial volvulus

Click here to view


Obstructed Diaphragmatic hernia

Diaphragmatic hernia can be congenital or acquired. Bochdalek and Morgagni hernia are the two main types of congenital hernia. Herniation of stomach is more common in Bochdalek hernia, whereas Morgagni hernia mainly contains part of the liver.[27] Morgagni hernia involves the herniation of intra-abdominal contents into the chest through a defect between the sternal and costal attachments of the diaphragm (space of Larrey) situated anteromedially. Bochdalek hernia occurs in the left posterolateral chest and is due to the malformation of pleuroperitoneal membranes. While obstructed Bochdalek hernia containing stomach has been reported in a few case series, only 3 cases of obstructed Morgagni hernia have been reported.[28],[29] In adults, paraesophageal hernia is a predisposing factor for gastric obstruction and strangulation.[30] Imaging features include visualization of a paracardiac mass obscuring the diaphragm on chest radiograph [Figure 10]. Air-fluid level may also be seen in the lower chest. CT with coronal reformation and upper GI barium fluoroscopy show features of gastric outlet obstruction including esophageal and gastric dilatation, herniated stomach in the chest, and site of obstruction [Figure 10].
Figure 10 (A and B): A 76-year-old lady complaining of chest pain and vomiting. Chest radiograph (A) demonstrates right para-cardiac mass (arrowhead) obscuring the right hemidiaphragm. Coronal reformatted CT (B) showed grossly distended stomach secondary to Morgagni's hernia containing pylorus (arrow) with obstruction

Click here to view


Bouveret syndrome

Gallstone ileus is a rare complication of cholelithiasis and an unusual etiology for GI obstruction. Less than 3% of eroding gallstones impact in the duodenum or pylorus resulting in gastric outlet obstruction, an entity first described by Leon Bouveret in 1896.[31] It occurs most commonly in elderly women with chronic biliary diseases.[32] The presentation is variable but most patients present with nausea, vomiting, and pain in the epigastric region. Plain radiograph may show gallstone in the region of stomach or duodenum with pneumobilia. Upper GI series may demonstrate dilated stomach with filling defect in the region of pylorus or duodenum. CT is the modality of choice demonstrating an ectopic gallstone in pylorus or duodenum causing GOO, pneumobilia, and gall bladder wall thickening [Figure 11]. Early diagnosis and treatment are of paramount importance as mortality may be as high as 30%.[33]
Figure 11 (A and B): A 68-year-old lady with severe pain and non-bilious vomiting. Axial CT image (A) showing air in intrahepatic biliary radicles (black arrowhead) and pneumoperitoneum adjacent to the pylorus (white arrowhead). Coronal CT image (B) showing gall stone impacted at the level of the pylorus. These findings are suggestive of Bouveret syndrome with eroded gall stone at the pylorus

Click here to view


Post-gastric banding obstruction

Post-gastric banding complications including stomal stenosis and band slippage leading to acute obstruction. Acute stomal stenosis is the most common complication post LAGB and can occur due to stomal edema or obstruction by food particles.[15] Patient may present with nausea, vomiting, and upper abdominal discomfort. Upper GI barium fluoroscopy reveals stomal narrowing with delayed passage of contrast [Figure 12]. Treatment involves port decompression to relieve stomal obstruction.[34] Gastric band slippage is seen in 4–13% of patients and can also lead to stomal stenosis and obstruction.[15] Recurrent vomiting and faulty surgical techniques are predisposing factors.[15] It occurs due to upward herniation of stomach through the band and can be anterior or posterior. Anterior slippage is more common than posterior slippage.[35] Patients may present with cessation of weight loss, reflux, and vomiting. Anterior band slippage with eccentric pouch formation leading to acute stomal obstruction may be associated with gastric volvulus, ischemia, or perforation.[34] Emergent band decompression is required to relieve symptoms followed by band removal or repositioning. Plain radiograph and CT with coronal reformation reveal abnormal horizontal position of band with increased angle of phi >58 degrees (angle between longitudinal axis of gastric band and spinal column, normal range: 4-58 degrees) [Figure 13]A and [Figure 13]D. Upper GI barium fluoroscopy and CT may reveal abnormal position of band with eccentric dilated pouch more than 4 cm [Figure 13]B and [Figure 13]C. Fluoroscopy may show stomal narrowing with delayed passage of contrast.
Figure 12: A 35-year-old female presenting with acute onset severe vomiting and chest pain. Upper GI fluoroscopy image shows a distended esophagus (arrow) without contrast passage beyond the level of gastric band (arrowhead). Obstruction was caused by overinflated band, which was decompressed leading to symptomatic relief

Click here to view
Figure 13 (A-D): Status post-bariatric surgery with severe heartburn and acute-onset vomiting. Frontal abdominal radiograph (A) showing the silicone gastric band (arrowhead) with increased angle of phi greater than 58 degrees (normal = 4–58 degrees). Contrast enhanced axial CT images (B and C) show eccentrically dilated gastric pouch measuring more than 4 cm (arrow). These findings are suggestive of anterior slippage of gastric band with eccentric pouch dilatation. Frontal abdominal radiograph (D) showing normal position of gastric band with angle of phi equal to 40 degrees

Click here to view


Bezoar and foreign bodies

Bezoars are concretions of nondigestible ingested matter acting as foreign bodies. They are a potential cause of GOO. Trichobezoar and phytobezoars are composed of hair and vegetable matter, respectively. Trichobezoars are most commonly found in females and patients with psychiatric disorders.[36] The risk factors for phytobezoar include gastric dysmotility including postoperative gastroparesis, pancreatic exocrine dysfunction, cystic fibrosis, and cyclosporine use.[37],[38] Bezoars can also extend into the small bowel causing obstruction. Mottled density within a distended stomach can be seen on plain radiograph and barium fluoroscopy [Figure 14]. CT depicts inhomogeneous, round, or ovoid mass containing areas of soft tissue density intermixed with gas and oral contrast material.
Figure 14 (A-C): A 17-year-old with cystic fibrosis (CF), status post-bilateral lung transplant and acute dysphagia. Abdominal radiograph (A) and upper GI fluoroscopic study (B) show a mottled density seen within the distended stomach (arrow) suggestive of phytobezoar. Upper GI endoscopy (C) was performed with saline irrigation and removal of bezoar by snare

Click here to view


Ingested foreign bodies greater that 6 cm in size can also cause GOO. This condition is more commonly seen in children, patients with psychiatric illness, prisoners, and alcoholics.[39] Prompt endoscopic removal is the treatment of choice in these cases due to the risk of perforation.[39] Plain radiograph showing the foreign body in the region of stomach may be the only imaging study required for the diagnosis. However, CT may be useful in cases of radiolucent foreign bodies and to asses for complications including perforation [Figure 15].
Figure 15 (A and B): A 19-year-old mentally challenged girl with severe epigastric pain. Contrast enhanced axial MDCT images (A and B) show a long and linear foreign body (toothbrush) (arrowhead) in body (A) and pylorus (B) of the stomach causing gastric outlet obstruction. The stomach shows mild to moderate distension due to multiple episodes of vomiting before the study was performed. Foreign body was removed endoscopically

Click here to view


Infection/inflammation

Emphysematous gastritis

Emphysematous gastritis (EG) is a life threatening condition caused by infection of the stomach with gas forming organisms. Mucosal disruption of the wall of stomach with subsequent superinfection with gas forming organisms is the basic pathophysiology. Common underlying conditions are corrosive ingestion, alcohol abuse, abdominal surgery. Diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression are predisposing factors.[40] Clinical presentation may be dramatic and include acute sepsis and shock. Plain radiograph reveals gas bubbles outlining the stomach wall in a mottled distribution [Figure 16]A. CT imaging features include gastric wall thickening and edema, intramural gas, perigastric fat stranding, gas in gastric veins, and portal venous system [Figure 16]B and [Figure 16]C.[40]
Figure 16 (A-C): A 56-year-old diabetic man with severe epigastric pain, fever, and sepsis. Abdominal radiograph (A) shows air density (arrowhead) outlining the wall of stomach. Axial CT images in soft tissue window (B) and lung window (C) settings show air within the wall of stomach (arrow). Given the present clinical setting, these findings are suggestive of emphysematous gastritis

Click here to view


Gastric emphysema is a benign condition with intramural air and may be confused with EG. However, patient is asymptomatic with absence of gastric wall edema and inflammation. In addition, intramural gas in gastric emphysema is linear and parallel to the stomach wall on plain radiograph and CT.[41] Predisposing factors include violent coughing, vomiting, and recent endoscopic procedure. Spontaneous resolution is the usual outcome.

Acute gastric necrosis

It occurs due to ischemic injury to the wall of stomach. Risk factors include acute gastric dilatation, gastric volvulus, systemic hypotension, celiac axis occlusion, disseminated thromboembolism, and vasculitis.[42],[43] Ischemic necrosis in AGD occurs due to venous insufficiency, as described previously. Imaging features are similar as seen in EG and include gastric wall thickening with intramural and portal venous gas [Figure 17]. However, there is absence of associated bacterial infection of stomach wall.
Figure 17 (A-C): A 79-year-old man with severe epigastric pain and profound hypotension. Axial CT images from superior to inferior levels (A-C) showing distended stomach with air within the wall (white arrows in A and C and black arrows in B) and portal venous air (arrowheads) is concerning for acute gastric necrosis

Click here to view


Hemorrhage

Spontaneous gastric hematoma

Anticoagulant therapy induced spontaneous intramural hematoma involving the GI tract is a rare complication with an incidence of 1/2500/year.[44] The most common site is duodenum followed by jejunum and ileum, whereas intramural hematoma involving the esophagus and stomach are rare.[44] Clinical presentation includes abdominal pain, intestinal obstruction, hematemesis, and melena. Spontaneous gastric hematoma can also result in GOO.[45] Early diagnosis with aggressive correction of coagulation is required as there is high risk of hematoma rupture with hemorrhage and hypovolemic shock.[44] Imaging features on CT include heterogeneous hyperdense or mass like thickening of stomach wall in a patient on anticoagulant therapy. Magnetic resonance imaging may be helpful in excluding underlying mass [Figure 18].
Figure 18 (A-D): A 55-year-old man with sudden onset epigastric pain. Heterogeneous mass (arrow) is seen arising from the greater curvature of stomach on CT (A). On T1W MR, mass is partly hyperintense (B) with no post-contrast enhancement (C) suggestive of spontaneous hematoma within the gastric wall. Follow-up axial CT image (D) showed resolution of hematoma

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


Gastric emergencies are being reported with increasing frequency due to advent and exponential rise of bariatric surgeries, although an untouched stomach also can develop complications. These complications are truly life threatening and prompt diagnosis is of paramount importance, with the radiologist playing a key role in it. Not all these emergencies are treated surgically, with some needing endoscopy or conservative approach. Radiologist should be familiar with these conditions in order to guide the emergency department physician.

Acknowledgement

Dr. Christine Menias for extensive help in preparation of this manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Rubesin SE, Furth EE, Levine MS. Gastritis from NSAIDS to Helicobacter pylori. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:142-59.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Pickhardt PJ, Asher DB. Wall thickening of the gastric antrum as a normal finding: Multidetector CT with cadaveric comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:973-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Guniganti P, Bradenham CH, Raptis C, Menias CO, Mellnick VM. CT of Gastric Emergencies. Radiographics 2015;35:1909-21.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Horton KM, Fishman EK. Current role of CT in imaging of the stomach. Radiographics 2003;23:75-87.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease: A review of history and treatment. Dig Surg 2010;27:161-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Moller MH, Adamsen S, Wojdemann M, Moller AM. Perforated peptic ulcer: How to improve outcome? Scand J Gastroenterol 2009;44:15-22.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Svanes C. Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: Incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis. World J Surg 2000;24:277-83.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A, Soreide K, Soreide JA. Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:1329-35.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Turan M, Sen M, Canbay E, Karadayi K, Yildiz E. Gastric necrosis and perforation caused by acute gastric dilatation: Report of a case. Surg Today 2003;33:302-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lee D, Park MH, Shin BS, Jeon GS. Multidetector CT diagnosis of non-traumatic gastroduodenal perforation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2016;60:182-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kim SH, Shin SS, Jeong YY, Heo SH, Kim JW, Kang HK. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: MDCT findings according to the perforation sites. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:63-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Furukawa A, Sakoda M, Yamasaki M, Kono N, Tanaka T, Nitta N, et al. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:524-34.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kim SW, Kim HC, Yang DM. Perforated tumours in the gastrointestinal tract: CT findings and clinical implications. Br J Radiol 2012;85:1307-13.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Vaidya R, Habermann TM, Donohue JH, Ristow KM, Maurer MJ, Macon WR, et al. Bowel perforation in intestinal lymphoma: Incidence and clinical features. Ann Oncol 2013;24:2439-43.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Blachar A, Blank A, Gavert N, Metzer U, Fluser G, Abu-Abeid S. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding surgery for morbid obesity: Imaging of normal anatomic features and postoperative gastrointestinal complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:472-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mehanna MJ, Birjawi G, Moukaddam HA, Khoury G, Hussein M, Al-Kutoubi A. Complications of adjustable gastric banding, a radiological pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:522-34.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Park JY, Kim YJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy in obese Korean patients. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:12612-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Zanotti D, Elkalaawy M, Mohammadi B, Hashemi M, Jenkinson A, Adamo M. Gastro-cutaneous fistula 4 years after a fully resolved staple line leak in sleeve gastrectomy. J Surg Case Rep 2015;2015.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Todd SR, Marshall GT, Tyroch AH. Acute gastric dilatation revisited. Am Surg 2000;6:709-10.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lunca S, Rikkers A, Stanescu A. Acute massive gastric dilatation: Severe ischemia and gastric necrosis without perforation. Rom J Gastroenterol 2005;14:279-83.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Shone DN, Nikoomanesh P, Smith-Meek MM, Bender JS. Malignancy is the most common cause of gastric outlet obstruction in the era of H2 blockers. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:1769-70.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Feldman M FL, Brandt LJ. Sleisenger and Fordtran's gastrointestinal and liver disease: Pathophysiology/diagnosis/management. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: saunders elsevier; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Peterson CM, Anderson JS, Hara AK, Carenza JW, Menias CO. Volvulus of the gastrointestinal tract: Appearances at multimodality imaging. Radiographics 2009;29:1281-93.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sonthalia N, Ray S, Khanra D, Saha A, Maitra S, Saha M, et al. Gastric volvulus through morgagni hernia: An easily overlooked emergency. J Emerg Med 2013;44:1092-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Muensterer OJ, Awad Z, et al. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 2013;27:4409-28.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Godshall D, Mossallam U, Rosenbaum R. Gastric volvulus: Case report and review of the literature. J Emerg Med 1999;17(5):837-40.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Alamo L, Gudinchet F, Meuli R. Imaging findings in fetal diaphragmatic abnormalities. Pediatr Radiol 2015;45(13):1887-900.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Gangopadhyay AN, Upadhyaya VD, Gupta DK, Sharma SP. Obstructed Morgagni's hernia. Indian J Pediatri 2007;74:1109-10.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Singh S, Wakhlu A, Pandey A, Kureel SN, Rawat JD. Delayed presentation of strangulated congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Learning from our experience. Hernia 2013;17:403-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Lukman MR, Sangar P, Sukumar N. Obstructed paraesophageal hernia in a nonagenerian treated by laparoscopic anterior gastropexy. The Medical journal of Malaysia. 2007;62 (1):83-4.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Zhao JC, Barrera E, Salabat M, Denham W, Leung D, Ujiki M. Endoscopic treatment for Bouveret syndrome. Surg Endosc 2013;27:655.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Brennan GB, Rosenberg RD, Arora S. Bouveret syndrome. Radiographics 2004;24:1171-5.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Malvaux P, Degolla R, De Saint-Hubert M, Farchakh E, Hauters P. Laparoscopic treatment of a gastric outlet obstruction caused by a gallstone (Bouveret's syndrome). Surg Endosc 2002;16:1108-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Sonavane SK, Menias CO, Kantawala KP, Shanbhogue AK, Prasad SR, Eagon JC, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: What radiologists need to know. Radiographics 2012;32:1161-78.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Weiner R, Bockhorn H, Rosenthal R, Wagner D. A prospective randomized trial of different laparoscopic gastric banding techniques for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 2001;15:63-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Gorter RR, Kneepkens CM, Mattens EC, Aronson DC, Heij HA. Management of trichobezoar: Case report and literature review. Pediatr Surg Int 2010;26:457-63.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Dellon ES, Morgan DR, Mohanty SP, Davis K, Aris RM. High incidence of gastric bezoars in cystic fibrosis patients after lung transplantation. Transplantation 2006;81:1141-6.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ripolles T, Garcia-Aguayo J, Martinez MJ, Gil P. Gastrointestinal bezoars: Sonographic and CT characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:65-9.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Velitchkov NG, Grigorov GI, Losanoff JE, Kjossev KT. Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract: Retrospective analysis of 542 cases. World J Surg. 1996;20:1001-5.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Grayson DE, Abbott RM, Levy AD, Sherman PM. Emphysematous infections of the abdomen and pelvis: A pictorial review. Radiographics 2002;22:543-61.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Kussin SZ, Henry C, Navarro C, Stenson W, Clain DJ. Gas within the wall of the stomach report of a case and review of the literature. Dig Dis Sci 1982;27:949-54.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Tang SJ, Daram SR, Wu R, Bhaijee F. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of gastric ischemia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:246-52.e1.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Herman J, Chavalitdhamrong D, Jensen DM, Cortina G, Manuyakorn A, Jutabha R. The significance of gastric and duodenal histological ischemia reported on endoscopic biopsy. Endoscopy 2011;43:365-8.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Veldt BJ, Haringsma J, Florijn KW, Kuipers EJ. Coumarin-induced intramural hematoma of the duodenum: Case report and review of the literature. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011;46:376-9.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Arain J, Al-Dabbagh A. Gastric outlet obstruction secondary to spontaneous intramural haematoma as a complication of warfarin treatment. J Surg Case Rep 2012;2012:13.  Back to cited text no. 45
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Abhijit Sunnapwar
Department of Body Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas - 78229
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.202957

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14], [Figure 15], [Figure 16], [Figure 17], [Figure 18]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Gastric Anatomy
   Role of Imaging
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1735    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded306    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal