Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 2008

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

 Table of Contents    
NEURORADIOLOGY  
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 439-444
Imaging and interventions in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A pictorial essay


1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, INHS Asvini Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Radiodiagnosis, Bharatiya Vidya Peeth, Pune, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication12-Nov-2015
 

   Abstract 


Intracranial hypertension is a syndrome of elevated intracranial pressure that can be primary or secondary. The primary form, now termed idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), was in the past a disease of exclusion and imaging played a limited role of excluding organic causes of raised intracranial pressure. However imaging markers have been described with patients with IIH at the orbit, sella and cerebral venous system. We wish to reiterate the characteristic imaging features of this poorly understood disease and also emphasise that stenting of the transverse sinus in select cases of IIH is an efficacious option.

Keywords: Cerebrospinal fluid; Cranial venous outflow obstruction; Idiopathic intracranial hypertension; Intracranial pressure; MR venography; Optic nerve sheath; Optic nerve sheath diameter; Pseudotumor cerebri; Short tau inversion recovery; Superior sagittal sinus; Transverse sinuses; Transverse sinus stenosis (TSS)

How to cite this article:
Sivasankar R, Pant R, Indrajit IK, Negi RS, Sahu S, Hashim P I, D'Souza J. Imaging and interventions in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2015;25:439-44

How to cite this URL:
Sivasankar R, Pant R, Indrajit IK, Negi RS, Sahu S, Hashim P I, D'Souza J. Imaging and interventions in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Oct 20];25:439-44. Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2015/25/4/439/169464



   Introduction Top


Intracranial hypertension is a syndrome of elevated intracranial pressure that can be primary or secondary. The primary form is characterized by normal CSF composition and no other identifiable cause. It is termed Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and has now replaced the older entities pseudotumor cerebri or benign intracranial hypertension.

In the past, IIH was a diagnosis of exclusion and imaging played a limited role of excluding lesions producing intracranial hypertension, like "obstructive hydrocephalus, tumour, chronic meningitis, arteriovenous fistula, internal jugular vein stenosis, and dural sinus thrombosis".[1] Of late, few imaging markers have been described in patients with IIH at orbit, sella and cerebral venous system. Transverse sinus stenosis is now an important treatable entity in select cases of IIH.

Terminology

To understand IIH as an entity, few terminology and issues have evolved and are summarised in [Table 1].
Table 1: Timelines in intracranial hypertension[5],[20],[21]

Click here to view


Clinical features

The typical IIH patient is an obese woman of childbearing age, with a body mass index >25. The reported incidence of IIH is 19/100,000 in this population.[2] IIH is clinically characterised by headache, symptoms of increased intracranial pressure, normal cerebrospinal fluid, without ventriculomegaly or mass lesion. Other presentations include retro-orbital pain, pulsatile tinnitus, visual disturbance (acuity and/or field loss) and blindness.

Among the visual disturbances, the most described is papilledema which may be bilateral, asymmetrical, or even unilateral; IIH can however occur in the absence of papilledema.[1] In view of the fact, that few cases of IIH develop blindness due to severe papilledema, the very nature of it being termed a benign entity is under scrutiny.

Treatment options in IIH, aim to reduce the CSF pressure. They include weight reduction, acetazolamide, surgical procedures like CSF shunt insertion, optic nerve sheath fenestration or subtemporal decompression.[3],[4] Lately, stenting of transverse sinus stenosis is emerging as a therapeutic option. There exists a wide variety of conditions and medications which mimic IIH, as well as diseases involving the venous sinuses either primarily or secondarily.[5] It is imperative to exclude them before labelling a case as idiopathic.

Criteria

Dandy Criteria has been devised for attributing raised intracranial pressure as IIH. It includes neurological symptoms and signs (often non-specific) and measurement of intracranial or lumbar CSF pressure (invasive procedure).[6] To make the criteria more objective, they have been revised and modified [Table 2]. It is important to note that CT, MRI and MRV are components in this updated version.
Table 2: Revised modified Dandy criteria for diagnosing IIH[7],[22]

Click here to view


Imaging and interventional findings

MRI brain and MR venography are the modalities of choice in diagnosing this condition using imaging.

Sequences

A study is considered complete after contrast enhanced scans of brain, orbit and evaluation with MRV. The sequences among others should include a) T2 TSE axial with fat suppression, 3 mm section thickness, b) STIR coronal, 3 mm, covering orbit and pituitary gland; and c) 3D phase-contrast MRV with velocity encoding at 15 cm/s.

Orbital findings

Fat-saturated T2-weighted images is recommended for analysis of orbits. A typical case variably reveals distension of the perioptic subarachnoid space, which causes enlarged optic nerve sheath [Figure 1], flattening of the posterior sclera [Figure 2], vertical tortuosity and elongation of orbital optic nerves [Figure 3].[5]
Figure 1: Orbital findings: Axial T2-wtd FS image (4000/100/2) of both optic nerves reveals flattening of posterior sclera and a distended perioptic subarachnoid space. A distension of optic nerve sheath >2 mm is significant. The ONSD is measured 10 mm anterior to optic foramen

Click here to view
Figure 2: Orbital findings: Sagittal T2-wtd FS image (4000/100/2) of right optic nerve shows flattened optic nerve head (ONH) with protrusion of intra-ocular portion of ONH

Click here to view
Figure 3: Orbital findings Sagittal Axial T2-wtd FS image (4000/100/2) of right optic nerve shows vertical tortuosity of ONS. The distal and proximal points of optic nerve are fixed. Elongation and kinking in its course due to raised intracranial pressure

Click here to view


An enlarged optic nerve sheath diame (ONSD), is hypothesised to occur as a result of raised intracranial pressure, since subarachnoid space underneath the optic nerve sheath is in direct anatomical connection with CSF surrounding the brain. Increased intracranial pressure causes direct transmission of pressure resulting indistention of optic nerve sheath (ONS).[7]

Sellar findings

Partial or empty sella is a well-documented imaging marker of IIH [Figure 4]. It has a sensitivity of 53 to 80% and specificity of 75 to 92%.[5] An empty sella reflects a chronic increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) and is caused by downward herniation of CSF through the diaphragm sella.
Figure 4: Sellar findings: T2W Sagittal midline image shows a partially empty sella. Mild form or partially empty sella is indicated by incomplete compression of pituitary gland. Severe form is an empty sella with non-visualised pituitary gland

Click here to view


Venous sinus morphological findings

Bilateral transverse venous sinus narrowing can be either a cause or an effect of IIH. The causative role is supported by the fact that transverse venous stenting controls IIH in patients with venous stenosis. The notion of it being an effect is reinforced by a lowering of intracranial pressure that results in normalization of venous morphology, suggesting a form of secondary cranial venous outflow obstruction (CVOO).[2],[6]

Venogenic causes of transverse sinus narrowing is seen best on sagittal and axial MR and delineated well on MR venography [Figure 5]A and [Figure 5]B. The findings range from bilateral, smooth, short segment areas of focal narrowing to well-defined signal gaps at transverse-sigmoid junctions.[6],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12]
Figure 5 (A and B): (A and B) MRV and venous phase DSA images in a case of right transverse sigmoid dural AV Fistula shows short segment pseudo-stenosis of the left transverse sinus (arrow) due to increased intracranial pressures. Arrowhead points to the occluded right sigmoid sinus

Click here to view


The word 'Idiopathic' implies there is no underlying cause on any form of imaging. A knowledge of normal variants is important, especially regarding a superior sagittal sinus that is uniformly narrowed in its anterior third and transverse sinus that is uniformly narrow.[12] Mimics of narrowing on MRV include non-thrombotic extrinsic (venous compression) or intrinsic (arachnoid granulations/fibrous septa/intraluminal partition) and thrombotic causes ([cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT)] etc).[4],[13] The tapering of transverse sinuses in IIH is attributed to its compression by raised CSF pressure.

Venous sinus pressure findings

Venous sinus pressure is measured during neurointerventional procedures, by attaching a pressure transducer to the microcatheter [Figure 6]A and [Figure 6]B. Manometry features of transverse sinus stenosis is featured by high superior sagittal sinus pressure above and a pressure gradient across the stenosis.[4]
Figure 6 (A and B): (A) Arrow points to the pressure transducer which is connected to the intravenous microcatheter (B) The other end connects to the multifunction monitor which offers equalisation with axillary pressure and reflects the pressures within the sinuses

Click here to view


Under normal conditions "a pressure gradient of only 0-3 mm Hg exists between the superior sagittal sinus and internal jugular vein.[14] In IIH, a pressure difference of at least 10 mm Hg is highly suggestive of underlying stenosis. The increased pressure difference across the transverse sinuses is hypothesised to be caused by increased resistance from external compression and an increased blood flow.[11]

Venous stenting

Stent placement at transverse sinus in IIH, was first reported in 2002.[15] Stent placement is ideally indicated for patients with fixed transverse sinus stenosis having a significant pressure gradient (>8 mm Hg) [Figure 7]A,[Figure 7]B,[Figure 7]C. It improves CSF clearance, thereby reducing intracranial (CSF) pressure and papilledema.[4] One author has recently suggested that long term outcome of venous stenting in young IIH patients is still not yet established, and therefore venous stenting should be limited to "selected patients with bilateral TSS or with a hypoplastic transverse sinus on one side and TSS on the other, and refractory symptoms and signs of increased ICP, who cannot undergo more conventional surgical treatments".[16]
Figure 7 (A-C): (A) Venous phase of ICA angiogram shows a high grade stenosis of the right lateral sinus (arrow). Stenosis are characterised for the following: Intrinsic/Extrinsic; Unilateral/Bilateral and Dominant and/or Hypoplastic Stenosis (B) 8 × 80 mm self-expanding stent deployed across the stenosed segment of the right lateral sinus (C) Post stenting angiogram shows good calibre and filling of the prior stenosed segment. [Image courtesy Professor Dr Uday S Limaye, Consultant Interventional Neuroradiology, Mumbai]

Click here to view


Stent placement procedures are performed under general anaesthesia because guide-catheter access and dural stretching during stent insertion can cause severe bradycardia.[4] Commonly, self expanding stents are used. However, in those cases of venous narrowing resulting from raised ICP, endovascular treatment is not considered a therapeutic approach, due to the fact that re-stenosis can occur.[17]

Finally, a review of literature reveals there are no evidence-based data to guide therapy yet.[18] Further there is a limited availability of metanalysis studies with regard to cerebral venous stenting for IIH.[19]

[Table 3] summarises the markers useful to in radiology practice.
Table 3: Markers of IIH in imaging and interventional radiology

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


This pictorial essay reviews briefly the terminology and criteria, while illustratively describing the imaging and interventional findings in patients with IIH. Imaging is an integral part of the modified and revised Dandy criteria to diagnose IIH, with imaging markers well established in literature now.

To summarise, MRI and MRV is recommended to analyse orbit, sellar and venographic findings in IIH. Specifically venogenic causes are sought either in symptomatic patients with headache or in asymptomatic patients with incidental findings of orbital hydrops and empty sella. Transverse sinus stenting has emerged as a successful alternative to CSF shunt surgery, particularly in patients with fixed transverse sinus stenosis with a gradient.[28]

 
   References Top

1.
Suzuki H, Takanashi J, Kobayashi K, Nagasawa K, Tashima K, Kohno Y. MR imaging of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:196-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ball AK, Clarke CE. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:433-42.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Aiken AH, Hoots JA, Saindane AM, Hudgins PA. Incidence of cerebellar tonsillar ectopia in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A mimic of the chiari I malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1901-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ahmed RM, Wilkinson M, Parker GD, Thurtell MJ, Macdonald J, McCluskey PJ, et al. Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A review of 52 patients and of model predictions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1408-14.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Degnan AJ, Levy LM. Pseudotumor cerebri: Brief review of clinical syndrome and imaging fi ndings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1986-93.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Rohr AC, Riedel C, Fruehauf MC, van Baalen A, Bartsch T, Hedderich J, et al. MR imaging fi ndings in patients with secondary intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1021-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Shofty B, Ben-Sira L, Constantini S, Freedman S, Kesler A. Optic nerve sheath diameter on MR imaging: Establishment of norms and comparison of pediatric patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension with healthy controls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:366-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Donnet A, Metellus P, Levrier O, Mekkaoui C, Fuentes S, Dufour H, et al. Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Clinical and radiologic outcome of 10 consecutive patients. Neurology 2008;70:641-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Higgins JN, Cousins C, Owler BK, Sarkies N, Pickard JD. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: 12 cases treated by venous sinus stenting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:1662-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Fera F, Bono F, Messina D, Gallo O, Lanza PL, Auteri W, et al. Comparison of diff erent MR venography techniques for detecting transverse sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol 2005;252:1021-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bateman GA. Vascular hydraulics associated with idiopathic and secondary intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002,23:1180-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Higgins JN, Gillard JH, Owler BK, Harkness K, Pickard JD. MR venography in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Unappreciated and misunderstood. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:621-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Strydom MA, Briers N, Bosman MC, Steyn S. The anatomical basis of venographic fi lling defects of the transverse sinus. Clin Anat 2010;23:153-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
King JO, Mitchell PJ, Thompson KR, Tress BM. Cerebral venography and manometry in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 1995;45:2224-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Higgins JN, Owler BK, Cousins C, Pickard JD. Venous sinus stenting for refractory benign intracranial hypertension. Lancet 2002;359:228-30.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Biousse V, Bruce BB, Newman NJ. Update on the pathophysiology and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012;83:488-94.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Vaghela V, Hingwala DR, Kapilamoorthy TR, Kesavadas C, Thomas B. Spontaneous intracranial hypo and hypertensions: An imaging review. Neurol India 2011;59:506-12.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
18.
Thurtell M J, Wall M. Idiopathicintracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri): Recognition, treatment, and ongoing management. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2013;15:1-12.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Bussière M, Falero R, Nicolle D, Proulx A, Patel V, Pelz D. Unilateral transverse sinus stenting of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:645-50.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Pearce JM. Neurological history. From pseudotumour cerebri to idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Pract Neurol 2009;9:353-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Rosenfeld E, Kesler A. Pseudotumor Cerebri (Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension) an Update. Available from: http://www.cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/31420/InTech-Pseudotumor_cerebri_idiopathic_intracranial_hypertension_an_update.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Aug 19].  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 2002;59:1492-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Passi N, Degnan AJ, Levy LM. MR imaging of papilledema and visual pathways: Effects of increased intracranial pressure and pathophysiologic mechanisms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:919-24.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Brodsky MC, Vaphiades M. Magnetic resonance imaging in pseudotumor cerebri. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1686-93.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Owler BK, Parker G, Halmagyi GM, Johnston IH, Besser M, Pickard JD, et al. Cranial venous outflow obstruction and pseudotumour cerebri syndrome. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2005;30:107-74.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
MaĴ le H, Edelman RR, Reis MA, Atkinson DJ. Flow quantification in the superior sagiĴ al sinus using magnetic resonance. Neurology 1990;40:813-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Gideon P, Sørensen PS, Thomsen C, Ståhlberg F, Gjerris F, Henriksen O. Assessment of CSF dynamics and venous flow in the superior sagiĴ al sinus by MRI in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A preliminary study. Neuroradiology 1994;36:350-4.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Jordan JE, Pelc NJ, Enzmann DR. Velocity and flow quantification in the superior sagittal sinus with ungated and cine (gated) phase-contrast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:25-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Rajeev Sivasankar
Associate Professor, Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bangalore - 560 007, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.169464

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7114    
    Printed45    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded894    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal