Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 217

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY Table of Contents   
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 347-350
Retrograde fluoroscopy-guided trans-urethral exchange of ureteral stents: Comparison of direct grasping vs. modified snare


Department of Radiology, University "Campus Bio Medico di Roma", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200 00128, Rome

Correspondence Address:
Roberto Luigi Cazzato
Department of Radiology, University "Campus Bio Medico di Roma", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128
Rome
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.125615

Rights and Permissions

Background: Several different techniques including guide-wire lasso, simple snare, modified snare (MS) and direct grasping (DG), are available for retrograde ureteral stent retrieval and exchange. Choice among them is not always easy and depends on many different factors, including the local level of expertise. Objective: To compare the MS and DG during retrograde exchange of double-J ureteral stent under fluoroscopic guidance. Settings and Design: 66 patients (36 men and 30 women; mean age 66.6 years) needing retrograde ureteral stent exchange were included. All stents were previously placed through an anterograde way. Materials and Methods: Time needed to grasp each single stent was recorded as well as the complications. Statistical Analysis: Fisher's test was used to compare procedural time in both groups; P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 102 stents were exchanged. Mean time was 4.46 min for DG and 7.81 min for MS (P = 0.029). No significant complications were encountered. Conclusions: Compared to the MS, the DG is easier, quicker, and less expensive.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
  Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
  Reader Comments
  Email Alert *
  Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3352    
    Printed53    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded107    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal