Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 305

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

 Table of Contents    
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY  
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 315-320
Choledochal cyst of the cystic duct: Report of imaging findings in three cases and review of literature


Department of Radiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication24-Jul-2015
 

   Abstract 

The choledochal cysts, which refer to the cystic dilatation of the biliary duct, are rare lesions generally seen in children. Choledochal cyst of the cystic duct is an uncommon entity. Often, it is associated with the choledochal cyst of the rest of the biliary tree. Isolated cystic duct choledochal cyst is quite rare. Most of these lesions have been recognized only on surgery. Modern cross-sectional imaging methods have facilitated preoperative recognition and characterization of cystic duct cyst enabling formulation of appropriate management strategy. We report the imaging findings in three cases of choledochal cyst involving the cystic duct. All these cases were correctly diagnosed preoperatively. A review of cases reported in the literature and the role of imaging in guiding the management are also presented.

Keywords: Choledochal cyst; computed tomography; cystic duct cyst; magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

How to cite this article:
Sethi S, Upreti L, Verma AK, Puri SK. Choledochal cyst of the cystic duct: Report of imaging findings in three cases and review of literature. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2015;25:315-20

How to cite this URL:
Sethi S, Upreti L, Verma AK, Puri SK. Choledochal cyst of the cystic duct: Report of imaging findings in three cases and review of literature. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jul 18];25:315-20. Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2015/25/3/315/161468

   Introduction Top


Choledochal cysts of the biliary tract are well-known entities. However, choledochal cyst of the cystic duct is exceedingly rare. These lesions were often misdiagnosed in the past and were mostly recognized at surgery. Ultrasound is a readily available investigation and the cases of suspected choledochal cyst on ultrasonography (USG) can be further evaluated on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). With the advent of modalities like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRCP, more cases are being recognized preoperatively, which provides a road map to appropriate surgical management.


   Case Reports Top


Case 1

A 26-year-old female presented with pain and jaundice. Laboratory findings included mild elevation of total and direct serum bilirubin and raised levels of alkaline phosphatase. USG done previously had revealed a mass lesion in the gall bladder, with prominent hepatic ducts and the common bile duct (CBD). A tortuous cystic lesion was seen along the course of the cystic duct. The patient was referred for further radiological evaluation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of abdomen showed an enhancing mass lesion involving the gall bladder with regional lymphadenopathy. Cystic duct was dilated and tortuous and showed wide communication with CBD [Figure 1]A. A calculus was seen in distal CBD. The patient underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove the obstruction. MRI and MRCP showed grossly dilated and tortuous cystic duct with a wide opening into a prominent common hepatic duct, in addition to gall bladder mass. The CBD was normal in caliber [Figure 1]B and C.
Figure 1 (A-C): Case 1: Cystic duct cyst in a case of carcinoma of gall bladder. (A) Coronal reformatted image from contrast-enhanced MDCT of abdomen done for evaluation of gall bladder carcinoma shows dilated and tortuous cystic duct(*). CBD distal to the opening of cystic duct is normal in caliber (arrow). Enhancing mass lesion in the gall bladder (G) is also seen. (B) Axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI at the level of body of pancreas showing the dilated cystic duct (*). Normal caliber CBD is seen medially (arrow). (C) Thick slab coronal oblique MRCP image shows a dilated and tortuous cystic duct (*) with a wide neck insertion into the prominent common hepatic duct (arrow head). The distal common bile duct is of normal caliber. The gall bladder (G) shows intraluminal hypointense lesion

Click here to view


The patient underwent laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for the gall bladder mass. Concurrent excision of the cystic duct and partial excision of the CBD was performed, due to wide opening of the cystic duct into the CBD. The continuity was established by biliary enteric anastomosis. There was no immediate postoperative complication. The patient was discharged on the 7 th postoperative day.

Case 2

A 16-year-old male presented with intermittent upper abdominal pain, dark urine, and fever for 1 year. Hyperbilirubinemia was present on biochemical evaluation. Patient had an ultrasound done which indicated the presence of dilatation of the right hepatic duct. A cystic area was reported close to the liver hilum.

Abdominal MRI and MRCP showed fusiform dilation of the cystic duct. The cystic duct opened into CBDthrough a wide opening. Fusiform dilatation of the right hepatic duct was seen. Left-sided ducts were mildly dilated [Figure 2]A-C. A diagnosis of choledochal cyst involving the cystic duct and intrahepatic ducts was made. The patient underwent open cholecystectomy with cyst excision and Roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy.
Figure 2 (A-C): Case 2: Cystic duct cyst with wide opening into the CBD associated with fusiform dilatation of the right and left hepatic ducts. (A) T2-weighted fat-suppressed (SPAIR) coronal MR images of abdomen show saccular dilatation of the right hepatic duct (bold arrow) with mild prominence of the left hepatic duct. (B) T2-weighted fat-suppressed (SPAIR) coronal MR images of abdomen show dilated cystic duct (*) with a wide neck insertion into the common hepatic duct (arrow head). Mild prominence of the left hepatic duct is seen (small arrow). Gall bladder is normal (G). (C) Coronal MR cholangiopancreatography image showing fusiform dilatation of the cystic duct (*) with a wide neck insertion (arrow head) into the normal caliber common bile duct. There is fusiform dilatation of the right hepatic duct (bold arrow). The left-sided biliary system is mildly dilated (dotted arrow). The gall bladder (G) is well distended

Click here to view


Case 3

A 25-year-old male presented with intermittent right quadrant pain, fever, and jaundice for 5 years. He had been investigated in the past for his symptoms and was carrying multiple biochemical and ultrasound reports documenting the presence of hyperbilirubinemia and cholelithiasis with bilobar fusiform biliary dilatation. He was advised surgery in the past, but had refused to undergo the same. Increasing frequency of the symptoms forced him to seek a definitive therapy.

Abdominal MRI and MRCP revealed cholelithiasis and gross fusiform dilatation of right, left, and common hepatic ducts. Calculus was seen in the dilated right hepatic duct. The cystic duct was dilated, tortuous, and opened into normal caliber CBD with a narrow neck [Figure 3]A-C. A diagnosis of type IV choledochal cyst with cystic duct involvement and cholelithiasis was made. Open cholecystectomy with complete excision of the dilated extrahepatic biliary ducts was done and continuity was established with roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy for right and left ducts separately. The hepatolithiasis were retrieved during surgery.
Figure 3: Case 3: Cystic duct cyst associated with type IV choledochal cyst. (A) T2-weighted axial MRI abdomen image shows gross fusiform dilatation of the right (R) and left (L) hepatic ducts. Calculus is seen in the dilated right hepatic duct (bold arrow) as an intraluminal signal void. (B) Another T2-weighted axial MRI abdomen image at the caudal level shows the dilated cystic duct (*). The common bile duct (dotted arrow) has a normal caliber. Multiple dilated intrahepatic biliary radicals are also seen. (C) Coronal MRCP image shows the dilated distal cystic duct with narrow opening into a normal caliber common bile duct. Gross fusiform dilatation of the right (R) and left (L) hepatic ducts is seen. The common hepatic duct (C) is also dilated. Gall bladder (G) is also visualized

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Choledochal cyst refers toisolated or combined dilatation of extrahepatic and intrahepatic biliary system of congenital origin. [1] The prevalence varies widely, ranging from 1:30,000-50,000 in the western population [2],[3],[4] to 1:1000 in Asia. [4] Females are more commonly affected. Majority of the cases present in childhood. Alonso-Lej and colleagues proposed the first classification for choledochal cyst in 1959, [5] which was expanded by Todani in 1977. [6]

Bode and Aust reported the first case of cystic dilatation of cystic duct in 1983. [7] Since then, the description of this entity has largely been in the form of isolated case reports and case series. Several terms including choledochal cyst of cystic duct, [8] cystic duct cyst, [9] type VI choledochal cyst, [10],[11] choledochocele of cystic duct, [2] and cystic malformation of cystic duct [12],[13] have been used. We carried out a search on the Medline database and Google search using the above terms and the term choledochal cyst. A total of 18 studies with 31 cases were found. [1],[2],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22] [Table 1] contains a summary of these cases, including our series.
Table 1: Summary of reported cases of cystic duct cysts


Click here to view


The most widely accepted theory for occurrence of choledochal cyst postulates that an anomalous pancreatic biliary ductal junction (APBDJ) with long common channel is the primary abnormality. [7],[16],[23] APBDJ has been reported in 33-90.2% of choledochal cysts. [23],[24] It has been suggested that abnormal APBDJ results in reflux of the pancreatic enzymes in the CBD. Due to loss of sphincteric action of the duodenum, the pancreatic enzymes cause weakening of the walls of the biliary channels ultimately leading to dilatation. This has mostly been seen with type I cyst and supported by the level of pancreatic enzymes in biliary secretions. However, this does not completely explain the pathogenesis of the cysts where the CBD is normal. Another popular hypothesis includes a ganglionosis with proximal biliary dilatation. [25] According to De et al., [18] cystic duct cyst may result from a combination of APBDJ, acute angulation, and wide orifice of cystic duct hepatic duct junction. However, APBDJ has been observed only in three cases. [11],[14],[21] Also, wide opening of the cystic duct into hepatic duct was not found in all cases. APBDJ was not seen in our cases. Hence, in our view, other factors may be responsible for cystic duct dilatation. Congenital stricture [26] and aganglionic segment with dilatation of proximal segment [4],[18] have also been reported as the possible etiologies. The evaluation of other factors which might be responsible requires further research.

The clinical presentation of patients with cystic duct cyst was generally the same as seen with other types of the choledochal cyst, and included abdominal pain, fever, and jaundice. Most of the patients also had associated complicating biliary tract disease ranging from cholangitis, cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, gall bladder polyp, cystolithiasis, etc. [1],[10],[12],[13],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],22] Gall bladder carcinoma was seen in three cases [9],[12] including one of our cases.

Association of cystic duct cysts with other congenital biliary abnormality is well documented, [8],[11],[12],[14],[16],[17],[19],[21] which makes the case for inclusion of this entity within Todani's classification. However, due to wide variation in the appearance, exact classification has been a matter of debate. Serrena et al. [1] proposed the inclusion of cystic duct cyst as type VI in Todani's classification. Loke et al. [9] suggested that these lesions may be variant of type II 2 choledochal cysts. Recently, Mishra et al. [21] have proposed a new modification, wherein cystic duct cysts are included in type II and mixed variants aregrouped as type VI.

We studied the age and sex distribution of the disease. Of the 28 cases for which information regarding age was available, 17 were adults [1],[2],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[17],[18],[19],[22] and 11 were children. [7],[12],[17],[18],[19],[24] Data regarding sex were available for 25 patients. Seventeen patients were females [1],[2],[7],[9],[11],[13],[19],[20],[21] and eight were males. [17],[19],[22] The clinical presentation of these patients was same as in those with choledochal cysts.

A plethora of imaging tools have been used for evaluation in these cases, and include USG, nuclear imaging, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), ERCP, and MRI with MRCP. The liver-specific contrast agents show biliary excretion and are used to acquire T1-weighted MR cholangiogram which has excellent spatial resolution. Hepatobiliary imino di acetic acid (HIDA) scan is used to study the biliary anatomy and diagnose obstruction of the biliary tree. In most of the early reports, the correct diagnosis was made only at surgery. [12],[18],[19] This is most likely due to lack of awareness of the entity and limitations of earlier imaging tools. With modern imaging, these cases are being correctly recognized preoperatively.

USG is generally the first modality employed for investigation of biliary symptoms. A cyst of variable size is seen in relation to portahepatis or CBD. Communication of the cyst with both gall bladder/cystic duct and CBD is seldom seen [19] owing to the cyst being larger and additional abnormalities like dilated extrahepatic biliary tree and shadowing from calculi. Moreover, ultrasound is operator dependent. In the series of Maheshwari et al., [19] definitive sonographic diagnosis was made in only one out of six cases where USG was used.

Abdominal MRI with MRCP is preferred for further evaluation of sonographic abnormalities due to lack of radiation and high contrast resolution which results in excellent depiction of biliary anatomy and relationships. Origin of cyst from the cystic duct can be easily ascertained and the associated biliary abnormalities are well seen. Normal cystic duct diameter has an upper limit of 5 mm. [27] The cystic duct dilatation may be fusiform or saccular; the fusiform variety is more common. The width of opening of cyst into the CBD is important in cases of isolated cyst due to management implications [9] and must be specifically mentioned in the report. According to Maheshwari et al., cystic duct cyst with a wide opening cannot be distinguished from type II choledochal cyst. However, we feel that with the use of MRI and MRCP, such problem seldom arises.

Management of cystic duct cyst is influenced by multiple factors. These include association of other anomalies, type of opening of the cyst into the CBD, and surgical expertise available. According to Bode et al., [7] the management should aim at prompt diagnosis, examination of the entire biliary tree, complete cyst excision, establish continuity of the biliary tree and intestines, and cholecystectomy. Some authors advocate laparoscopic resection in cases where the isolated cyst has narrow opening into the CBD. [9],[15] For cases with a wide opening, associated dilatation of other parts of biliary tree and complete resection of the dilated segment with re-establishment of biliary intestinal communication is the preferred treatment. [9],[15] In most cases, an open surgery was performed. [7],[8],[9],[11],[12],[15],[16],[18],[21] Bresciani et al. [10] performed video laparoscopic excision. Laparoscopic method was used in our first case as well.


   Conclusion Top


In conclusion, we have reported three different variants of cystic duct cyst. Ultrasound and abdominal MRI with MRCP are helpful for preoperative diagnosis and mapping other biliary abnormalities in most cases, which is crucial for appropriate surgical management.

 
   References Top

1.
Serena Serradel AF, Santamaría Linares E, Herrera Goepfert R. Cystic dilatation of the cystic duct: A new type of biliary cyst. Surgery 1991;109:320-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Baj M, Sengupta S, O′Donnell LJ. Choledochocele of the cystic duct: A case report. Internet J Gastroenterol 2002;1:1.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Geraci G, Nigro CL, Sciuto A, Arnone E, Modica G, Sciumè C. Surgical treatment of choledochal cyst associated with an aberrant posterior hepatic duct: Report of a case and brief literature review. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2011;5:73-81.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Singham J, Yoshida EM, Scudamore CH. Choledochal cysts: Part 1 of 3: Classification and pathogenesis. Can J Surg 2009;52:434-40.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Alonso-Le JF, Rever WB Jr, Pessagno DJ. Congenital choledochal cyst, with a report of 2, and an analysis of 94, cases. Int Abstr Surg 1959;108:1-30.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, Tabuchi K, Okajima K. Congenital bile duct cysts: Classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 1977; 134: 263-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bode WE, Aust JB. Isolated cystic dilatation of the cystic duct. Am J Surg 1983;145:828-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Champetier P, Partensky C, Ponchon T. Cystic malformations of the cystic duct. Surg Radiol Anat 1987:9:287-91.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Loke TK, Lam SH, Chan CS. Choledochal cyst: An unusual type of cystic dilatation of the cystic duct. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:619-20.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bresciani C, Gama-Rodrigues J, Santos VR. Video-laparoscopic treatment of a sizeable cyst of the cystic duct: A case report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998;8:376-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Weiler H, Grandel A, Frühmorgen P. Congenital cystic dilatation of the cystic duct associated with an anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction. Ultraschall Med 2003;24:197-201.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Yoon JH. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography diagnosis of choledochal cyst involving the cystic duct: Report of three cases. Br J Radiol 2011;84:e18-22.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Chan ES, Auyang ED, Hungness ES. Laparoscopic management of a cystic duct cyst. JSLS 2009;13:436-40.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Manickam S, Ramadan K, Adams BK. A rare choledochal cyst of the cystic duct with an anomalous pancreaticobiliary union in an adult patient. Clin Rad Extra 2004;59:68-71.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Conway WC, Telian SH, Wasif N, Gagandeep S. Type VI biliary cyst: Report of a case. Surg Today 2009;39:77-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ghatak S. Type IV A choledochal cyst with cystic duct cyst. HPB (Oxford) 2010;12:285.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Khanna M, Buddhavarapu SR, Heena H, Amir E. EJR 2010;75:e63-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
De U, Das S, Sarkar S. Type VI choledochal cyst revisited. Singapore Med J 2011;52:e91-3.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Maheshwari P. Cystic malformation of the cystic duct: 10 cases and review of literature. World J Radiol 2012 28;4:413-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Shah OJ, Shera A, Shah P, Rabbani I. Cystic dilatation of the cystic duct: A Type 6 biliary cyst. Indian J Surg 2013;75(Suppl 1);500-2.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Mishra PK, Ramaswamy D, Saluja SS, Patil N, Chandrashekhar S. Unusual variants of choledochal cyst: How to classify. Am Surg 2013;79:E162-4  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Kesici U, Kesici S, Tüten A. Cystic duct cyst: Report of one case. Turk J Gastroenterol 2013;24:170-2.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Komi N, Tamura T, Miyoshi Y, Kunitomo K, Udaka H, Takehara H. Nation wide survey of cases of choledochal cyst. Analysis of coexistant anomalies, complications and surgical treatment in 645 cases. Surg Gastroenterol 1984;3:69-73.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Misra SP, Dwivedi M. Pancreaticobiliary ductal union. Gut 1990;31:1144-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Singham J, Schaeffer D, Yoshida E, Scudamore C. Choledochal cyst: Analysis of disease pattern and optimal treatment in adult and paediatric patients. HPB (Oxford) 2007;9:383-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
O′Neill JA Jr. Choledochal cyst. Curr Probl Surg 1992;29:361-410.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Turner MA, Fulcher AS. The cystic duct: Normal anatomy and disease processes. Radiographics 2001;21:3-22, questionnaire 288-94.  Back to cited text no. 27
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Lalendra Upreti
C 347, Yojana Vihar, New Delhi - 110 092
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.161468

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Reports
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2277    
    Printed33    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded315    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal