GYNAECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
|Year : 2005 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 361-372
|Prenatal diagnosis of anterior abdominal wall defects: Pictorial essay
From the Meera Hospital, Shiv Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
Keywords: Anterior abdominal wall, omphalocele, gastroschisis, body stalk anomaly, prune-belly syndrome, ultrasound, chromosome
|How to cite this article:|
Agarwal R. Prenatal diagnosis of anterior abdominal wall defects: Pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2005;15:361-72
Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects include omphalocele, gastroschisis, body stalk anomaly and prune-belly syndrome. Omphalocele is a midline anterior abdominal wall defect with herniation of the abdominal viscera into the base of the umbilical cord.. Gastroschisis is a defect lateral to midline with evisceration of abdominal contents directly into the amniotic cavity. Body stalk anomaly is an extensive abnormality of the anterior wall with adhesion of eviscerated viscera to the placenta. Prune-belly syndrome is an anomaly in which intestinal pattern is evident through the thin, lax, protruding abdominal wall in the infants.
|How to cite this URL:|
Agarwal R. Prenatal diagnosis of anterior abdominal wall defects: Pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging [serial online] 2005 [cited 2019 May 24];15:361-72. Available from: http://www.ijri.org/text.asp?2005/15/3/361/29157
Omphalocele and gastroschisis are most frequently encountered congenital ventral wall defects. Majority cases of omphalocele are associated with other serious structural defects and chromosomal abnormalities. Whereas, gastroschisis is usually an isolated lesion and is not associated with other structural defects and abnormal karyotype. Body stalk anomaly is also an isolated anomaly with rare association with chromosomal anomalies, but is lethal. Prune-belly syndrome is mostly associated with obstructive uropathy and severe maldevelopment of urinary tract. The final outcome of these defects is significantly affected by the presence of additional structural and / or chromosomal abnormalities. So, accurate detection and appropriate classification of associated fetal anomaly is of great importance for the further course of pregnancy ,. For this reason, finding of anterior abdominal wall defect requires further assessment of the affected pregnancy by targeted ultrasonography, echocardiography and karyotyping. In cases associated with lethal or multiple severe anomalies, parents may opt for elective termination of the pregnancy. However, in absence of associated life threatening anomalies, infants can have an uncomplicated course with a normal long-term quality of life  but decision to continue the pregnancy should be made by a multidisciplinary team including experienced sonologist, perinatologist, geneticist and cardiologists. Fetuses with an isolated ventral wall defect should be delivered in a unit with easy access to pediatric surgical facilities. As far as the mode of delivery is concerned, these fetuses may safely be delivered vaginally, and cesarean delivery should be performed for obstetric indication only .
Antenatal sonography is the key imaging modality available at present time. The widespread use of the fetal ultrasonography in routine antenatal care now allows majority of ventral wall defects to be identified before the age of viability. Anterior abdominal wall defects cause elevation in the MSAFP. Therefore, examination of the ventral wall is a prerequisite part of the sonographic evaluation in all pregnancies complicated by raised MSAFP. Although the etiologies of anterior abdominal wall defects are likely to be widely discrepant, the pathophysiology of each defect leads to key characteristics that make it possible to differentiate one entity from another. Among these features are the location of the defect in relation to cord insertion [Figure - 1], the size and contents of the defect, and associated anomalies. These basic features of simple abdominal wall defects such as omphalocele and gastroschisis are used as the initial points of assessment . Using these basic features, diagnosis of omphalocele and gastroschisis can be made as early as 10 weeks and 12 weeks of gestation respectively. But before the early diagnosis of these defects is considered one must be familiar with the physiologic midgut herniation [Figure - 2], which subsides at 12 weeks of gestation.
Accurate prenatal diagnosis of ventral wall defects, using ultrasonography, is important because it affects patient management and prognosis. However, detection rate of omphalocele and gastroschisis
was found to be 66.7 % during the second and third trimester . In another study ultrasound examination between 16 and 22 weeks gestation detected 60% of defects with a false positive rate of 5.3 % and fetuses with gastroschisis were incorrectly assigned as exomphalos in 14.7 % . Failure in correctly diagnosing abdominal wall defects occurred mostly in cases with small defects, ruptured omphalocele, multiple fetal anomalies, intrauterine fetal death, twin pregnancies or cases referred in late gestation. A significant regional variation in the ultrasonographic detection of fetal abdominal wall defects was also found in Europe . The variation reflects differences in screening policies, equipment and operator experience. Misdiagnosis of exomphalos as gastroschisis has serious implications because exomphalos is often associated with chromosomal anomalies and karyotyping may not be performed because gastroschisis is rarely associated with chromosomal anomalies. On the other hand, gastroschisis may be misdiagnosed as an omphalocele, which may result in unnecessary amniocentesis exposing the patient to the risks involved in the procedure. Therefore, some of the problems of diagnostic accuracy need to be considered when counseling couples with a ventral wall defect.
Although the specific factors leading to omphalocele and gastroschisis have not been elucidated, the focus has rested on environmental and nutritional factors. Maternal illness, infections, frequent medication during pregnancy, smoking, and genetic abnormalities may be associated with birth of babies with anterior abdominal wall defects. Folic acid deficiency, hypoxia and salicylates have caused laboratory rats to develop abdominal wall defects. One recent study has shown that periconceptional multivitamin use is associated with a 60% reduction in the risk of nonsyndromic omphalocele . However, another investigation found no association between maternal folic acid use and abdominal wall defects . Abnormal levels of carotene, glutathione, and high nitrosoamnies may be related with ventral wall defects . Gastroschisis is seen more frequently in mothers who use vasoactive substances such as nicotine and cocaine . There are several reports describing a higher rate of smoking in women whose fetuses are found to have gastroschisis . However, according to one study maternal smoking has not been associated with omphalocele . Studies from the California birth defects monitoring program have proposed that a low prepregnancy body mass may represent a risk factor for offspring with gastroschisis . One study reported an increased rate of abdominal wall defects among infants born to women who were obese but not diabetic . Another study reported an increased risk of these defects with socioeconomic deprivation . Prevalence of exomphalos increase with maternal age and decrease with gestational age  whereas, gastroschisis tend to occur in younger mothers which may hypothetically be related to lifestyle factors ,,. However, other investigations reported no clear association between omphalocele risk and maternal age .
| Omphalocele|| |
Normal development of the anterior abdominal wall depends on the fusion of four ectomesodermic folds; cephalic, caudal and two lateral folds. Failure of lateral body folds to migrate centrally results in omphalocele. If the anomaly of the ventral wall is more extensive and, in addition to exomphalos involves cephalic embryonic fold then it results in pentalogy of Cantrell. Similarly, if the lateral fold defect is associated with caudal fold failure, it results in exstrophy of bladder or cloaca.
Exomphalos is a sporadic abnormality with a birth prevalence of about 1 in 4000. Prenatal diagnosis of an omphalocele by ultrasound is based on the demonstration of the midline abdominal wall defect, the herniated sac with its visceral contents and the umbilical insertion at the apex of the sac [Figure - 3][Figure - 4][Figure - 5]a,b,c,[Figure - 6]a,b. The sac is composed of peritoneum, amnion and Whartons jelly. Visualization of the sac confirms the diagnosis of omphalocele and virtually excludes gastroschisis. However, the amnio-peritoneal sac is not always visible [Figure - 3][Figure - 4]. Rarely, the sac may rupture in utero and omphalocele masquerades as gastroschisis . Visceral contents in the sac may include loops of intestine, liver, [Figure - 5]a,b,c, [Figure - 6]a,b, [Figure - 7] and stomach. Ascites is common in the herniated sac [Figure - 5]a,b,c,[Figure - 6]a,b,[Figure - 7]. Size of abdominal opening in an omphalocele may range from a simple hernia of the cord containing a few loops of bowel to giant omphaloceles in which large part of liver protrudes. The size of omphalocele does not alter the prognosis but surgical reduction and repair correlates with size of the abdominal wall defect. Sometimes, complete exteriorization of the liver is seen [Figure - 8]a,b; in such cases abdominal and thoracic cavity may be small and under developed. Associated pulmonary hypoplasia, restrictive lung disease and oligohydramnios complicate the out come. For pregnancies in which isolated omphalocele is detected at early ultrasound, follow-up scan is advised especially at 20-24 weeks gestation for the detection of late-manifesting fetal anomalies. Follow-up ultrasound also helps in detection of complete disappearance of a small defect, which may occur later in the pregnancy . Additional follow-up ultrasound examinations are also required until delivery.
A higher proportion of omphaloceles is associated with concurrent malformations [Figure - 9], syndromes and chromosomal anomalies . Cardiac anomalies ,,,,, gastrointestinal, genitourinary , neural tube ,, and musculoskeletal defects are frequently found in association with exomphalos. Omphalocele is involved in many polymalformative syndromes such as Beckwith-Widemann , pentalogy of Cantrell , Meckel-Gruber syndrome , and lethal cleft palate-omphalocele syndrome . The most common syndrome associated with omphalocele is Beckwith-Widemann syndrome, which is characterized by omphalocele, organomegaly, gigantism, hemihypertrophy, and polyhydramnios . Associated chromosomal anomalies include trisomies 18, 13, and 21, Turner, Klinefelter, and triploidy syndromes ,. Karyotypic abnormalities are more common in association with omphaloceles that contains only bowel compared with those that contains only liver or bowel and liver both ,. Nonsyndromal omphalocele may be familial . Prevalence of chromosomal defects increase with maternal age and decrease with gestational age . Associated polyhydramnios or oligohydramnios also suggests increased risk of chromosomal anomalies.
Isolated omphalocele diagnosed during the early stages of gestation typically has a good prognosis . Perinatal mortality rate is low in such case .
Differential diagnosis of an omphalocele include; physiologic bowel herniation, umbilical hernia, gastroschisis, amniotic band syndrome, exstrophy of urinary bladder and cloaca, pentalogy of Cantrell, body stalk anomaly, cavernous hemangiomas, pseudo-omphalocele, blood clots and acardiac monster.
At 8-10 weeks of gestation, all fetuses demonstrate physiologic umbilical herniation of the midgut [Figure - 2] that is visualized as a hyperechogenic mass in the base of umbilical cord; retraction into the abdominal cavity occurs at 10-12 weeks and is completed by 11weeks and 5 days ,,. A physiologic midgut herniation seldom exceeds 7 mm in diameter and is invariably smaller compared with diameter of the abdomen. Because of physiologic herniation of bowel, diagnosis of an omphalocele may be difficult before 12 weeks gestation. However, there are some reports in the literature describing detection of omphalocele as early as 10 weeks of gestation ,. Van Zalen- Sprock et al also reported 14 cases of exomphalos diagnosed at 11-14 weeks of gestation . Early detection is especially possible when liver is identified as an eviscerated organ. Extracorporeal liver has typical echogenic property within the herniated sac and it never 'migrates' physiologically outside the permanent place below the diaphragm.
Amniotic band syndrome is a common cause of abdominal wall disruption defects. An atypical location of the abdominal wall defect along with extremity deformity with adherent band suggests amniotic band syndrome ,. Multiple cavernous hemangiomas are often found over the lower body and present as multiple surface masses that causes limb hypertrophy. Compression of the lateral thoracic wall due to transducer pressure or oligohydramnios may change the shape of the fetal abdomen, which may be confused with an exomphalos. Prenatal diagnosis of 'hernia' of the fetal abdominal wall has been reported. Sonography showed a large extra-abdominal mass on the right of the normal umbilical cord insertion and was not definable either as an omphalocele or as gastroschisis [47,48]. Blood clots around the umbilicus [Figure - 10] a,b secondary to placental abruption may mimic an omphalocele or gastroschisis. Rarely, acardiac monster [Figure - 11]a,b, lying near the anterior abdominal wall of the normal twin fetus, because of its extremely bizarre appearance, may appear as an omphalocele or gastroschisis.
| Pentalogy of Cantrell|| |
This syndrome was first described by Cantrell and his colleagues in 1958 . Anomalies observed in this disorder are  a midline, supraumbilical abdominal wall defect  a defect of the lower sternum  a deficiency of the anterior diaphragm  a defect in the diaphragmatic pericardium  congenital intracardiac defects ,. The most common intracardiac defects are atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and teratology of Fallot . Diagnosis of the complete syndrome requires the above five criteria described by Cantrell but incomplete variant forms exhibiting three or four of the features have been described . In sonography, ectopia cordis associated with an omphalocele should suggest the diagnosis of pentalogy of Cantrell [Figure - 12]a,b. Earliest prenatal diagnosis of the syndrome has been reported at 9 weeks and 5 days. The syndrome may be associated with other anomalies such as agenesis of the gallbladder, and polysplenia , cystic hygroma, renal dysplasia , exencephaly and amniotic band syndrome . Differential diagnosis includes isolated ectopia cordis, ectopia cordis associated with amniotic band syndrome, omphalocele and body stalk anomaly. In isolated defects, primary repair in the neonatal period is the best type of management for this rare condition . However, the out come depends on the severity of congenital cardiac anomaly .
| Bladder and cloacal exstrophy.|| |
Both bladder exstrophy and cloacal exstrophy are sporadic abnormalities. Bladder exstrophy is found in 1 per 30000 births and cloacal exstrophy is found in about 1 in per 200000 births. The severity ranges from a small vesicocutaneous fistula in the abdominal wall or simple epispadias to complete exstrophy of the cloaca involving exposure of the entire hindgut and the bladder. Sonographically, bladder extrophy may appear as a well-defined, solid or complex anterior abdominal mass below the umbilical cord insertion, immediately superior to the fetal genitalia. Prolonged and repeated scans fail to reveal the fetal urinary bladder in presence of normal renal collecting system and ureters and amniotic fluid ,. In addition, a small penis with anteriorly displaced scrotum and abnormal widening of the iliac crests may be found . Umbilical cord insertion may be abnormal. The protruding anterior abdominal mass does not contain any large cystic area as it does not contain the urine that is excreted directly from the ureters into the amniotic fluid. Since there is no obstruction to urinary flow, upper urinary tract and amniotic fluid index is found normal . In cloacal exstrophy, both urinary and gastrointestinal tracts are involved. Cloacal exstrophy (also referred to as OEIS complex) is the association of an omphalocele, exstrophy of the bladder, imperforate anus, and spinal defects such as meningomyelocele ,. Associated anomalies are common including cardiovascular, central nervous system, vertebral, small bowel atresia, single umbilical artery, club foot and ambiguous genitalia. Ambiguous genitalia is an important finding and visualization of normal external genitalia will probably exclude the diagnosis of bladder and cloacal exstrophy. Cloacal exstrophy is commonly associated with chromosomal abnormalities. Associated abnormalities are rare in bladder exstrophy.
The prognosis depends on the presence of associated anomalies. In isolated defects, with aggressive reconstructive surgery, postoperative survival is more than 80%. However, if the diagnosis is made before viability then termination of pregnancy is an option.
| Gastroschisis|| |
Gastroschisis is sporadic anomaly with a birth prevalence of 1 per 4000. This deformation abnormality is probably caused by disruption of the right omphalomesenteric artery and a resultant full-thickness defect in the abdominal wall located just lateral and usually to the right of an intact umbilical cord. As a result, evisceration of small bowel and, on occasion, even large bowel occurs into the amniotic space . Prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound is based on the demonstration of the normally situated umbilical cord insertion and the herniated free-floating loops of intestine without any membranous covering or a sac [Figure - 13] a,b,c. Since these free-floating bowel loops lie uncovered in the amniotic fluid, they may become thick, edematous and matted and appear as an echogenic cauliflower-shaped mass protruding through the fetal abdomen  [Figure - 13]a,b,c or an echogenic mass with ragged edge. In addition to bowel, occasionally, herniation of liver, pancreas, stomach, spleen, bladder, uterus, ovaries, and Fallopian tube More Detailss may also occur. The anomaly can be diagnosed as early as 12 weeks of gestation ,[64 ] but there is a sparsity of reports on first-trimester diagnosis. Gastroschisis is usually an isolated anomaly but sometimes it may be associated with congenital heart abnormalities , ectopia cordis , neural tube  and diaphragmatic defects . Karyotype abnormalities are exceedingly rare . However, some familial cases have been reported . An autosomal recessive model of inheritance was found to be the most parsimonious explanation for the families of infants with isolated omphalocele and gastroschisis .
Affected patients have malrotated bowel. Vascular compromise may occur from a volvulus. Serial ultrasound follow-up is important because later in pregnancy bowel obstruction, peritonitis, bowel perforation, and fetal growth restriction may occur . A bowel diameter greater than 17 mm represents significant bowel dilation due to obstruction [Figure - 13]b. Bowel diameter more than 11 mm is usually associated with a greater number of postnatal bowel complications. Sonographic findings of bowel abnormalities are associated with difficult abdominal wall repair and increased incidence of complications. However, sonographic evaluation of bowel dilation for the purpose of preventing bowel injury by early delivery is not generally helpful . Overall prognosis is usually favorable. Postoperative survival is about 95% and is largely the result of lack of other severe anomalies associated with this defect . However, the postoperative hospital stay is often lengthy and complications related to the gastrointestinal tract are very common . Mortality is usually the consequence of short gut syndrome.
Differential diagnosis includes physiologic bowel herniation, omphalocele especially with ruptured sac, umbilical hernia, amniotic band syndrome, bladder and cloacal exstrophy, body stalk anomaly, cavernous hemangioma, pentalogy of Cantrell, blood clots due to placental abruption [Figure - 10] a,b, and sometimes acardiac monster [Figure - 11]a.
| Body stalk anomaly|| |
Body stalk anomaly is a sporadic, lethal abnormality, found in about 1 per 10,000 pregnancies. The pathogenesis is uncertain but possible causes include abnormal folding of the trilaminal embryo during the first 4 weeks of development, early amnion rupture with amniotic band syndrome, and early generalized compromise of embryonic blood flow. The ultrasonographic features are, a major abdominal wall defect, severe kyphoscoliosis, a short or absent or rudimentary umbilical cord, and limb abnormalities. Absence of the umbilicus and umbilical cord causes adherence of the placenta to the herniated viscera such as liver and intestines rendering the fetus immobile , [Figure - 14]a,b,c. The typical features of body stalk anomaly can be detected by ultrasound by the end of the first trimester. The anomaly is usually associated with abnormal nuchal thickness measurements. Sometimes, in the first trimester, it is possible to demonstrate the upper part of the fetal body in the amniotic cavity and the lower part in the celomic cavity. The finding suggests the early amnion rupture before obliteration of the celomic cavity is a possible cause of the syndrome . The anomaly is usually not associated with karyotypic abnormalities . Smrcek JM et al reported a case in which mosaic trisomy 2 was found .
| Prune- belly syndrome|| |
This syndrome, also called triad syndrome or Eagle-Barrett syndrome More Details, occurs in approximately 1 in 40,000 births; 95% of affected individuals are male. Its etiology and pathogenesis is uncertain and may result from primary obstructive urinary anomalies or defective mesodermal development. It is characterized by a triad of distinctive features including deficient abdominal muscles, undescended testes, and urinary tract abnormalities probably due to severe urethral obstruction in fetal life . Urinary tract abnormalities include massive dilatation of the ureters and upper tracts and a very large bladder. Anterior and posterior urethra may be dilated, resulting in megalourethra. The kidneys usually show various degrees of dysplasia. In females, anomalies of the urethra, uterus, and vagina are usually present. The diagnosis should be suspected in fetuses with very large abdominal masses. These masses are most typically a result of bladder obstructions due urethral valves [Figure - 15]a or urethral agenesis [Figure - 15]b, but other large abdominal masses such as ovarian cyst, hydrometrocolpos, massively enlarged kidneys [Figure - 15]c, and bowel (especially due to Hirschsprung's disease) can also be the cause. The syndrome may be associated with cardiovascular malformation , gastrointestinal anomalies , musculoskeletal defects including limb abnormalities  and scoliosis. Differential diagnosis includes megacystis megaureter, urethral obstruction, primary vesicourethral reflux , neurogenic bladder, and megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome.
Termination of pregnancy can be offered before viability. The prognosis depends on the degree of renal function compromise. Early urinary obstruction leads to renal failure, pulmonary hypoplasia and death in neonatal period.
| References|| |
|1.||Axt R, Quijano F, Boos R et al . Omphalocele and gastroschisis: Prenatal diagnosis and peripartal management. A case analysis of the years 1989-1997 at the Department of obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Homburg / Saar. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999 Nov, 87(1): 47-54. |
|2.||Boyd PA, Bhattacharjee A, Gould S et al. Outcome of prenatally diagnosed anterior abdominal wall defects. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 May; 78 (3): F 209-13. |
|3.||Weber TR, AU-Fliegner M, Downard CD, Fishman SJ. Curr Opin Pediatr 2002 Aug;14(4):491-7 |
|4.||How HY, Harris BJ, Pietrantoni M, Evans JC, Dutton S, Khoury TA. Is vaginal delivery preferable to elective cesarean delivery with a known ventral wall defect ?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun; 182 (6) : 1527-34. |
|5.||Fogata ML, Collins HB 2nd, Wagner CW, Angtuaco TL. Prenatal diagnosis of complicated abdominal wall defects. Curr Probl Daign Radiol. 1999 Jul-Aug; 28(4): 101-28 |
|6.||Chen CP, Liu FF, Jan SW, Sheu JC et al. Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal aspects of abdominal wall defects. Am J Perinatol 1996 Aug; 13(6): 355-6 |
|7.||Walkiinshaw SA, Renwick M, Hebishch G, Hey EN. How goood is ultrasound in the detection and evaluation of anteriuor abdominal wall defects ?. Br J Radiol. 1992 Apr;65 (772):298-301 |
|8.||Bariisic I, Clementi M, Hausler M, Gjerja R et al. Evaluation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abdominal wall defects by 19 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct ; 18(4): 309-16. |
|9.||Botto LD, Erickson JD, Mulinare J et al. Occurrence of omphalocele in relation to materal multivitamin use: a population based study. Pediatrics. 2002 May; 109(5),904-8. |
|10.||Czeizel AE, Toth M, Rockenbauer M. Population-based care-control study of folic acid supplimentation during pregnancy. Teratology 1996; 53:345-351 [PUBMED] |
|11.||Torfs CP, Lam PK, Schaffer DM et al. Association between mother's nutrient intake and their offspring's risk of gastroschisis. Teratology 1998; 58: 241-50 |
|12.||Hume RF, Gingras JL, Martin LS, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal anomalies associated with in utero cocaine exposure: Further support for cocaine-induced vascular disruption teratogenesis. Fetal Diagn Ther 1994,9:239. |
|13.||Torfs CP, Velie EM, Oechsli FW, et al. A population-based study of gastroschisis: demographic, pregnancy and lifestyle risk factors. Teratology 1994;60:44-53. |
|14.||Van Den Eeden SK, Karagas MR, Daling JR, Vaughan TL. A case-control study of maternal smoking and congenital malformations. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1990; 116:1-6 |
|15.||Lam PK, Torfs CP, Brand RJ. A low pregnancy body mass index is a risk factor for an offspring with gastroschisis. Epidemiology 1999; 10: 717-721. |
|16.||Moore LL, Singer MR, Bradlee ML et al. A prospective study of the risk of congenital defects associated with maternal obesity and diabetes mellitus. Epidemiology 2000; 11:689-694 |
|17.||Vriheld M, Dolk H, Stone D, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in risk of congenital anomaly. Arch Dis Child 2000; 82:349-52 |
|18.||Snijders RJM, Sebire NJ, Souka A, Santiago C, Nicolaides KH. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abdominal wall defects: a retrospective analysis of 44 cases. Prenat Diagn 1996; 16:411-17. |
|19.||Stoll C, alembik Y, Dott B, Roth MP. Risk factors in congenital abdominal wall defects (omphalocele and gastroschisi): a study in a series of 265,858 consecutive births. Ann Genet. 2001 Oct-Dec; 44 (4): 201-8. |
|20.||Kazaura MR, Lie RT, Irgens LM et al. Increased risk of gastroschisis in Norway : an age-period-cohort analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159:358-363. |
|21.||Salihu HM, Boos R, Schmidt W. Omphalocele and gastroschisis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Sep; 22(5): 489-92. |
|22.||Bugge M, Holm NV. Abdominal wall defects in Denmark, 1970-89. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002; 16:73-81. |
|23.||Harrison MR, Golbus MS, Filly RA, Management of the fetus with an abdominal wall defect. In:Orlando FL.ed. The unborn patient. Prenatal diagnosis and treatment. New York: Grune and Stratton. 1984: 217-234 |
|24.||Blazer S, Zimmer EZ, Gover A, Bronshtein M. Fetal omphalocele detected early in pregnancy: associated anomalies and outcomes. Radiology 2004: 232:191-195. |
|25.||Baird P.A. MacDonald EC. An epideomilogic study of congenital malformations of the anterior abdominal wall in more than half a million consecutive live births. Am J Hum Genet 1981;33:470-478. |
|26.||Grosfield JL, Dawes L, Weber TR. Congenital abdominal wall defects; current management and survival. Surg Clin North Am 1981;61:1037-1049. |
|27.||Mayer T, Black R, Matlack ME, Johnson DG. Gastroschisis and omphalocele: an eight year review . Ann Surg 1980; 192:783-787. |
|28.||Mann L, Ferguson-Smith MA, Desai M et al. Prenatal assessment of anterior abdominal wall defects and there prognosis. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4:427-435. |
|29.||Mabogunje OA, Mahour GH. Omphalocele and gastroschisis Trends in survival across two decades. Am J Surg 148: 679- 686. |
|30.||Hauge M, Bugge M, Nielson J. Early prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele constitutes indication for amniocentesis. Lancet 1983;ii:507. |
|31.||Leon G, Chedraui P, San Miguel G. Prenatal diagnosis of Cantrell's pentalogy with conventional and three-dimensional sonography. Journal of maternal-fetal and neonatal medicine Sep;2000(12) 3;209-211. |
|32.||Van Zalen-Spreock RM, van Vugt JMG, van Geijn HP. First-trimester sonography of physiological midgut herniation and early diagnosis of omphalocele. Prenat Diagn. 1997; 17:511-18. |
|33.||Czeizel A. New lethal omphalocele-cleftpalate syndrome ?. Hum. Genet.64;1983: 99. |
|34.||Koontz WL, Shaw LA, Lavery JP. Antenatal sonographic appearance of Beckwith-Widemann syndrome. JCU 1986;14:57-59. |
|35.||Nyberg DA, Fitzsimmons J, Mack LA, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with omphalocele; Significance of omphalocele contents. J Ultrasound Med 1989; 8:299-308. |
|36.||Gilbert WM, Nicolaides KH. Fetal omphalocele: associated malformations and chromosomal defects.Obstet Gynecol 1987:70:633-635. |
|37.||Getachew MM, Goldstein RB, Edge V, Goldberg JD, Filly RA. Correlation between omphalocele contents and karyotypic abnormalities : Sonographic study in 37 cases. AJR 1992 Jan;158 (1):11-6. |
|38.||Salihu HM, Boos R, Schmidt W. Omphalocele and gastroschisis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Sep; 22(5): 489-92 |
|39.||Pryde PG, Greb A, Isada NB et al. Familial omphalocele: consideration in genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet.1992 Nov 15; 44 (5):624-7. |
|40.||Heider AL, Strauss RA, Kuller JA. Omphalocele: Clinical outcomes in cases with normal karyotypes. Am J obstet Gynecol 2004 Jan;190(1):135-41. |
|41.||Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH, KiserT, Hellevik LR. Early development of the hindbrain: a longitudinal ultrasound study from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet gynecol 1995;6:240-9. |
|42.||Timor-Tritsch IE, Warren W, Peisner DB, Pirrone E. First-trimester midgut herniation: a high frequency transvaginal sonographis study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161:831-3. |
|43.||Brown DL, Emerson DS, Shulman LP, Carson SA. Sonographic diagnosis of omphalocele during 10th weeks of gestation. Am J Radiol 1989; 153:825-6. |
|44.||Pagliano M, Mossetti M, Ragno P. Echographic diagnosis of omphalocele in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18:658-60. |
|45.||Spencer R, Robichaux WH, Superneau DW, Lucas VW Jr. Unusual cardiac malformations in conjoined twins: thoracopagus twins with conjoined pentalogy of Cantrell and an omphalopagus twin with atretic ventricles. Pediatr Cardiol 2002 Nov-Dec; 23(6): 631-8 |
|46.||Siles C, Boyd PA, Manning et al. Omphalocele and pericardial effusion : possible sonographic markers for the pentalogy of Cantrell or its variants. Obstet Gynecol 1996 May; 87(5 pt 2): 840-2 |
|47.||Stepan H, Horn LC, Bennek J, Faber R. Congenital hernia of the abdominal wall: a differential diagnosis fetal abdominal wall defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 March; 13 (3): 207-9. |
|48.||Sherer DM, Dar P. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of congenital umbilical hernia and associated patent omphalomesenteric duct. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2001;5191):66-8 |
|49.||Cantrell JR, Haller JA, Ravitch MM. A syndrome of congenital defects involving the abdominal wall, sternum, diaphragm, pericardium, and heart. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1958 107: 778-792. |
|50.||Chen SC, Peng HC, Chen HC, Chi CS. Cantrell's pentalogy: a case report Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1993 Apr; 51 (4):314-7. |
|51.||Bryke CR, Breg WR : Pentalogy of Cantrell. From Buyse M.L., Birth defects encyclopedia. Blackwell scientific publications 1990: 1375-76. |
|52.||Toyama WM. Combined congenital defects of the anterior abdominal wall, sternum, diaphragm, pericardium, and heart: a case report and review of the syndrome. Pediatrics 1972 (50): 778-792. |
|53.||Bittmann S, Ulus H, Springer A. Combined pentalogy of Cantrell with terology of Fallot, gallbladder agenesis, and polysplenia : a case report. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Jan; 39(1):107-9. |
|54.||Pollio F, Sica C, Pacilio N et al. Pentalogy of Cantrell : First trimester prenatal diagnosis and association with multicistic dysplastic kidney. Minerva Ginecol 2003 Aug; 55 (4): 363- 6. |
|55.||Peer D, Moroder W, Delucca A. Prenatal diagnosis of the pentalogy of Cantrell combined with exencephaly and amniotic band syndrome. Ultraschall Med. 1993 Apr; 14 (2): 94-5. |
|56.||Pampaloni A, Noccioli B, Pampaloni F, Vanini V. Ectopia cordis and Cantrell's pentalogy: personal experience and considerations on the surgical treatment. Pediatr Med Chir. 1997 Jan-Feb; 19(1): 59-64. |
|57.||Mirk P, Calisti A, Fileni A. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of bladder exstrophy. J.Ultrasound Med 1993;5:291-293. |
|58.||Kutzner DK, Wilson WG, Hogge WA. OEIS complex (cloacal exstrophy): prenatal diagnosis in the second trimester. Prenat Diagn 1988;8:247-253. |
|59.||Gearhart JP, Ben-Chaim J, Jeffs RD, Sanders RC. Criteria for prenatal diagnosis of classic bladder exstrophy. Obs Gynaecol 1995:85 961-964. |
|60.||Pinette MG, Pan yQ, Pinette SG et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal bladder and cloacal exstrophy by ultrasound. A report of three cases. J Reprod Med. 1996 Feb;41 (2):132-4. |
|61.||Megnin AJ, Balotin RJ, Jelinek JS et al. Cloacal exstrophy: radiologic findings in 13 patients. AJR 1990: 155:1267-72. |
|62.||Martin RW. Screening for fetal abdominal wall defects. Obste Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998 Sep; 25 (3):517-26. |
|63.||Kushnir O, Izqierdo L, Vigil D, Curet LB. Early transvaginal diagnosis of gastroschisis. J Clirn Ultrasound 1990;18:194-7. |
|64.||Guzman ER. Early prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis with transvaginal sonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1253-4. |
|65.||Agarwal R, Goyal S. Ectopia cordis associated with gastroschisis and other structural defects. Ultrasound International 1997;3:37-41 |
|66.||Romero R, Pilu G, Jeanty P et al. The abdominal wall; Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Norwalk. Appleton and Lange. 1988; 209-232. |
|67.||Hershey DW, Haesslein HC, Marr CC, Adkins JC. Familial abdominal wall defects. Am J Med Genet. 1989 Oct;34 (2):174-6. |
|68.||Yang P, Beaty TH, Khoury MJ et al. Genetic-epidemiologic study of omphalocele and gastroschisis : evidence of heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet. 1992 Nov 15;44 (5):668-75. |
|69.||Paidas MJ, Crombleholme TM, Robertson FM . Prenatal diagnosis and management of the fetuses with an abdominal wall defect. Semin Perinatol 1994, 18:196. |
|70.||Alsulyman OM, Monteiro H, Ouzounian JG et al. Clinical significance of prenatal ultrasonographic intestinal dilatation in fetuses with gastroschisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:982. |
|71.||Durfee SM, Downard CD, Benson CB, Wilson JM. Postnatal outcome of fetuses with the prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21:269-274. |
|72.||Lockwood CJ, Scioscia AL, Hobbins JC. Congenital absence of the umbilical cord resulting from maldevelopment of the embryonic body folding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155:1049-1051. |
|73.||Jauniaux E, Vyas S, Finayson C, Moscoso G et al. Early sonographic diagnosis of body stalk anomaly. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10:127-132. |
|74.||George D, Athanasios P, Demetrios P, Aris A. Body stalk anomaly diagnosed in the 2nd trimester. Fetal diagnosis and therapy 2003; 18: 342-344. |
|75.||Braithwaite J, Economides DL. First-trimester diagnosis of Meckel-Gruber syndrome by transabdominal sonography in a low-risk case. Prenet Diagn 1995;15:1168-70. |
|76.||Smrcek JM. Germer U. Krokowski M et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and management of body stalk anomaly: analysis of nine singleton and two multiple pregnancies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology April 2003; vol.21no.4.322-328. |
|77.||Shih WJ, Greenbaum LD, Baro C: In utero sonogram in Prune-belly syndrome. Urology XX: 1982;102-105. |
|78.||Manival JC et al: Prune-belly syndrome: Clinicopathologic study of 29 cases. Pediatr Pathol 1989 (9): 691-711. |
|79.||Greskovich FJ, Nyberg LM: The prune-belly syndrome: a review of its etiology, defects, treatment, and prognosis. J Urol 1988;140:707-712. |
|80.||Pagon RA, Sith DW, Shepard TH. Urethral obstruction malformation complex: a cause of abdominal muscle deficiency and the prune-belly. J Pediatr 1979, 94:900-6 |
S-9, Bhawani Singh Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302005
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4], [Figure - 5], [Figure - 6], [Figure - 7], [Figure - 8], [Figure - 9], [Figure - 10], [Figure - 11], [Figure - 12], [Figure - 13], [Figure - 14], [Figure - 15]
|This article has been cited by|
||When closure fails: What the radiologist needs to know about the embryology, anatomy and prenatal imaging of ventral body wall defects
| ||Ulysses S. Torres,Eduardo Portela-Oliveira,Heron Werner,Fernanda Del Campo Braojos Braga,Pedro Augusto Nascimento Daltro,Antônio Soares Souza |
| ||Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. 2015; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Prognosis of Gastroschisis and Omphalocele
| ||Eunkyoung Jwa,Seong Chul Kim,Dae Yeon Kim,Ji-Hee Hwang,Jung-Man Namgoong,In-Koo Kim |
| ||Journal of the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons. 2014; 20(2): 38 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
| ||A Alam,S Sahu,IK Indrajit,H Sahani,M Bhatia,R Kumar |
| ||Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2011; 67(2): 169 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Gastroschisis with extracorporeal liver and stomach associated with sacrococcygeal teratoma and limb abnormalities : Gastroschisis with sacrococcygeal teratoma
| ||Sharmila P. Bhanu, Devi K. Sankar |
| ||Congenital Anomalies. 2011; 51(3): 156 |
|[VIEW] | [DOI]|
| || |
| ||Learning Imaging. 2011; 5: 219-243 |
||Challenges and outcomes of management of anterior abdominal wall defects in a Nigerian tertiary hospital
| ||Abdur-Rahman, L. and Abdulrasheed, N. and Adeniran, J. |
| ||African Journal of Paediatric Surgery. 2011; 8(2): 159-163 |
| ||Alam, A. and Sahu, S. and Indrajit, I.K. and Sahani, H. and Bhatia, M. and Kumar, R. |
| ||Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2011; 67(2): 169-170 |
||Pentalogy of cantrell: A case report
| ||Roy, H. and Sarkar, A. and Mukherjee, P. and Maitreyee, N. and Mallik, A. and Ray, K. |
| ||Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 2009; 58(2): 179-182 |
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||21972 |
| Printed||218 |
| Emailed||2 |
| PDF Downloaded||1202 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||8 |