Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 422

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

 Table of Contents    
COMPUTERS & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES  
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 2-10
Pressure injectors for radiologists: A review and what is new


1 Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional, Indian Naval Hospital Ship Asvini, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Radiology, Indian Naval Hospital Ship Asvini, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication28-Jan-2015
 

   Abstract 

Pressure Injectors are used routinely in diagnostic and interventional radiology. Advances in medical science and technology have made it is imperative for both diagnostic as well as interventional radiologists to have a thorough understanding of the various aspects of pressure injectors. Further, as many radiologists may not be fully conversant with injections into ports, central lines and PICCs, it is important to familiarize oneself with the same. It is also important to follow stringent operating protocols during the use of pressure injectors to prevent complications such as contrast extravastion, sepsis and air embolism. This article aims to update existing knowledge base in this respect.

Keywords: Connectors; Poiseuille′s law; power PICC; pressure injectors; tubings

How to cite this article:
Indrajit IK, Sivasankar R, D'Souza J, Pant R, Negi RS, Sahu S, PI H. Pressure injectors for radiologists: A review and what is new. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2015;25:2-10

How to cite this URL:
Indrajit IK, Sivasankar R, D'Souza J, Pant R, Negi RS, Sahu S, PI H. Pressure injectors for radiologists: A review and what is new. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Sep 17];25:2-10. Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2015/25/1/2/150105

   Introduction Top


Pressure injectors and dry imaging cameras are routinely used accessories in interventional radiology, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In radiology practice, our knowledge of pressure injectors and dry imaging cameras is largely superficial and overwhelmed by more exhaustive operational data of clinical modalities. To fulfil this academic void on the two neglected topics, dry imaging camera was dealt with earlier in this journal [1] and the spotlight now moves on to pressure injectors.

The functioning of a pressure injector involves a blend of concurrent processes in areas of diverse sciences like computers, pressure, thermal, electricity, battery operations, non-ferromagnetic metallurgy, rheology, viscosity, syringe and catheter technologies.

Pressure injectors or power injectors in imaging and interventional radiology ensure optimized opacification and delineation of normal anatomy, including arterial and venous anatomy and abnormal lesions. Today, several imaging and interventional studies require pressure injectors, as in CT (CT angiography, three-phase abdominal organ studies, cardiac CT, pre- and post-stent analysis, and perfusion CT and MRI [contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA), cardiac MRI, and perfusion MRI]. This review article provides an overview of pressure injectors and pressure injection in radiology practice in different modalities.

Basic physics of pressure injection

At its very core, the concept of using pressure injection in vascular channels is governed by Poiseuille's law. Poiseuille's law interprets that a laminar flow through a cylindrical pipe varies inversely with the viscosity of the medium and the length of the tube and directly with the pressure difference across the tube and the fourth power of the radius of the tube. [2]

A common unit for pressure used by manufacturers of medical devices is psi. It denotes pounds per square inch and is a unit of pressure or of stress. It is the pressure resulting from a force of one pound applied to an area of one square inch. Pascal is a new unit and 1 psi is approximately 6894.757 Pa. [3]

Components of a pressure injector

In their construction, pressure injectors or power injectors consist of an injector "head" where syringes with contrast material are inserted, piston plungers that deliver the contrast from the syringes, and pressure tubing that connects the syringe and vascular system of the patient. [4]

  • The piston plunger has a plunger drive ram, a drive motor that moves the drive ram, an elastic head, a stretcher rod, and a syringe [Figure 1]. Functionally, these four parts are in sequential contact starting with the drive ram. The elastic head can either expand or contract as the drive ram advances or retracts against or from the stretcher rod
    Figure 1: Line diagram of piston plunger in pressure injector system: Piston plungers are made of (1) plunger drive ram, (2) drive motor for moving the drive ram, (3) elastic head and a stretcher rod and (4) syringe. Importantly the four parts of pressure head are in sequential contact

    Click here to view
  • Pressure syringes are transparent, latex free, and provide a crystal-clear view of the contrast medium. Syringes are pre-filled or manually loaded. The injector system may be single (for contrast only) or dual syringe

    (for contrast and saline). Filling options of the syringes by J-tube or spike filling are required when manual loading is done [Figure 2]
    Figure 2 (A-C): Functional components of syringes in pressure injector system (left to right) (A) syringe filling option is by J-tube or spike filling (B) pressure syringes are latex free, transparent, either pre-filled syringes or manually loaded and (C) pressure tubing and connectors transmit selected amount, pressure, flow and rate of contrast accurately, between the injector system and the patient, particularly during concurrent scanning and table movement

    Click here to view
  • Most displays are located encasing the injector head. They have user-defined protocols to inject with variables of phase, rate, delay, and volume. Color pressure sensitive touch screen enables different colors for operations like loading, arming, and injecting
  • Pressure tubing and connectors are needed to transmit the selected amount, pressure, flow, and rate of contrast accurately, between the injector system and the patient, particularly during concurrent scanning and table movement.


Operational features of pressure injector

The salient features of pressure injectors are given in [Table 1]. Operation factors to be considered are the concentration and volume of contrast material; the phases, rate, and duration of the injection; whether or not a saline flush is used [Figure 3]; the timing delay between contrast injection and initiation of scanning; and adjustments for variations in patient's cardiac output. [5]
Figure 3 (A-E): Basic operational issues in pressure injectors (Medrad Vistron CT) include (A) working knowledge of phases, volume, rate, delay (B) an upright position during injection (C) arming after removal of air (D) a saline chaser that offers several advantages and (E) a correct handling of connectors and three way

Click here to view
Table 1: Salient features of pressure injectors


Click here to view


Pressure injectors have been developed for different modalities in radiology [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]. The important differences in their functioning at dedicated locations within radiology departments are summarized in [Table 2].
Figure 4 (A-C): Angiography / DSA Pressure Injectors (Liebel- Flarsheim). Few functional issues include (A) light, manoeuvrable and small footprint (B) protocols with variables of phase, volume, rate and delay (C) wide range of injection rates upto 45 ml/sec for aorta

Click here to view
Figure 5 (A-C) : CT Pressure Injectors: (Covidien CT OptiVantage DH) Functional issues in newer CT pressure injectors include (A) programmable user defined protocols (B) colour pressure sensitive touchscreen that offers different colours for operations like loading, arming, injecting (C) availability of vendor specific sensors such as RFID-enabled syringes/power injectors, and syringe volume sensors

Click here to view
Figure 6: MR pressure injectors (Medrad Spectris). Functional issues include (A) battery operations (12 V DC, 25 A) which charges at console, discharges at MRI suite (B) non-ferromagnetic status and (C) availability of vendor specific sensors such as keep vein open for intermittent injection

Click here to view
Table 2: Pressure injectors and modalities


Click here to view


[Table 3] depicts the different pressure injectors manufactured by vendors since the last few years. It additionally displays the chronology of mergers and acquisition of vendors and their products.
Table 3: Pressure injectors and vendors


Click here to view


Few operational issues in pressure injector

  • Multiphasic study: The advantage of the biphasic injection is that it can optimize and prolong contrast enhancement. An alternative, yet effective approach is an exponentially decelerated injection rate over time [5]
  • Timing bolus: A timing bolus injection of contrast medium followed by a saline flush is performed occasionally to determine the ideal scan delay for optimum image quality [18]
  • Saline chaser: The use of a saline flush immediately following contrast injection has several potential advantages. Typically, a double-barrel power injector is required for a saline flush. It pushes the contrast material into the vascular system of the patient that would otherwise be left behind in tubing. It assists antegrade movement of contrast bolus, which facilitates an optimal bolus shape. The amount of contrast in image acquisition is marginally increased and recent studies show that it reduces thoracic venous artifacts. [19] It clears the vascular access site of residual contrast after injection [5]
  • Warmer/heater: An inverse relationship exists between viscosity and temperature in liquids. An increase in temperature of the contrast medium results in a concomitant decrease in its viscosity. [20] Consequently, warmed contrast media are less viscous and offer lesser resistance. [18] Flow rate improvement occurs only when using high-viscosity contrast media through 4-5 F catheters. Flow rate improvement is not evident while warming lower-viscosity contrast and with larger catheters. [2] In general, extrinsic warming of iodinated contrast material to body temperature minimizes the complications for high-rate (>5 ml/s) intravenous low osmolar injections, injections of viscous iodinated contrast (e.g. iopamidol 370, Bracco Diagnostics Inc, New Jersey, USA), [21] direct arterial injections through small-caliber catheters (5 F or less), and intravenously injected arterial studies in which timing and peak enhancement are critical features [20]

    Conversely, extrinsic warming of iodinated contrast material may not be beneficial for low-rate (≤5 ml/s) intravenous low-osmolar power or hand injections, injections of low-viscosity contrast media, direct arterial injections through large-bore catheters (6 F or more), and intravenous injections in which peak opacification and timing are not critical
  • Prefilled disposable syringes: Prefilled syringes offer numerous advantages such as lesser medication errors, reduction in the risk of infection, and improved efficiency. [18] By avoiding filling and refilling, prefilled syringes reduce the risk of microbiologic contamination. [22]


Patient issues in pressure injection

  • Common intravenous routes: The preferred venous access site for pressure injection is peripheral intravenous, usually in antecubital or large forearm vein. A fundamentally important step in pressure injection is to ensure that the catheter lies within the venous system. Such an intravascular placement is indicated firstly by a low-resistance saline flushing of the line and secondly by successful aspiration of blood with backflow from the line. [6] As regards foot veins, power injection for all sizes can be performed if there is no other intravenous access. However, contrast is recommended to be injected at foot veins at 1 ml/s within 100 psi. Three-phase exams should not be performed using intravenous access in hand veins or lower extremity [23]
  • Other intravenous routes: They include peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), chest ports, central lines, and intravenous cannulas inserted into internal or external jugular vein. [28] Pressure injection of contrast media through central venous catheters for CT examinations is feasible and safe when the set hospital guidelines and injection protocols are followed. [29] Devices specifically designed for power injection are generally rated for pressures of 300 psi and flow rates of up to 10 ml/s. [6] Notwithstanding this, the vendor product sheet of all devices should be meticulously scrutinized before its use in pressure injection. An overview is displayed in [Table 4]
    Table 4: Contrast injection in peripheral intravenous routes, catheters, and lines[20,23-26]


    Click here to view
  • Pediatric cases: Issues unique to administration of intravenous contrast to neonates and children comprise use of shorter catheters, smaller volumes of contrast, slower injection rates, smaller gauge (24 G) angiocatheters, and unusual vascular access sites. A study of 554 children subjected to a power injector revealed the incidence rate of extravasation to be 0.3%. [24]


Safety issues in pressure injection

Standard operating procedures should be used in pressure injection to minimize the two big risks, namely risk of contrast extravasation and air embolism.

  • Extravasation: The reported incidence of intravenous contrast media extravasation related to power injection for CT ranges from 0.1 to 0.9%. [20] Factors associated with higher extravasation rate include high flow rates with low-diameter intravenous catheters (22 G) and location of intravenous catheter in hand. [30] Any extravasation incident is documented with a checklist containing volume and type of the contrast extravasated, gauge of intravenous access, location of intravenous catheter, the person who started the intravenous access, the person who monitored the injection, rate of injection, the radiologist and nurse who were notified of the extravasation, and the level of pain expressed by the patient (mild, moderate, or severe). [23] Treatment options include elevation of affected extremity, use of cold compresses, aspirating the extravasated contrast, or local injection of corticosteroids or hyaluronidase [20]

    Preparation of the pressure injector system is the key to minimize the risk of extravasation or air embolism. To meet this requirement stringently, every department should have a standard operating procedure at the beginning of a working day and for each case. Salient points in the standard operating protocol (SOP) include: (a) clearing the syringe and pressure tubing of air; (b) reorienting the syringe with the tubing directed downward; (c) checking the position of catheter tip for venous backflow (if backflow is not obtained, a saline test flush or special monitoring of site during injection may be needed); [20] (d) if the venipuncture site is tender or infiltrated, an alternative site is acquired; (e) enough play on the intravenous line, tubing, and pressure injector system should be permissible during concurrent table movement; and (e) good two-way communication with the patient should be established in each case

    From our personal experience of handling pressure injectors of different modalities, the right antecubital vein is preferred in CTA evaluation of aortic arch aneurysms. Thoracic aortic aneurysms at the left may cause obstruction of left brachiocephalic vein, redirecting the venous blood into the accessory hemiazygos and azygos venous system [[Figure 7]A-D]. Potential blockage at the left brachiocephalic vein is predicted by recognizing one of the two subtle signs: In this case, by the absence of backflow of blood out of venflon cannulation and the presence of a free unobstructed flow of saline
    Figure 7

    Click here to view
  • Air embolus: Clinically, large amount of air in the venous system results in various effects such as dyspnea, cough, chest pain, pulmonary edema, tachycardia, hypotension, and deficits like stroke. Patients with right-to-left intracardiac shunts or pulmonary arteriovenous malformations are at a higher risk of having a neurological deficit developing from small volumes of air embolism. [20] On CT, venous air embolism is identified as air bubbles/air-fluid levels in the intrathoracic veins, main pulmonary artery, and right ventricle, and occasionally in the intracranial venous structures. [31] Treatment includes administration of 100% oxygen and placing the patient in left lateral decubitus position [20]
  • Sepsis: Using aseptic technique during loading/emptying the left over contrast and/or saline, preferred use of pre-filled syringes, and hand hygiene can prevent sepsis. In a study, double-syringe injectors used with disposable or prefilled contrast agent syringes ensured hygienic conditions in routine clinical practice. The organisms evaluated in this study were coagulase-negative staphylococci, micrococcus, and bacillus species. [22] Changing the pressure syringe/tubing system is mandatory when it is accidentally contaminated with blood
  • Off-label pressure injector usage of gadolinium: Off-label is a term used to describe the use of contrast media for a clinical indication that is not contained in the manufacturer's labeling. [20] While hand injection of gadolinium is approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), gadolinium chelate is not yet approved for use in a pressure injector. [20] Even though such usage is not approved by the FDA, radiologists occasionally use gadolinium off-label depending on a justifiable clinical need, as in contrast enhanced Magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA), perfusion MR, and cardiac MR
  • Safety reminders from the FDA: Ruptured vascular access devices from use of power injection in CT/MRI studies is featured in over 250 adverse event reports with FDA that are spread over several years. Simply put, adverse events occur despite there being reports in the literature, letters from manufacturers, and warnings in power injector's labeling. [32] The ruptured devices resulted in fragmentation, embolization or migration, extravasation, loss of venous access requiring device replacement, and contamination with blood and contrast media. [32]


Recent advances in pressure injectors/pressure injection

  • Sensors: Different types of sensors are available across pressure injector systems of vendors [Table 5]
    Table 5: Sensors in pressure injectors[3,7,8,10,12,14,16,18,33]


    Click here to view
  • Dual flow: Dual flow is a new feature available in Medrad Stellant D, MEDRAD Inc, Warrendale, USA pressure injectors, wherein contrast and saline can be injected at the same time. The simultaneous injection in dual flow enables variable amounts of contrast and saline syringes that uniformly enhance left and right heart ventricles for ideal image quality, as well as optimally visualize right coronary arteries and right ventricle [33]
  • Syringeless pressure injectors: CT Exprès (Bracco Engineering, Lausanne, Switzerland) is a syringeless releasing device for the delivery of contrast. [34] It permits simultaneous loading of two bottles, which facilitates multiple contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans without the need for contrast reloading. Syringeless systems allow higher contrast (1000 ml) and saline loading capacity during initial setup, which allows 8-15 CECT scans
  • CT injectable PICC (PowerPICCs): It is estimated that by 2017, 95% of PICC devices sold in the United States will be power-injectable. [35] Conventional PICCs are designed to tolerate pressures of 25-40 psi and are not designed to withstand the high pressures of power injection. PowerPICC catheters are specially designed to tolerate the high pressures set to a maximum of 300 psi. PowerPICC catheters are purple colored and labeled to differentiate them from conventional PICCs. [36] These purple PICCs are available in single-, dual-, and triple-lumen configurations
  • Power source and MR pressure injectors: Traditionally, MR pressure injectors are battery operated due to the inherent DC nature of electrical supply within an MRI suite. In recent times, AC-powered MR injectors like Optistar LE, Covidien, Massachusetts, USA injector have emerged. Also, Empower MR, Wolverson, West Midlands, UK does not require batteries, since it uniquely utilizes a hydraulic mechanism [37]
  • IT-enabled pressure injectors: IT-enabled pressure injector systems with dedicated hardware and software directly pull the work list and patient data from RIS, PACS, and HIS. They can store up to 500 injection protocols of different modalities. They are advantageous as they can ensure consistency in handling same and different patients for similar indications and for regions of examination. [38] Examples of such a system are Medrad's Personalized Patient Protocol Technology, MEDRAD Inc, Warrendale, USA (P3T ® ) and Nemoto's CE Evidence, Nemoto Kyorindo co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan. [39]



   Conclusion Top


Pressure injectors or power injectors are important accessories in modern radiology departments and are used in CT, MR, and Interventional Radiology suites. Amongst the important issues related to pressure injection are patient safety and pressure injections across central venous catheters. While their functioning and operational parameters have been established to a large extent, one, however, needs to understand the ongoing technical refinements across multiple vendors. The purpose of this review article fulfils a single point availability of current facts, concerning these diverse objectives.

 
   References Top

1.
Indrajit I, Alam A, Sahni H, Bhatia M, Sahu S. Dry imaging cameras. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2011;21:82-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Rigsby CK, Gasber E, Seshadri R, Sullivan C, Wyers M, Ben-Ami T. Safety and efficacy of pressure-limited power injection of iodinated contrast medium through central lines in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:726-32.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Pounds Per Square Inch-Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pounds_per_square_inch. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 26].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Keep Vein Open Method and Injector with Keep Vein Open Function US 7491191 B2 Filing Date Feb 13, 2004 Wiki Patent. Available from: http://www.google.com/patents/US7491191. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 29].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bae KT. Technical aspects of contrast delivery in advanced CT. Available from: http://www.appliedradiologycom/Issues/2003/12/Supplements/Technical-aspects- of-c ontrast- delivery-in-advanced-CT.aspx. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 31].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Plumb AA, Murphy G. The use of central venous catheters for intravenous contrast injection for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 2011;84:197-203.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Cardiac Interventions Today 2013 Buyer′s Guide. Available from: http://www.bmctoday.net/citoday/buyersguide/2013/chart.asp?id=contrast_delivery_systems. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 16].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Medrad Products. Available from: http://www.medrad.com/en-us/info/products/Pages/Products-landing.aspx. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 17].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Medrad History. Available from: http://www.medrad.com/en-us/aboutmedrad/Pages/History.aspx. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 22].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bracco Contrast Injectors. Available from: http://imaging.bracco.com/us-en/products-and-solutions/contrast-injectors. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 10].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bracco (company). Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bracco_(company). [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 16].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Optivantage™ Dual-Head Injector Dual-Head CT Contrast Delivery System. Available from: http://pharmaceuticals.covidien.com/webforms/threecolumn.aspx?id=670. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 20].  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Schiller India ties up with Covidien for Injectors. Available from: http://modernmedicare.co.in/articles/schiller-india -ties-up- with-covidien-for-injectors/. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 21].  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mallinckrodt. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 21].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
CT contrast medium injector Accutron CT. Available from: http://www.medtron.de/en/ct/accutron-ct.html. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 22].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Nemoto Contrast Injectors. Available from: http://www.nemoto-do.co.jp/nemoto_en/pr_ce/index.html">http://www.nemoto-do.co.jp/nemoto_en/pr_ce/index.html. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 22].  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Uhlrich Contrast Media Injectors. Available from: http://www.ulrichmedical.com/en/ctmri-contrast-agent-injectors.html-0. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 24].  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Covidien Power Injectors for Diagnostic Imaging Contrast under Control. Available from: http://www.healthcare21.ie/media/blfa_files/Injectors.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 22].  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
The CT Saline Advantage. Available from: http://www.medrad.com/fr-fr/info/products/Pages/TheCTSalineAdvantage.aspx. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 26].  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 9 2013. Available from: http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/Contrast%20Manual/2013_Contrast_Media.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 11].  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Brunette J, Mongrain R, Rodés-Cabau J, Larose E, Leask R, Bertrand OF. Comparative rheology of low- and iso-osmolarity contrast agents at different temperatures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71:78-83.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Buerke B, Puesken M, Mellmann A, Schuelke C, Knauer A, Heindel W, et al. Automatic MDCT injectors: Hygiene and effciency of disposable, prefilled, and multidosing roller pump systems in clinical routine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W226-32.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
UAB Department of Radiology Guideline on IV Injection Techniques and Quality Monitoring for CT-University and UAB Highlands Hospitals. Available from: http://www.uasom.uab.edu/PublicDocuments/Radiology/PandP/CT_IV_Access_Guidelines.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 29].  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Amaral JG, Traubici J, BenDavid G, Reintamm G, Daneman A. Safety of power injector use in children as measured by incidence of extravasation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:580-3.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
UMHS Department of Radiology, CT Section IV Injection Guidelines for CT Contrast. Available from: http://www.med.umich.edu/rad/IVguidelines.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 29].  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
CT Technologist: Policy for Power Injection. Available from: http://medicine.yale.edu/. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 23].  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Implantable Vascular Access Power Ports: A Closer Look. Oncology Nursing Society (ONS). Available from: http://onsopcontent.ons.org/Publications/SigNewsletters/acc/acc18.2.html. [Last accessed on 2014 Feb 4].  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
UCSF Vascular Access and Use of Central Lines and Ports in Adults Intravenous Administration of Contrast Agents for Enhanced CT or MR Scans in Adults. Available from: http://www.radiology.ucsf.edu/patient-care/patient-safety/contrast/iodinated/vascular-access-adults. [Last accessed on 2014 Feb 03].  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Herts BR, O′Malley CM, Wirth SL, Lieber ML, Pohlman B. Power injection of contrast media using central venous catheters: Feasibility, safety, and efficacy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:447-53.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Wienbeck S, Fischbach R, Kloska SP, Seidensticker P, Osada N, Heindel W, et al. Prospective study of access site complications of automated contrast injection with peripheral venous access in MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:825-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Price DB, Nardi P, Teitcher J. Venous air embolization as a complication of pressure injection of contrast media: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:294-5.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Reminders from FDA Regarding Ruptured Vascular Access Devices from Power Injection. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/Tipsand Articleson Device Safety/ucm070193.htm. [Last accessed on 2014 Jul 05].  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
DIAS 2007 Catalogue-GE Healthcare. Available from: http://www.gehealthcare.com/accessories/2007%20AandS%20Catalog.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 27].  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
CT Exprès TM Contrast Injection System. Bracco Injeneering. Available from: http://braccoimaging.com/sites/braccoimaging.com/files/technica_sheet_pdf/CT%20EXPRES-DEPLIANT% 20 2013_EN_final%20version_15.pdf. [Last accessed on 2014 Mar 11].  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology. Trends in PICC Line Technology. Available from: http://www.dicardiology.com/article/trends-picc-line-technology. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 22].  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Bard Power PICCFNx01 catheter? Frequently Asked Questions. Available from: http://www.powerpicc.com/faq.php. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 23].  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
MRI Hydraulic Injector Empower MR®. Available from: http://www.allmri.com/product_info.php?language=enandinfo=p201_mri-hydraulic-injector-empower-mr-.htmland. [Last accessed on 2014 Jan 29].  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Bolan C. IT Empowers Contrast Media Injectors. Available from: http://www.appliedradiology.com/Issues/2011/07/Tech-Trends/IT-empowers-contrast-media-injectors.aspx. [Last accessed on 2014 Feb 2].  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
CE Evidence. Available from: http://www.nemoto-do.co.jp/nemoto_en/pr_ce/. [Last accessed on 2014 Feb 01]. 39.  Back to cited text no. 39
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Inna K Indrajit
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Indian Naval Hospital Ship Asvini, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 005, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.150105

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed17959    
    Printed286    
    Emailed8    
    PDF Downloaded1241    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal