Indian Journal of Radiology Indian Journal of Radiology  

   Login   | Users online: 2016

Home Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size     

 

 Table of Contents    
INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY  
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 251-253
Fusion of intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm CT and pretreatment imaging for ablation margin assessment of liver tumors: A preliminary study


1 Department of Radiology, Nissay Hospital, Itachibori, Nishiku, Osaka, Japan
2 Department of Radiology, Komatsu Hospital, Kawakatsucho, Neyagawa, Japan

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication7-May-2013
 

   Abstract 

The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the feasibility of assessing ablation margins after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumors from fusion images of post-treatment C-arm computed tomography (CT) images fused to pretreatment images. Five patients with liver tumors underwent RFA. Intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm CT images were obtained for all patients immediately after RFA, and multi-detector CT (MDCT) images were obtained 3-7 days later. The C-arm CT and MDCT images were fused to pretreatment images using a multimodality image fusion software. The minimum ablation margins were assessed in the C-arm CT and MDCT fusion images. Ablation margins after RFA of liver tumors can be measured using intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm CT images fused with pretreatment images. This technique has the potential for use in the intra-procedural assessment of liver tumor ablation.

Keywords: Cone-beam CT; multimodality fusion; radiofrequency ablation; safety margin

How to cite this article:
Iwazawa J, Hashimoto N, Mitani T, Ohue S. Fusion of intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm CT and pretreatment imaging for ablation margin assessment of liver tumors: A preliminary study. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012;22:251-3

How to cite this URL:
Iwazawa J, Hashimoto N, Mitani T, Ohue S. Fusion of intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm CT and pretreatment imaging for ablation margin assessment of liver tumors: A preliminary study. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Nov 18];22:251-3. Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2012/22/4/251/111470

   Introduction Top


Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an established local therapy for managing localized liver tumors. Ablation margins are usually evaluated using contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) after RFA therapy. [1] However, immediate therapeutic assessment using these techniques is limited unless the equipment is available during RFA. Recent advances in C-arm cone-beam technology allow operators to acquire optimal images during procedures without requiring patient transfer. [2],[3] A digital flat-panel detector on the upper side of the C-arm rotates around the patient to generate volumetric images similar to conventional CT images. In this preliminary study, we used this novel modality and injected a contrast medium through a peripheral vein into patients undergoing RFA of liver tumors to assess ablation margins using a recently developed multimodality fusion software.


   C-arm Computed Tomography Top


Five patients (4 men, 1 woman; mean age, 68.2 years), each of whom had a solitary liver tumor (4 hepatocellular carcinomas, 1 metastatic tumor; range, 8-30 mm; mean size, 15.0 mm), underwent RFA using a C-arm cone-beam system (Innova 3100; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). Prior to RFA treatment, we obtained images of each patient's treatment area using either triphasic dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Contrast-enhanced C-arm CT images were obtained immediately after RFA. A 90-ml bolus of iopamidol (300 mgI/ml; flow rate, 1 ml/s) was injected through the antecubital vein using a power injector and the C-arm CT images were obtained 2 min later. [4] The image acquisition parameters included were the following: Total scanning angle, 200 degrees; acquisition time, 10 s; matrix size, 1500 × 1500; isotropic voxel size, 0.2 mm; and effective field-of-view, 18 cm 2 . Raw data sets were transferred to an external workstation (Advantage Workstation 5.0; GE Healthcare), upon which the images were reconstructed with a 1-mm slice thickness in multiple planes. Images were reconstructed within approximately 1 min of scan completion.


   Multi-detector Computed Tomography Top


Post-treatment MDCT images were obtained for each patient 3-7 days after RFA therapy. Triphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT images were obtained using a 16-MDCT scanner (Somatom Sensation; Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) using the following scanning parameters: 120 kV; 182 mA; beam collimation, 0.75 mm; helical pitch, 1.15 mm; and rotation table speed, 0.5 s. Helical acquisition for arterial, portal, and venous phase imaging was initiated at 20, 60, and 160 s, respectively, after a threshold level of 100 HU was reached in the abdominal aorta. Images were reconstructed with a 1-mm slice thickness in multiple planes.


   Image Fusion Top


We used a multimodality image fusion software (Integrated Registration; GE Healthcare) to fuse multimodality images before and after RFA. The volume data sets of contrast-enhanced C-arm CT, portal-phase MDCT, and hepatobiliary-phase MR images were transferred to an Advantage Workstation 5.0 (GE Healthcare). Images were first displayed side by side on the workstation screen and then manually adjusted so that the intrahepatic vessels adjacent to the target tumor were similarly displayed. A hepatic or portal vein that was identical in both images was then selected as the landmark for image registration in another plane. If image registration was unsatisfactory, one or two additional intrahepatic vein landmarks were selected to ensure more precise image registration adjustment. Once the images were registered, the fusion images were reconstructed as 3-mm-thick multi-planar images by the same radiology technician.


   Results Top


The fused post-treatment C-arm CT and pretreatment images were sufficiently delineated to permit measurement of the ablation margins [Figure 1]. However, the interface of the ablated margin was not sharp and inflammatory peripheral enhancement was more eminent for C-arm CT fusion than MDCT fusion in all cases. The minimum ablation margins measured using C-arm CT and MDCT fused with the pretreatment images are listed in [Table 1].
Figure 1 (A-C): A 66-year-old man with a 15-mm hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) An inverted hepatobiliary-phase MR image obtained before RFA showing the target tumor (arrow) at hepatic segment VII. (B) A transverse fusion image of intra-procedural contrast-enhanced C-arm CT and pretreatment hepatobiliary-phase MR image revealing insufficient ablation margins (arrow) due to the heat-sink effect of the adjacent portal vein (arrowhead). ( C) A fusion image of a portal-phase multi-detector CT image and a pretreatment hepatobiliary-phase MR image showing an insufficient ablation margin (arrow) and an adjacent portal vein (arrowhead) that are similar to those seen in the C-arm CT fusion image.

Click here to view
Table 1: Minimum ablation margins of liver tumors after radiofrequency ablation as determined from fusion of pretreatment images and post - treatment C - arm CT and MDCT images

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Complete ablation of tumors with margins ≥5 mm is recommended for curative ablation. [5] Ablation margins are usually evaluated using side-by-side comparisons of transverse pre- and post-treatment image views. This approach is limited by manual assessment errors only. To overcome this shortcoming, we adopted a new image fusion software that can fuse multimodal image sets. Using this technique, fusion images enable quantitative evaluation of ablation margins. Our results suggest that intra-procedural ablation margin assessment can be performed using a fusion image from C-arm CT images obtained during RFA and pretreatment CT/MR imaging. In this study, image fusion took approximately 1-2 min, allowing immediate decisions regarding further treatment. If insufficient ablation margins or residual lesions are detected on fusion C-arm CT images, additional targeted ablation can be promptly applied under C-arm CT guidance. Conversely, when sufficient ablative margins are confirmed on C-arm CT images, additional therapeutic assessments with other imaging modalities may not be required.


   Conclusion Top


Intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm CT images fused with pretreatment images for the assessment of treatment efficiency demonstrated sufficiently delineated ablation margins after RFA of liver tumors. This novel technique may potentially be used in the intra-procedural assessment of liver tumor ablation.

 
   References Top

1.Kim KW, Lee JM, Klotz E, Kim SJ, Kim SH, Kim JY, et al. Safety margin assessment after radiofrequency ablation of the liver using registration of preprocedure and postprocedure CT images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W565-72.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Wallace MJ, Kuo MD, Glaiberman C, Binkert CA, Orth RC, Soulez G. Three-dimensional C-arm cone-beam CT: Applications in the interventional suite. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19:799-813.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD. C-arm cone-beam CT: General principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19:814-20.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Iwazawa J, Ohue S, Hashimoto N, Mitani T. Ablation margin assessment of liver tumors with intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm computed tomography. World J Radiol 2012;4:109-14.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Mori K, Fukuda K, Asaoka H, Ueda T, Kunimatsu A, Okamoto Y, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of the liver: Determination of ablative margin at MR imaging with impaired clearance of ferucarbotran-feasibility study. Radiology 2009;251:557-65.  Back to cited text no. 5
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Jin Iwazawa
Department of Radiology, Nissay Hospital, 6-3-8 Itachibori, Nishiku, Osaka 550-0012
Japan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.111470

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Clinical Experience with Cone-Beam CT Navigation for Tumor Ablation
Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh,Aradhana M. Venkatesan,William Van der Sterren,Alessandro Radaelli,Bart Carelsen,Bradford J. Wood
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2015; 26(2): 214
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Ultrafast cone-beam computed tomography imaging and postprocessing data during image-guided therapeutic practice
Jijo Paul,Emmanuel C. Mbalisike,Thomas J. Vogl
European Radiology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    C-arm Computed T...
    Multi-detector C...
   Image Fusion
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2281    
    Printed80    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded155    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal